What lies behind anti-China rhetoric in Congress?

By John Ross
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China.org.cn, September 27, 2010
Adjust font size:

But there is a more deep seated reason. Sometime this century, the U.S. will drop from being the largest economy in the world to being the third largest – after China and India. The shift is inevitable – dictated by economics and simple arithmetic. China and India both have four times the population of the U.S. When their per capita GDP reaches more than one quarter that of the U.S., their economies will overtake the U.S.

Anyone in the U.S. trying to prevent this is attempting the impossible. To demand the US remains the world's largest economy is to demand the average person in India or China never enjoys even a quarter of average US living standards. It requires no skill to guess the outcome if this proposition were put to the vote in China or India.

For ordinary Americans what matters is their income, not the absolute size of US GDP. In real terms, several countries, for example Norway and Singapore, already have higher per capita GDPs than the U.S. Even on the most optimistic assumptions, China won't catch up with US living standards until the second half of the century and India will get there even later. But when it happens, both China and India will have economies four times the size of the U.S., and the world will look a totally different place. Everyone, incidentally, will be a lot more prosperous than they are today.

Unfortunately, US neo-conservatives think in terms of power politics not living standards. They are determined that the U.S. will continue to have the largest economy in the world, even if this means people in China and India have their living standards restricted. Since people with such primitive political ideas have no policies to speed up US economic growth, they turn instead to thinking about how to slow down China, regardless of the consequences for the living standards of its people.

Given this interpretation, the manoeuvres in Congress make perfect sense. Tariffs against China will not create US jobs but they will do some, although fortunately not serious, damage to China. (Almost 80 percent of China's exports now go to countries other than the U.S.)

When judging policies we need to ask "cui bono" - who benefits? American workers will not benefit from tariffs against China. Neither will the Chinese population. Only US neo-cons, with their vain hopes of preventing India and China overtaking the U.S., stand to gain.

China's leaders have so far responded to the foolish Congressional attacks with wisdom, firmness and restraint. It is in the interest of everyone that they continue to do so.

The people of China and India have exactly the same right to a high standard of living as the American people – no more and no less. Moves in the US Congress are not the first, and regrettably they will not be the last, distasteful attempt to prevent them achieving it. Apply the test of "who benefits" and it becomes clear why arguments that lack all economic logic are being put forward in Congress.

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit: http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/node_7080931.htm

 

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产美女视频免费看网站| 波多野结衣免费一区视频| 在丈夫面前被侵犯中文字幕| 国产大尺度吃奶无遮无挡网 | √最新版天堂资源网在线| 欧美怡红院免费的全部视频| 国产一级毛片视频| 91福利在线视频| 无码国产精品一区二区高潮| 亚洲欧美国产国产综合一区| 色噜噜的亚洲男人的天堂| 国产精品无码无片在线观看| 不卡视频免费在线观看| 欧美乱子伦videos| 国产精品一区二区久久沈樵| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久| 精品人人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产精品久久久久影院嫩草| 两个人看的www免费视频中文| 欧美人与动欧交视频| 午夜大片免费完整在线看| 久久香蕉国产线看精品| 女人扒开腿让男人桶| 久久国产高清字幕中文| 波多野结衣办公室33分钟| 国产va免费精品观看精品| 14又嫩又紧水又多| 宝贝过来趴好张开腿让我看看| 久久综合丝袜长腿丝袜| 波多野结衣大战欧美黑人| 四虎影视永久在线观看| xxxxx亚洲| 天海翼黄色三级| 久久久久噜噜噜亚洲熟女综合| 欧美日韩亚洲电影| 内射白浆一区二区在线观看| 97在线公开视频| 国内精品卡1卡2卡区别| 中文字幕julia中文字幕| 最新版天堂资源官网| 亚洲男人第一av网站|