Rhetoric threatens to outweigh reality at G20 events

By Stanley Crossick
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, July 1, 2010
Adjust font size:

What was decided in Toronto on the "cut or spend" debate? Needless to say, it's a great challenge to get 20 countries to agree on anything. The skillfully drafted official G20 statement enabled all participants to claim that their deficit reduction strategy had won though.

There was a recognition of the wide variations within different countries and that a "one-size-fits-all" policy is unworkable. Most of the countries support immediate deficit-cutting rather than Obama's stimulus policy as the way back to growth. But Brazil warned that steep budget cuts could harm emerging economies. The compromise suggests unity, but it's hard to see what difference it will make.

The meeting urged countries carrying weighty deficits to boost national savings while maintaining open markets and enhancing export competitiveness. Surplus economies, such as China and Germany, are expected to reduce their reliance on external demand and focus more on domestic sources of growth.

There was consensus on the need to reform global financial governance but not on how. The reform agenda rests on four pillars: a strong regulatory framework, effective supervision, resolution and addressing systemic institutions, and transparent international assessment and peer review.

Despite the setting up of anti-corruption frameworks, the G20 powers couldn't agree on the best methods to implement all four of these steps.

China, however, came out of the summit well. Its surprise announcement on June 19, ending the two-year pegging of the yuan to the dollar, took the subject off the table at the summit. Although the obligation was limited, it was generally well received.

The next summit will be held in Seoul in November. It is important to recognize that summits are relatively short, and are public events from which too much should not be expected, as they are part of a much longer process.

However, the structure of the G20, a key global institution, could be improved.

Close global cooperation in economic and financial policies and to prevent protectionism is vital. After all, we are all seeking common solutions to common problems.

The author is a senior fellow of the Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies. forum@globaltimes.com.cn

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 在线视频国产网址你懂的在线视频| 日韩三级中文字幕| 免费观看的a级毛片的网站| 视频在线观看一区| 国产成人无码一区二区在线播放| 2022国产成人精品福利网站| 天堂mv在线看中文字幕| 一级三级黄色片| 无码免费一区二区三区免费播放| 久久精品国产四虎| 欧洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲无限乱码一二三四区| 激情freesexhd糟蹋videos| 免费成人福利视频| 精品免费一区二区三区| 啦啦啦www播放日本观看| 色综久久天天综合绕视看| 国产在线98福利播放视频免费| 人与动人物欧美网站| 国产精品多p对白交换绿帽| 99re热这里只有精品视频| 女人与禽牲交少妇| 一本色道无码道dvd在线观看| 护士人妻hd中文字幕| 久久久久亚洲av无码尤物| 日本高清护士xxxxx| 久久香蕉国产线| 果冻传媒麻豆电影| 亚洲三级黄色片| 欧美亚洲精品suv| 亚洲乱码无限2021芒果| 欧美人七十二式性视频教程一| 亚洲国产精品综合久久网络| 欧美狂摸吃奶呻吟| 亚洲欧美小视频| 欧美精品一区二区精品久久| 亚洲第一综合天堂另类专| 波多野结衣porn| 亚洲精品国产福利在线观看| 波多野结衣新婚被邻居| 亚洲精品国精品久久99热|