Facing facts about the euro experiment

By Joseph E. Stiglitz
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Shanghai Daily, May 7, 2010
Adjust font size:

At the euro's creation, many worried about its long-run viability. When everything went well, these worries were forgotten. But the question of how adjustments would be made if part of the eurozone were hit by a strong adverse shock lingered.

Fixing the exchange rate and delegating monetary policy to the European Central Bank eliminated two primary means by which national governments stimulate their economies to avoid recession.

What could replace them?

The Nobel Laureate Robert Mundell laid out the conditions under which a single currency could work. Europe didn't meet those conditions at the time; it still doesn't. The removal of legal barriers to the movement of workers created a single labor market, but linguistic and cultural differences make American-style labor mobility unachievable.

Moreover, Europe has no way of helping those countries facing severe problems. Consider Spain, which has an unemployment rate of 20 percent. It had a fiscal surplus before the crisis; after the crisis, its deficit increased to more than 11 percent of GDP. But, under European Union rules, Spain must now cut its spending, which will likely exacerbate unemployment.

Some hoped that the Greek tragedy would convince policy makers that the euro cannot succeed without greater cooperation (including fiscal assistance).

But Germany, partly following popular opinion, has opposed giving Greece the help that it needs. To many, both in and outside of Greece, this stance was peculiar: billions had been spent saving big banks, but evidently saving a country of 11 million people was taboo. It was not even clear that the help Greece needed should be labeled a bailout: while the funds given to financial institutions like AIG were unlikely to be recouped, a loan to Greece at a reasonable interest rate would likely be repaid.

A series of half-offers and vague promises, intended to calm the market, failed. Just as the United States had cobbled together assistance for Mexico 15 years ago by combining help from the International Monetary Fund and the G7, so, too, the EU put together an assistance program with the IMF.

The question was, what conditions would be imposed on Greece? How big would be the adverse impact?

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品人妻无码专区中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久一区二区三区| 免费鲁丝片一级在线观看| 8x成年视频在线观看| 欧美最猛性xxxxx免费| 国产丰满麻豆videossexhd| 99久久99这里只有免费费精品| 日本高清免费看| 亚洲精品自产拍在线观看| 蜜桃麻豆www久久国产精品| 国产黄大片在线视频| 中日韩精品视频在线观看| 欧美日韩一级二级三级| 啊灬啊灬别停啊灬用力啊免费 | 日韩高清伦理片中字在线观看| 免费a级毛片在线播放| 黑色丝袜小舞被躁翻了3d| 天堂资源最新版在线官网| 久久久精品波多野结衣AV| 欧美日韩一区二区在线视频| 人妻少妇无码精品视频区| 色婷婷在线视频| 国产精品99久久久久久人| freehd182d动漫| 无需付费看视频网站入口| 亚洲午夜爱爱香蕉片| 精品一区二区三区四区| 国产剧果冻传媒星空在线播放| 91精品国产综合久久青草| 性欧美16sex性高清播放| 九九精品视频在线播放8| 波多野结衣教师诱惑| 啊好深好硬快点用力别停免费视频 | 日韩欧美在线播放视频| 亚洲熟妇色自偷自拍另类| 精品无码国产自产在线观看水浒传| 国产日韩欧美亚欧在线| 97色精品视频在线观看| 性欧美大战久久久久久久| 中文字幕天天躁日日躁狠狠躁免费 | 欧美夫妇交换完整版随便看|