Home / International / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
AU Makes Compromise on Darfur Mission
Adjust font size:

A conciliatory decision was taken by the African Union (AU) on Friday on the fate of its peacekeeping mission in Sudan's western region of Darfur.

The Sudanese government immediately welcomed the decision adopted by the AU Peace and Security Council (AU-PSC) in a meeting in Addis Ababa to extend its peacekeeping mission in Darfur until Sept. 30 this year and to support in principle a UN takeover of the peacekeeping mission.

Abu Zaid al-Hassan, Sudan's Ambassador to Ethiopia and Permanent Representative in the AU, described the decision as " balanced", adding that "it met most demands of Sudan."

He referred to the two main points satisfying the Sudanese side particularly, one of which was the UN would not send any peacekeeping forces to Darfur without an agreement of the Sudanese government, and the other was the AU-PSC agreement of principle to hand over the peacekeeping mission to the UN was not a final decision.

The AU-PSC also called on the international society to exert its influence to push the peace negotiations between the Sudanese government and Darfur rebel movements forward, and urged the parties involved in the conflict to be committed to the 2004 ceasefire accord.

However, by agreeing in principle on the UN takeover of the Darfur mission after six months, the AU-PSC only postponed a final showdown.

In January, the AU said it could not afford a 7,800-strong African force which was deployed in Darfur in 2004, and suggested a UN takeover of the mission.

The United States has been pressing the African Union, and Sudan in particular, to accept the deployment of an international force to contain the worsening security situation in Darfur.

But the Sudanese government dismissed the proposal as an intervention in Sudan's internal affairs.

Rabia Abd al-Ati, adviser of the Sudanese Ministry of Information and Communications and former Director General of the Sudanese News Agency, said the AU-PSC decision was "expected and unsurprising", which gave the parties an opportunity to review their positions.

"The decision indicates the seriousness of Sudan's opposition to the existence of foreign troops on its territories," the famous political analyst told Xinhua.

Tens of thousands of Sudanese marched through Khartoum on Wednesday, protesting the proposed U.N. takeover.

On the eve of the AU-PSC meeting, the Sudanese government stressed that it would accept the deployment of international forces in Darfur only after a peace agreement was signed between the government and the Darfur rebel movements.

Commenting on the AU-PSC decision, Jamal Mohamed Ibrahim, Spokesman of the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, expressed his hope that the peace agreement would be reached before Sept. 30, adding that the decision kept the Darfur file in the AU's hand.

Clashes flared up in Darfur in February 2003 when local farmers took up arms against the Sudanese government, accusing it of neglecting the barren area. Thousands of people have been killed and more than a million displaced in the violence.

(Xinhua News Agency March 13, 2006 )

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- African Leaders Agree on Cease-fire Measures on Darfur Crisis
- AU Agrees Double Peacekeepers in Darfur
- AU Resumes Troops Deployment in Darfur
- AU Condemns Attack on Peacekeepers in Darfur
- Darfur Rebels Free 36 from African Union
- Darfur Peace Talks End with Modest Progress Made
- AU Proposes Enhanced Humanitarian Ceasefire Agreement for Darfur
Most Viewed >>
> Korean Nuclear Talks
> Reconstruction of Iraq
> Middle East Peace Process
> Iran Nuclear Issue
> 6th SCO Summit Meeting
Links
- China Development Gateway
- Foreign Ministry
- Network of East Asian Think-Tanks
- China-EU Association
- China-Africa Business Council
- China Foreign Affairs University
- University of International Relations
- Institute of World Economics & Politics
- Institute of Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies
- Institute of West Asian & African Studies
- Institute of Latin American Studies
- Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies
- Institute of Japanese Studies
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲视频在线观看免费| 天天做天天爱天天爽综合网| 亚洲美女精品视频| 韩国黄色片在线观看| 天天干天天干天天天天天天爽| 久久成人无码国产免费播放| 特级毛片a级毛片免费播放| 国产免费观看网站| 97久久精品无码一区二区天美| 日本久久中文字幕| 亚洲成av人影片在线观看| 羞羞视频免费网站入口| 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区久久| 一级欧美一级日韩片| 日韩精品无码一本二本三本色 | 高清影院在线欧美人色| 在线观看日韩一区| 中日欧洲精品视频在线| 欧美又粗又长又爽做受| 免费看美女隐私全部| 高清不卡毛片免费观看| 在线播放国产一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码精品三级在线电影| 欧美亚洲国产成人综合在线| 免费国产高清视频| 超清av在线播放不卡无码| 国产精品无码久久av不卡| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合麻豆| 最新69国产成人精品视频69| 亚洲精品午夜国产va久久成人| 联谊对象是肉食系警官第6话| 国产欧美精品一区二区色综合| v电影v亚洲v欧美v国产| 日本三级在线观看免费| 亚洲人成网亚洲欧洲无码| 特级做a爰片毛片免费看无码| 国产99视频精品免费视频7| 性欧美videos高清喷水| 大狠狠大臿蕉香蕉大视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品| 日韩伦人妻无码|