Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
How much is too much?
Adjust font size:

It's high time we prevented government officials from using public funds to travel overseas for leisure in the garb of business trips, says an article in Yangtze Evening Post. Excerpt:

The Guangzhou marine affairs court recently rejected accusations that six of its officials went on a sightseeing tour overseas, wasting a lot of public money.

According to their statement, the six court officials paid a 12-day visit to three foreign countries for "exchanging ideas and inspection". They said the court approved the visit, and the expenditure "did not exceed the budget".

The public was caught by surprise as the court came out with the statement defending its integrity.

People thought the court might be afraid of touching upon the core facts of the visit, such as expenditures and legitimacy. But the court laid out "the facts" before the media, refuting all allegations. But, is the court really innocent?

First, the statement is based on the investigation of the discipline department of the court and, obviously a subordinate department doesn't have the real power to monitor its leaders. Hence its findings are not convincing at all.

Second, although the court said that the visit was approved and legitimate, it didn't explain why they spent more time at tourist sports than at meetings. For example, during the 12-day trip, the officials dropped by only three courts and met one association of lawyers, which took them just about two full days. How did they spend the remaining 10 days?

The court said that each of the officials spent 80,000 yuan during the trip, adding that the expenditure didn't exceed the budget. But as far as we know, the market price for the same tour is around 20,000 yuan per person. If four times of the market price still doesn't exceed the budget, the court is really rich.

If the Guangzhou marine affair court can get away with no punishment for this overseas visit, it would set a bad example for other government departments.

The superior government department should intervene to debunk the court's statement.

(China Daily June 15, 2009)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Senior police official removed for serious discipline violation
- Guangdong official investigated over serious discipline violation
- China's anti-graft chief to visit four nations
- Crackdown on graft gets tough

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产三级在线观看免费| 波多野结衣与上司出差| 国产第一页在线观看| AAA日本高清在线播放免费观看| 收集最新中文国产中文字幕| 久草资源在线观看| 欧美疯狂性受xxxxx喷水| 免费精品久久天干天干| 色94色欧美sute亚洲线| 国产成人19禁在线观看| ass亚洲**毛茸茸pics| 夜夜精品无码一区二区三区 | 美女免费网站xx美女女女女女女bbbbbb毛片 | 成人a免费α片在线视频网站| 久久久久性色AV毛片特级| 最新中文字幕在线| 亚洲中文精品久久久久久不卡| 毛片网站是多少| 免费一级欧美在线观看视频片| 精品视频一区二区三区在线观看 | 91麻豆久久久| 女人与公狗交酡过程高清视频| 中文字幕一二三四区2021| 日本精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲AV日韩精品久久久久久| 欧美又粗又长又爽做受| 亚洲日本va中文字幕久久| 永久在线观看www免费视频| 人人爽人人爽人人片av| 福利视频导航网| 免费观看性生活大片| 精品综合久久久久久888蜜芽| 国产aⅴ激情无码久久久无码| 蜜桃麻豆www久久国产精品| 国产人妖ts视频在线观看| 高清欧美性暴力猛交| 国产强被迫伦姧在线观看无码| 国产成人精品怡红院| 国产欧美成人免费观看| 五月婷婷在线视频| 国产破处在线视频|