Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
How much is too much?
Adjust font size:

It's high time we prevented government officials from using public funds to travel overseas for leisure in the garb of business trips, says an article in Yangtze Evening Post. Excerpt:

The Guangzhou marine affairs court recently rejected accusations that six of its officials went on a sightseeing tour overseas, wasting a lot of public money.

According to their statement, the six court officials paid a 12-day visit to three foreign countries for "exchanging ideas and inspection". They said the court approved the visit, and the expenditure "did not exceed the budget".

The public was caught by surprise as the court came out with the statement defending its integrity.

People thought the court might be afraid of touching upon the core facts of the visit, such as expenditures and legitimacy. But the court laid out "the facts" before the media, refuting all allegations. But, is the court really innocent?

First, the statement is based on the investigation of the discipline department of the court and, obviously a subordinate department doesn't have the real power to monitor its leaders. Hence its findings are not convincing at all.

Second, although the court said that the visit was approved and legitimate, it didn't explain why they spent more time at tourist sports than at meetings. For example, during the 12-day trip, the officials dropped by only three courts and met one association of lawyers, which took them just about two full days. How did they spend the remaining 10 days?

The court said that each of the officials spent 80,000 yuan during the trip, adding that the expenditure didn't exceed the budget. But as far as we know, the market price for the same tour is around 20,000 yuan per person. If four times of the market price still doesn't exceed the budget, the court is really rich.

If the Guangzhou marine affair court can get away with no punishment for this overseas visit, it would set a bad example for other government departments.

The superior government department should intervene to debunk the court's statement.

(China Daily June 15, 2009)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Senior police official removed for serious discipline violation
- Guangdong official investigated over serious discipline violation
- China's anti-graft chief to visit four nations
- Crackdown on graft gets tough

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 桃花影院www视频播放| 精品免费国产一区二区三区| 国产精品美女视频| www.日本在线视频| 无码一区二区三区免费| 九九免费精品视频在这里| 欧美日本一道高清免费3区| 人妻av综合天堂一区| 精品国产乱码一区二区三区 | 边摸边脱吃奶边高潮视频免费| 国产男人的天堂| 18国产精品白浆在线观看免费| 在线播放国产视频| a级成人免费毛片完整版| 强行扒开双腿猛烈进入| 中文字幕在线免费看| 日本乱偷互换人妻中文字幕| 久别的草原电视剧免费观看| 欧美另类精品xxxx人妖换性| 亚洲成在人线在线播放无码| 波多野结衣一二三区| 人妻精品久久久久中文字幕69| 精品国产污污免费网站入口| 噜噜噜在线观看播放视频| 草草影院ccyy国产日本欧美| 国产妇乱子伦视频免费| 免费看黄色网页| 国产精品jizz在线观看直播| 最新黄色免费网站| 国产精品对白刺激久久久| 2021国产麻豆剧果冻传媒影视| 国内精品免费麻豆网站91麻豆| Av鲁丝一区鲁丝二区鲁丝三区| 女人18毛片a级毛片一区二区| √天堂资源地址在线官网| 山村乱肉系列h| 一区二区三区四区欧美| 小仙女坐在胯下受辱h| 一本高清在线视频| 小次郎收藏最新地址| 一男一女的一级毛片|