Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
How much is too much?
Adjust font size:

It's high time we prevented government officials from using public funds to travel overseas for leisure in the garb of business trips, says an article in Yangtze Evening Post. Excerpt:

The Guangzhou marine affairs court recently rejected accusations that six of its officials went on a sightseeing tour overseas, wasting a lot of public money.

According to their statement, the six court officials paid a 12-day visit to three foreign countries for "exchanging ideas and inspection". They said the court approved the visit, and the expenditure "did not exceed the budget".

The public was caught by surprise as the court came out with the statement defending its integrity.

People thought the court might be afraid of touching upon the core facts of the visit, such as expenditures and legitimacy. But the court laid out "the facts" before the media, refuting all allegations. But, is the court really innocent?

First, the statement is based on the investigation of the discipline department of the court and, obviously a subordinate department doesn't have the real power to monitor its leaders. Hence its findings are not convincing at all.

Second, although the court said that the visit was approved and legitimate, it didn't explain why they spent more time at tourist sports than at meetings. For example, during the 12-day trip, the officials dropped by only three courts and met one association of lawyers, which took them just about two full days. How did they spend the remaining 10 days?

The court said that each of the officials spent 80,000 yuan during the trip, adding that the expenditure didn't exceed the budget. But as far as we know, the market price for the same tour is around 20,000 yuan per person. If four times of the market price still doesn't exceed the budget, the court is really rich.

If the Guangzhou marine affair court can get away with no punishment for this overseas visit, it would set a bad example for other government departments.

The superior government department should intervene to debunk the court's statement.

(China Daily June 15, 2009)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Senior police official removed for serious discipline violation
- Guangdong official investigated over serious discipline violation
- China's anti-graft chief to visit four nations
- Crackdown on graft gets tough

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 2021国内精品久久久久影院| 又大又紧又硬又湿a视频| 99久久精品免费观看国产| 成人性一级视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久亚洲区色播| 精品无码人妻夜人多侵犯18| 国产精品无码素人福利不卡| re99热久久这里只有精品| 我要看18毛片| 久久国产成人精品国产成人亚洲 | 啊灬老师灬老师灬别停灬用力| 97成人碰碰久久人人超级碰OO | 主人啊灬啊别停灬用力啊视频| 正在播放黑人巨大视频| 国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 欧美成人三级一区二区在线观看| 国产精品看高国产精品不卡| 99热国产精品| 日本免费一区二区三区最新| 亚洲av高清一区二区三区| 欧美性色黄大片www喷水| 亚洲欧美激情小说另类| 老熟妇高潮一区二区三区| 国产午夜亚洲精品不卡免下载| 欧美丰满白嫩bbwbbw| 国产第一区二区三区在线观看| 18精品久久久无码午夜福利| 国产美女精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕一区二区在线播放| 欧洲最强rapper网站在线看| 亚洲成年人电影在线观看| 欧美综合区自拍亚洲综合绿色| 亚洲美女免费视频| 特一级黄色毛片| 人人影院免费大片| 男人j放进女人p全黄| 免费a级黄色片| 裙子底下真空h揉搓小雪| 国产午夜a理论毛片在线影院| 骚视频在线观看| 国产精品永久免费视频|