Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
People need to accept life without plastic bags
Adjust font size:  ZoomIn ZoomOut

Compared with plastic, bags of other materials, including those made of paper and cloth, do not have the same advantages. And they could also cause environmental problems. Paper is made from trees; papermaking and textile are both industries producing huge amounts of sewage, which might pollute rivers and seas.

Moreover, paper and cloth bags are not easy to carry around. Convenience is an important element to change consumers' preference, which is why supermarkets have largely replaced the traditional retail outlets.

It is hard to imagine customers walking out of supermarkets or small shops with hands full of grocery items. Nor is it realistic to expect people take cloth or paper bags every time they go shopping. Moreover, the cloth bags need to be washed now and then, while the paper bags cannot be used to carry heavy things.

There is a view that the State ban against plastic bags goes beyond reducing the number of plastic bags, and actually advocates conservation of resources, natural lifestyle and environmental protection.

It is true that everyone wishes to live in a good environment. However, it is also necessary to stress that economic development, public welfare and environmental protection have a complex relationship among themselves.

Most of our manufacturing and consumption, such as papermaking and automobiles, have environmental influences.

Most people condemn pollutant producers in ethical terms. But the polluters did not produce just to destroy the environment, but to satisfy the demand of consumers. In a sense, the environment is an indispensable input for economic development.

The consumers should also realize that pollution is inevitable, though the degree differs, when they require the industries to produce certain commodities they need.

A renowned economist said that tolerance to dirtiness is a precondition for getting rich. It is true. When the economy develops to a relatively high level, people become less tolerant to environment problems and are more ready to pay the costs of protecting environment.

This process is what we call "pollute first and treat later". Definitely, it is not economical, but the experiences from economic development across the world prove it is hard, or even impossible, to avoid.

The environment protection has a close relationship with economic development and it could not go beyond the latter.

By now, several developed countries have restrictions about production and distribution of plastic bags, but few have the same harsh stipulations as that in China. Do they not worry about the environment risk of plastic bags? They did not ban the bags as we did for they found their alternatives might be even more costly.

It is reported that the Chinese consumers use 3 billion plastic bags every year, which need 13,000 tons of crude oil to produce. If this oil was saved from producing plastic bags, how could they be used? As fuel for automobiles? Is this change less threatening to the environment or is it more decent in ethical terms? As long as it is spent to boost consumer interests or public welfare, the oil has not been wasted.

As a national law, the plastic bag ban should be abided by in metropolises as well as in small towns. But the supervision over its full implementation might be difficult. If those violating the rule in cities are punished while those in remote areas are not, it would obviously harm the authority of the law.

Reducing the use of plastic bags is, of course, an environment-friendly move, but it should be carried out with proper arrangements. It would have been more convenient to consumers if the ban had been issued after practical alternatives to plastic bags were made easy to get and substantial improvement was made in recycling plastic bags.

About two decades ago, it was proposed that disposable chopsticks should not be used in order to protect the forests. And several rules and regulations were issued to support it. However, disposable chopsticks are everywhere to be seen even now. Let us wait and see whether the plastic bag ban would be better observed.

The author is deputy director of the Center for Financial Research, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

(China Daily June 18, 2008)

     1   2  


Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Bye to plastic bag full of trouble
Most Viewed >>
- Floods take a toll on life, kill 169 in south China
- Gang smashes up hotel in Shanghai
- The Yellow Mountains (Huangshan) in Anhui
- US, China sign 71 contracts worth US$13.6 bln
- 3 dead as small plane crashes in Inner Mongolia

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 91香蕉短视频| 久久久久久久久蜜桃| 激情成人综合网| 后入内射欧美99二区视频| 香蕉久久精品国产| 国产福利高颜值在线观看| 91香蕉短视频| 夜夜揉揉日日人人| 用舌头去添高潮无码视频| 国产私拍福利精品视频网站| 国产三级久久久精品麻豆三级| 88国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 天天操天天爱天天干| 一级毛片免费视频网站| 污污视频在线观看黄| 免费成人激情视频| 精品精品国产高清a毛片| 国产一区二区三区亚洲综合| 韩国理论片久久电影网| 国产成人久久精品二区三区 | 欧美视频自拍偷拍| 人人澡人人澡人人看添欧美| 精品一区二区三区四区五区六区| 卡一卡二卡三精品| 美女扒开大腿让我爽| 国产精品久久久久久影视| 三浦惠理子在线播放| 无码h黄肉3d动漫在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美国产第一区二区三区| 永久看一二三四线| 亚洲综合视频在线观看| 狂野小农民在线播放观看| 免费v片在线观看品善网| 精品一区二区三区免费毛片爱| 动漫美女羞羞网站| 精品四虎免费观看国产高清午夜| 啪啪免费小视频| 美女毛片在线观看| 卡一卡二卡三精品| 精品国产91久久久久久久a| 午夜亚洲av永久无码精品|