It is unfair that some migrant workers' wage level cannot even
compete with the urban minimum living subsidy standard, says a
signed article in Guangzhou Daily. An excerpt follows:
To provide the minimum living subsidy to poor people is an issue
that not only concerns fairness but also a measure of what kind of
society we are. But now it has emerged that fraudulent applications
and claims are being made while some sit idle on unearned
subsidies. These are problems plaguing the minimum living subsidy
system. When the financial support is limited, such behavior
directly affects the rights of other honest citizens who are in
real need of such subsidy.
This plundering needs to stop.
There are possibly two reasons for the irregularities in the
system. One is the government cannot get to the bottom of the real
financial situation of the false applicants. The other is that some
officials and applicants collude in fraud.
What is urgently needed is an enhanced unified electronic
information system in the country. Once this is implemented, the
amount of cheating, stealing and fraudulent behavior will be
significantly reduced.
Corrupt officials need to be brought into line, by improving the
institutional systems.
Of course there is a long way to go to perfect the minimum
living subsidy system. For example the living subsidy standard
should be gradually improved to cope with price rises. Except for
those who cannot physically work, other people should earn their
living by getting a new job instead of sitting idle.
But sadly, the wage level of many farmer-turned migrant worker
cannot even compete with the minimum living subsidy standard. This
is most unfair part of this system.
A harmonious society should break institutional barriers and
provide fair treatment to all.
(China Daily June 29, 2007)