Home Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Work reports on justice, prosecution
Adjust font size:

Chinese top judge Xiao Yang said since the Supreme Court took back the power of reviewing death sentences from provincial courts since Jan. 1 last year, the capital punishment has been "strictly, cautiously, and fairly" meted out to the tiny number of serious criminal offenders in China.

"The transition work has been smooth, orderly and trials of death sentence cases normal," Xiao, president of the Supreme People's Court and chief justice, said in his work report to the ongoing session of the Parliament, without elaboration.

Xiao said the SPC has in the past year improved the procedure for second instance trials of death sentence cases and the procedure for the final review of death penalty with unified criteria applied.

"The SPC has been working to ensure that the capital punishment only applies to the very few number of felons who committed extremely serious, atrocious crimes that lead to grave social consequences," Xiao told the lawmakers.

Xiao did not give the figure on how many people were executed last year. However, presiding judge of the SPC's First Criminal Law Court Huang Ermei said in a recent media interview that the supreme court rejected 15 percent of death sentences for reasons including facts to be clarified, lack of evidences and procedure faults since the beginning of last year.

Rozi Ismail, president of the higher people's court of the northwestern Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, told Xinhua that immediate executions after sentences in the region were reduced by half last year compared with 2006.

The SPC taking back the power of reviewing death sentences is a major reform in China's criminal justice system, which provides procedural guarantees for preventing misjudged cases and safeguarding offenders' legal rights, said the Xinjiang judge.

Legal professionals have observed that with the resumption of SPC death sentence reviewing right, local courts have already become more cautious in issuing death orders.

Chinese justice community agrees that death sentence is necessary for the country at the present stage to serve as a powerful deterrent against crimes for the maintaining of social stability and national security, and in the meantime China should reduce the number of capital punishments till this penalty is finally abolished when conditions are ripe.

     1   2   3   4    


Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
- Female members of NPC & CPPCC
- White paper published on China's rule of law
- Xinjiang Party chief on top of terrorists' wanted list
- Female working staff at NPC & CPPCC
- Key energy reserve blueprint on anvil
Questions and Answers More
Q: What kind of law is there in place to protect pandas?
A: In order to put the protection of giant pandas and other wildlife under the law, the Chinese government put the protection of rare animals and plants into the Constitution.
Useful Info
- Who's Who in China's Leadership
- State Structure
- China's Political System
- China's Legislative System
- China's Judicial System
- Mapping out 11th Five-Year Guidelines
Links
- Chinese Embassies
- International Department, Central Committee of CPC
- State Organs Work Committee of CPC
- United Front Work Department, Central Committee of CPC
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲第一页在线| 国产69久久精品成人看| 亚洲性猛交xx乱| 真正国产乱子伦高清对白| 国产一区二区三区久久精品| 97午夜伦伦电影理论片| 小镇姑娘hd电影在线观看| 久久91这里精品国产2020| 日韩毛片免费看| 亚洲香蕉免费有线视频| 美女下面直流白浆视频| 国产三级精品三级| 黄瓜视频入口在线播放| 国产激情一区二区三区| 18禁无遮挡羞羞污污污污免费| 成人免费观看网欧美片| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区体验| 日韩人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲一区二区三区免费在线观看| 欧美极品少妇×XXXBBB| 口国产成人高清在线播放| 超碰色偷偷男人的天堂| 国产成人无码免费视频97| 日本三级香港三级人妇99视| 女性高爱潮真实有声视频| 中文字幕免费在线播放| 日本伦理电影网伦理在线电影| 亚洲熟女综合一区二区三区| 美女毛片一区二区三区四区| 国产精品入口麻豆免费| 99久久婷婷国产综合精品| 手机在线看片不卡中文字幕| 久久国产乱子伦免费精品| 日韩福利电影网| 亚洲AV永久无码天堂网| 欧日韩在线不卡视频| 人与禽交另类网站视频| 精品一二三区久久AAA片| 午夜人屠h精品全集| 高清videosgratis欧洲69| 国产精品男男视频一区二区三区 |