Home Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Work reports on justice, prosecution
Adjust font size:

Chinese top judge Xiao Yang said since the Supreme Court took back the power of reviewing death sentences from provincial courts since Jan. 1 last year, the capital punishment has been "strictly, cautiously, and fairly" meted out to the tiny number of serious criminal offenders in China.

"The transition work has been smooth, orderly and trials of death sentence cases normal," Xiao, president of the Supreme People's Court and chief justice, said in his work report to the ongoing session of the Parliament, without elaboration.

Xiao said the SPC has in the past year improved the procedure for second instance trials of death sentence cases and the procedure for the final review of death penalty with unified criteria applied.

"The SPC has been working to ensure that the capital punishment only applies to the very few number of felons who committed extremely serious, atrocious crimes that lead to grave social consequences," Xiao told the lawmakers.

Xiao did not give the figure on how many people were executed last year. However, presiding judge of the SPC's First Criminal Law Court Huang Ermei said in a recent media interview that the supreme court rejected 15 percent of death sentences for reasons including facts to be clarified, lack of evidences and procedure faults since the beginning of last year.

Rozi Ismail, president of the higher people's court of the northwestern Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, told Xinhua that immediate executions after sentences in the region were reduced by half last year compared with 2006.

The SPC taking back the power of reviewing death sentences is a major reform in China's criminal justice system, which provides procedural guarantees for preventing misjudged cases and safeguarding offenders' legal rights, said the Xinjiang judge.

Legal professionals have observed that with the resumption of SPC death sentence reviewing right, local courts have already become more cautious in issuing death orders.

Chinese justice community agrees that death sentence is necessary for the country at the present stage to serve as a powerful deterrent against crimes for the maintaining of social stability and national security, and in the meantime China should reduce the number of capital punishments till this penalty is finally abolished when conditions are ripe.

     1   2   3   4    


Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
- Female members of NPC & CPPCC
- White paper published on China's rule of law
- Xinjiang Party chief on top of terrorists' wanted list
- Female working staff at NPC & CPPCC
- Key energy reserve blueprint on anvil
Questions and Answers More
Q: What kind of law is there in place to protect pandas?
A: In order to put the protection of giant pandas and other wildlife under the law, the Chinese government put the protection of rare animals and plants into the Constitution.
Useful Info
- Who's Who in China's Leadership
- State Structure
- China's Political System
- China's Legislative System
- China's Judicial System
- Mapping out 11th Five-Year Guidelines
Links
- Chinese Embassies
- International Department, Central Committee of CPC
- State Organs Work Committee of CPC
- United Front Work Department, Central Committee of CPC
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人免费高清激情视频| 大香伊人久久精品一区二区| 九色综合狠狠综合久久| 欧美黑人又粗又大久久久| 午夜a一级毛片一.成| 蜜桃av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产成人精品电影| xxxxx免费视频| 欧美亚洲国产激情一区二区| 免费乱码中文字幕网站| 美女教师一级毛片| 国产人碰人摸人爱视频| 狠狠色欧美亚洲综合色黑a| 国产精品毛片大码女人| 久久国产精品久久| 欧美αv日韩αv另类综合| 亚洲欧美在线看| 热RE99久久6国产精品免费| 免费观看午夜在线欧差毛片 | 欧美一级特黄aa大片在线观看免费 | 很黄很色的女同性互慰小说| 亚洲av综合色区无码一区爱av | 亚洲色婷婷六月亚洲婷婷6月| 站在镜子前看我怎么c你| 午夜视频在线免费| 美女视频黄.免费网址| 国产精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 97国产免费全部免费观看| 夜夜高潮夜夜爽夜夜爱爱| www.波多野| 日本牲交大片无遮挡| 久久精品国产四虎| 欧美系列第一页| 亚洲精品亚洲人成在线| 波多野结衣电影一区二区| 嗯灬啊灬老师别揉我奶了啊灬嗯| 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区在线观看| 国产精品无码翘臀在线观看| 69av免费视频| 国产综合视频在线观看一区| 91精品国产乱码久久久久久|