Home / Spotlight on The Death Penalty Review / News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Ex-drug Chief's Execution Justified
Adjust font size:

China's legal experts and the public consider the execution of former drug chief Zheng Xiaoyu to be fully deserved given his shocking dereliction of duty, but many are also warning that China needs to be cautious in handing out death penalties.

Cui Min, a professor at the Chinese People's University of Public Security, said the consequences of Zheng's dereliction of duty were extremely serious, and the court's ruling had sound legal justification.

Zheng, 63, former director of China's State Food and Drug Administration, was executed on Tuesday morning for taking 6.49 million yuan (US$850,000) in bribes and dereliction of duty.

Whether Zheng's death sentence was too harsh is being heatedly debated.

"Given that bribery alone is punishable by death under Chinese law, Zheng deserved the death sentence," said Cui.

Moreover, Zheng's actions put health and life in danger, and shook trust in the government's competence.

Six types of medicine approved by the administration during his tenure were fake, one of which -- an antibiotic injection -- caused the deaths of at least six people and severe reactions in more than 80 others.

"There's no need to waste bullets on him. Just feed him the fake medicines he approved. That'll kill him," said one angry net surfer on sohu.com.

On the other hand, Chinese criminal law takes a much more hard-nosed attitude to capital punishment than other countries. Over 100 countries have abolished the death penalty. Those that have retained the penalty only have 3 to 5, or at most 7 to 8 crimes that are punishable by death. In China, however, 68 crimes can lead to capital punishment, Cui said.

"The international trend is to limit death sentences. China should apply the death penalty less extensively," Cui said.

The death sentence for corrupt officials gives rise to difficulties in international cooperation in the fight against crime. Many corrupt officials manage to escape capital punishment by absconding abroad. The countries where they reside often refuse to extradite criminals to China for fear they may be executed.

"As a result, only those unable to go abroad are executed, whereas major criminals who escape overseas can evade the just punishment. Justice is not served over such circumstances," Cui said.

Furthermore, while it is understandable that angry citizens demand the death penalty for corrupt officials, executing malfeasants needs to be carefully considered, Cui said.

"In dealing with matters of life or death, it is the law, not people's outrage that justifies the death sentence," Cui said, adding that China should seriously consider reforming the death penalty.

The anti-corruption battle is complex, requiring sustained and systematic efforts. Killing a bunch of offenders is not the solution, said Cui.

Cui said China should consider joining the growing world trend toward the abolition of death penalty.

China should first amend its criminal law and reduce the number of capital crimes from 68 to 8. The court should be extremely cautious in handing out death sentences. Should there be any doubts about whether death is the appropriate penalty, the execution should always be dropped, suggested Cui.

"Currently, most Chinese people are unwilling to accept the abolition of the death penalty. But as the country moves forward and becomes more open, people will eventually change their minds," said Cui.

In fact, China began reforming laws relating to capital punishment at the beginning of the year.

On Jan. 1, 2007, the Supreme People's Court (SPC) recovered the right to review all death penalty decisions made by lower courts, ending its 24-year absence in approving China's execution verdicts.

The immediate result was a drop of 10 percent in the number of death sentences in the first five months of 2007 compared with the same period last year.

In June, China further pledged to make its death penalty system more transparent, demanding that more trials that could result in a death sentence be held in public. China's courts started recruiting more staff for death penalty reviews.

The Supreme People's Court is determined to ensure a balanced and standardized approach to the death penalty across the country.

(Xinhua News Agency July 13, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Ex-Drug Head Executed
Most Viewed >>
Questions and Answers More
Q: What kind of law is there in place to protect pandas?
A: In order to put the protection of giant pandas and other wildlife under the law, the Chinese government put the protection of rare animals and plants into the Constitution.
Useful Info
- Who's Who in China's Leadership
- State Structure
- China's Political System
- China's Legislative System
- China's Judicial System
- Mapping out 11th Five-Year Guidelines
Links
- Chinese Embassies
- International Department, Central Committee of CPC
- State Organs Work Committee of CPC
- United Front Work Department, Central Committee of CPC
主站蜘蛛池模板: 特级aaa毛片| 中文字幕在线亚洲精品| 狠狠色狠狠色综合伊人| 非洲黑人最猛性xxxx_欧美| 欧美激欧美啪啪片sm| 免费无码AV一区二区三区| 色综合天天综合网国产成人网| 国产日韩一区二区三区在线观看| 2022国产麻豆剧果冻传媒入口| 夜夜夜夜猛噜噜噜噜噜试看| 一个人看的www高清直播在线观看| 无码一区二区三区免费| 久久国产精品女| 日韩欧美成末人一区二区三区| 亚洲一区精品视频在线| 精品国产国产综合精品| 国产三级片在线观看| 麻豆女神吴梦梦| 国内最真实的XXXX人伦| a毛片在线看片免费| 日本三级网站在线线观看| 亚洲AV日韩精品久久久久久 | 男男(h)肉视频网站| 午夜免费理论片a级| 美女aⅴ高清电影在线观看| 国产a不卡片精品免费观看| 超时空要爱1080p| 国产午夜精品一区二区三区| 黄色一级黄色片| 在线观看污网站| gogogo高清在线播放| 女人张开腿让男人桶个爽| а天堂中文在线官网在线| 忘忧草日本在线播放www| 东北少妇不带套对白| 最新欧洲大片免费在线| 亚洲一久久久久久久久| 欧美freesex黑人又粗又大| 亚洲人成日本在线观看| 欧美一级在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区免费|