Indian environmentalists term Danish draft at Copenhagen summit unfair

By Jit Kumar
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua, December 10, 2009
Adjust font size:

As a major row erupted at the UN climate talks in Copenhagen over the leaking of a "secret" Danish draft, environmentalists in India have also vented out their anger, saying that it's "unfair" to impose legally binding targets on developing countries only.

"The leaked document seems to be the work of rich nations who wanted to abandon the existing Kyoto Protocol and its main objective of only industrialized nations taking on emissions targets. The draft means that developing countries like India and China would have to take on targets as the world cut emissions in half by 2050. This is unfair," said environmentalist D.K. Roy.

Though India has not officially reacted at the climate summit over the leaked document, the Danish proposal has prompted a furious rebuke to rich nations from some other developing nations. They pointed out that there are flaws in the 2020 targets.

"Industrialized nations like Japan's proposed 25 percent cut is meaningless as it had set conditions that would never be met, and the U.S. 'remarkable and notable' emissions target proposed only a provisional one percent cut below 1990 levels. The 10 billion U.S. dollar annual green fund works out to just two U.S. dollars per person across the planet," said Roy.

Another climate expert, Sunil Gupta, added: "The leaked documents reveal divisions between industrialized and developing countries over the shape of a possible new deal. The BASIC draft sees emission reductions from developed countries coming under the Kyoto Protocol, whereas the Danish draft envisages all measures coming under a single new agreement."

The secret Danish text sets out a vision of greenhouse gas emissions peaking globally by 2020, then declining. It specifies a50 percent emissions cut globally (from 1990 levels) by 2050.

"But, the figures mean that per-capita emissions in developing countries will remain below those in the west, promoting inequality," Gupta said.

The "unfair" document should not even exist, he said.

Days ahead of the Copenhagen Summit when India followed China in setting carbon targets by announcing that it will reduce its emissions intensity by 20 to 25 percent over the next decade, some environmentalists claimed that the decision only indicated that the country was giving in to pressure from the U.S., saying it's bad for climate.

"What we have to understand is not what the minister said but what the minister did not say -- that India could well be doing this to help the U.S. because the Americans want to shift the goalpost, they want to move from legally binding cuts to voluntary targets," the Director of Center for Science and Environment, Sunita Narain, told the media.

In a speech to Parliament on India's stand at the Copenhagen Climate Summit, Environment Minister Ramesh Jairam had said that his country will not submit to legally binding emission cuts but would voluntarily reduce its carbon emission intensity by 20 to 25percent of 2005 levels by 2020.

"India's per capita emissions will always remain low with that of developed nations. India will not submit to legally binding emissions," Ramesh had said last week.

PrintE-mail Bookmark and Share

Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品国产乱码久久久久久1区2区| 午夜精品福利视频| 日本a级作爱片金瓶双艳| 亚洲中文字幕不卡无码| 91精品欧美成人| 日韩免费福利视频| 免费成人福利视频| 色偷偷亚洲第一综合网| 国产女人的高潮国语对白| 大战孕妇12p| 国产精品视频全国免费观看| 99精品视频在线| 女人让男人桶app免费大全| 两根一进一出啊灌满了视频| 日日噜噜夜夜狠狠久久aⅴ| 久久婷婷是五月综合色狠狠| 最近中文字幕免费mv视频8| 亚洲欧洲av无码专区| 波多野结衣和乡下公在线观看| 全免费a级毛片免费看无码| 精品视频一区二区三区四区五区| 国产一区二区在线视频| 最新浮力影院地址第一页| 成人αv在线视频高清| 久久一本一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲av永久精品爱情岛论坛| 欧美人与性动交另类| 亚洲性无码av在线| 欧美黑人激情性久久| 亚洲经典在线中文字幕| 狠狠色丁香九九婷婷综合五月| 国产亚洲精品成人久久网站| 黄色三级免费看| 国产成人av在线影院| 黄页网址大全免费观看35| 国产成人高清亚洲一区久久| 黄色永久免费网站| 在线观看精品国产福利片100| h视频在线免费看| 天天爽夜夜爽人人爽一区二区|