Risk evaluation needed for GM food

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, April 29, 2012
Adjust font size:

The public's attitude toward genetically modified (GM) food should encompass a greater scope than simply supporting or objecting to the practice, said industry experts.

Despite continued controversy regarding its safety, GM food has found some supporters among the Nobel Prize laureates and other experts attending the third World DNA and Genome Week currently being held in Xi'an, capital of Shaanxi.

Richard Roberts, who was awarded the 1993 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, said GM food is even safer than traditional food, as its transgenic technology allows for the use of smaller amounts of water and pesticide in harsh environments.

Professor Ian Campbell from Australia's Peter MacCallum Cancer Center agreed, saying that no scientific evidence showing that GM food is harmful to people's health has been presented to date.

Campbell noted that campaigns against GM food in Europe have had political underpinnings.

GM food is widely believed to have the potential to solve global hunger and malnutrition problems, and to help protect and preserve the environment by increasing yields and reducing reliance on chemical pesticides and herbicides.

However, there are many challenges ahead, especially in terms of safety testing, regulation and international policy. Many of the forum's attendees called for more risk evaluation and stricter regulations for GM food and transgenic technology.

Martin Evans, a Nobel Prize winner in Physiology or Medicine in 2007, said the belief that transgenic technology is safe is not entirely founded and any conclusion should be based on testing results.

Dr. Alan Christoffels, director of the South African National Bioinformatics Institute, held the same view. He said that since GM food remains a controversial issue, scientists should continue testing to make it safer.

People do not trust GM food because transgenic technology is not well-regulated, said Michael Brower, a senior federal policy director from New York.

Brower said he believes the public should have the right to know which foods are genetically modified, adding that food producers should keep the process transparent for the public.

"The comprehensive evaluation of the risks of GM food and the strict regulation of the development of transgenic technology are vital," said Li Xing, a professor at Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University in Xi'an.

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 思思久久99热只有频精品66 | 尾野真知子番号| 久久精品无码专区免费| 欧美日韩三级在线观看| 伊人久久精品线影院| 91av在线导航| 51妺嘿嘿午夜福利| 少妇无码一区二区二三区| 久久久久亚洲av无码尤物| 最好看的2018中文字幕高清的 | 大色皇大久久大久久| 一级做a爰片性色毛片视频图片 | 成人国产永久福利看片| 久久久999国产精品| 日韩高清免费在线观看| 亚洲人成影院在线无码按摩店| 永久不封国产毛片AV网煮站| 偷天宝鉴在线观看| 精品国产A∨无码一区二区三区| 国产99在线a视频| 色综合久久综合网| 国产午夜无码福利在线看网站 | 国产日韩成人内射视频| www一区二区| 国产精品免费视频网站| 538在线视频二三区视视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第| chinese国产一区二区| 好吊妞视频这里有精品| 一本丁香综合久久久久不卡网站| 成人免费一区二区三区| 中文字幕专区高清在线观看| 无码人妻一区二区三区免费看| 久久久无码精品午夜| 日本高清不卡在线观看| 久久精品国产99国产精品亚洲| 日韩精品无码中文字幕一区二区| 亚欧色一区w666天堂| 最近韩国电影高清免费观看中文| 亚洲人成7777影视在线观看| 欧美大尺度电影|