--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates
Hotel Service


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the UN
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations Office at Geneva and other International Organizations in Switzerland
Foreign Affairs College
Institute of American Studies Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Bigger NATO Role in Afghanistan

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has decided to assume a more prominent role in Afghanistan, while the United States is considering a military fadeout in the post-war country in order to focus on Iraq, analysts said. 

NATO took a substantial step last week for expanding its current operation from the Afghan capital city to provinces, after Turkey and the Netherlands agreed to offer much-needed helicopters for the NATO-led peacekeeping force in Kabul.

 

Defence ministers of NATO members earlier agreed in principle to deploy the 5,500-strong International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan beyond the capital after a United Nations (UN) Security Council resolution authorized it to do so in October.

 

The resolution was a response to repeated requests by the Afghan transitional government and UN aid agencies, which feared that widespread lawlessness outside was jeopardizing the country's fledgling post-conflict peace and ongoing reconstruction process.

 

But NATO's decision is shadowed by the peacekeeping force's lack of equipment and its members' reluctance to contribute more troops.

 

Outgoing Secretary-General George Robertson has been pushing for more troops and equipment for ISAF, the alliance's first mission out of the traditional Europe theater in its 54-year history, warning that "Afghanistan and its problems will appear on all of our doorsteps" if NATO fails the mission.

 

NATO's takeover of command of the UN-mandated peacekeeping force here in mid-August was hailed as a symbol of its policy change to adapt to the new global security environment after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States.

 

Under a US-initiated program, NATO has agreed to deploy small civil-military teams, or Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs), across Afghanistan to help local security and reconstruction efforts, especially in areas where the Afghan central authority could not reach.

 

Meanwhile, the United States, which currently has over 8,000 troops here hunting for remnant fighters of the ousted Taliban and their al-Qaida allies, has proposed NATO's eventual takeover of its Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan.

 

US Secretary of State Colin Powell told NATO foreign ministers last Thursday at a meeting in Brussels that the alliance should consider the possibility of taking over all military operations in Afghanistan "at some point in the future."

 

However, US and Afghan officials said that a bigger NATO role in Afghanistan would not mean US troops would leave the country, where the ousted Taliban movement is waging a guerrilla war against the US-backed government and foreign troops with elusive explosions and ambushes.

 

"No matter what the role NATO might take, very likely the US would be a part of the NATO role," US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who first talked about the possibility of an all-out NATO takeover earlier this week, told reporters in Kabul last Thursday.

 

He said that there was no definition and timetable for NATO's future role in Afghanistan, and "It is simply a thought that NATO is discussing."

 

The Afghan Government so far has made no official response to the proposal, but a Defence Ministry spokesman said he did not expect a withdrawal by the United States from Afghanistan. "The strategic interests of the United States would not allow it to leave here, they require it to continue the war on terrorism," said General Zahir Azimi, adding that it would make no difference whether NATO or the United Stated leads the anti-terror war in Afghanistan.

 

Abdul Haq Wala, a former Afghan diplomat and Kabul University professor, said that the proposed handover to NATO would lighten the Pentagon's burden in Afghanistan and help it focus more on the troubled Iraq situation.

 

"While NATO's future role in Afghanistan would depend on the willingness of its members to send more troops and how it could deter Taliban attacks after integrating its peacekeeping mission with the anti-terror operation," said the analyst.

 

(China Daily December 8, 2003)

US Says It Regrets Killing Nine Afghan Children
Taliban Says They Killed UN Woman, Threatens Turk
UN Extends NATO-led Afghan Force Role Beyond Kabul
Terrorist Scenario Puts New-look NATO to the Test
Huge Blast Kills at Least Six near US Base in Afghanistan
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 色网站在线视频| 51国产偷自视频区视频| 精品美女在线观看| 国产成年无码久久久久毛片| 97久久精品无码一区二区天美| 学霸c了我一节课| 中文字幕理伦午夜福利片| 正在播放西川ゆい在线| 免费观看毛片视频| 亚洲综合五月天欧美| 国内精品一卡2卡3卡4卡三卡| www.米奇777.com| 成人18在线观看| 久久99久久99精品免观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区免费看| 伊人蕉久中文字幕无码专区| 91精品免费看| 国产精品久久一区二区三区| 一个人看的www片免费| 成年女人免费视频| 亚洲人色大成年网站在线观看| 综合欧美一区二区三区| 国产亚洲av综合人人澡精品| 91香蕉视频污在线观看| 国产的一级毛片完整| 足恋玩丝袜脚视频免费网站| 国产色无码精品视频国产| 99九九精品免费视频观看| 日本b站一卡二不卡三卡四卡| 亚洲成a人v欧美综合天堂麻豆| 热久久视久久精品18国产| 国产三级a三级三级| 69女porenkino| 在厨房里被挺进在线观看| 中文字幕视频在线| 日本人护士免费xxxx视频| 久久大香香蕉国产| 日韩在线观看视频网站| 久久综合久综合久久鬼色| 晚上睡不着正能量网址入口| 亚洲综合五月天|