--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates
Hotel Service


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the UN
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations Office at Geneva and other International Organizations in Switzerland
Foreign Affairs College
Institute of American Studies Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Bush Doctrine: Hegemony Claim or Jungle Law
Professor of politics at La Trobe University Robert Manne criticized Monday the Bush Doctrine as hegemony claims or jungle law.

The professor published on The Sydney Morning Herald an article titled "Kill first, ask questions later," in which he said the new idea of the pre-emptive strike in reality is a strategy not of pre-emptive strike but of preventive war because the Bush doctrine proposes military action against "rogue states" when no threat to the United States is imminent.

"For a preventive war to be launched, a state needs only imagine itself to be under threat. With such an idea, the line between self-defense and aggression becomes hopelessly blurred," he said.

The professor analyzed, "The danger of this conflation of pre-emptive strike and preventive war is aggravated precisely by the fact that the Bush doctrine makes it clear that the United States reserves to itself the right to strike unilaterally, without mandate from the established processes of the United Nations. Under the new doctrine, then, the United States may not only go towar on the basis of an imagined threat. It also arrogates to itself the right to decide alone when such a threat exists."

"At the center of the doctrine, a huge conceptual hole appears.Does the United States, as the world hegemony, alone possess the sovereign right to act unilaterally against a supposed threat to its security by prosecuting a preventive war, or does an identicalright exist for other states?" he asked and concluded "If the right does not exist for others, the Bush doctrine amounts to an almost formal claim to US world hegemony. If, on the other hand, all states possess the same right, the Bush doctrine opens the warto the return of the jungle, where the powerful have the capacity to impose their will."

As the United States steps up its war preparation against Iraqand the Australian government inclines to support it, anti-war voice gets higher in the country. On Saturday, about 1,000 Sydney residents launched a large-scale protest warning the government not to involve in any war on Iraq. On Friday, a group of 450 activists announced they had formed a "No War On Iraq Coalition." On Thursday, three former prime ministers and one former governor-general along with other former political and military officials issued a public letter opposing a US unilateral military action against Iraq.

(Xinhua News Agency September 30, 2002)

Military Supremacy at Core of US Security Goals
Sept. 11 Terror Attacks Reshape US Security Strategy
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 麻豆国产精品va在线观看不卡 | 欧美高清video| 午夜内射中出视频| 超清av在线播放不卡无码| 国产欧美一区二区精品久久久| 91在线国内在线播放老师| 天堂中文字幕在线| 一个人看的www高清频道免费| 撅起小屁股扒开调教bl| 久久九九久精品国产| 最近中文字幕电影大全免费版| 亚洲国产综合人成综合网站00| 波多野结衣系列电影在线观看| 免费中文字幕在线国语| 精品国产不卡在线电影| 四虎永久网址在线观看| 西西人体大胆扒开瓣| 国产在线无码视频一区二区三区 | 国产精品爆乳在线播放第一人称| 99久久免费国产精品特黄| 天天爽天天爽夜夜爽毛片| xyx性爽欧美| 好男人社区www在线观看| 中午字幕在线观看| 成人综合视频网| 中文字幕日韩精品在线| 日本三级韩国三级欧美三级 | 中文字幕在线视频网| 无遮挡亲胸捏胸激吻视频| 久久亚洲国产欧洲精品一| 日本黄页网站免费大全| 久久精品亚洲日本波多野结衣 | 十七岁免费观看高清| 精品无码无人网站免费视频| 啊灬啊灬啊灬快灬深用力点| 美女范冰冰hdxxxx| 四虎1515hh丶com| 羞羞答答xxdd影院欧美| 嗯~啊~哦~别~别停~啊老师| 老司机午夜电影| 同学麻麻下面好紧第一次|