--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates
Hotel Service


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
The Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the UN
Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the United Nations Office at Geneva and other International Organizations in Switzerland
Foreign Affairs College
Institute of American Studies Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Bush Doctrine: Hegemony Claim or Jungle Law
Professor of politics at La Trobe University Robert Manne criticized Monday the Bush Doctrine as hegemony claims or jungle law.

The professor published on The Sydney Morning Herald an article titled "Kill first, ask questions later," in which he said the new idea of the pre-emptive strike in reality is a strategy not of pre-emptive strike but of preventive war because the Bush doctrine proposes military action against "rogue states" when no threat to the United States is imminent.

"For a preventive war to be launched, a state needs only imagine itself to be under threat. With such an idea, the line between self-defense and aggression becomes hopelessly blurred," he said.

The professor analyzed, "The danger of this conflation of pre-emptive strike and preventive war is aggravated precisely by the fact that the Bush doctrine makes it clear that the United States reserves to itself the right to strike unilaterally, without mandate from the established processes of the United Nations. Under the new doctrine, then, the United States may not only go towar on the basis of an imagined threat. It also arrogates to itself the right to decide alone when such a threat exists."

"At the center of the doctrine, a huge conceptual hole appears.Does the United States, as the world hegemony, alone possess the sovereign right to act unilaterally against a supposed threat to its security by prosecuting a preventive war, or does an identicalright exist for other states?" he asked and concluded "If the right does not exist for others, the Bush doctrine amounts to an almost formal claim to US world hegemony. If, on the other hand, all states possess the same right, the Bush doctrine opens the warto the return of the jungle, where the powerful have the capacity to impose their will."

As the United States steps up its war preparation against Iraqand the Australian government inclines to support it, anti-war voice gets higher in the country. On Saturday, about 1,000 Sydney residents launched a large-scale protest warning the government not to involve in any war on Iraq. On Friday, a group of 450 activists announced they had formed a "No War On Iraq Coalition." On Thursday, three former prime ministers and one former governor-general along with other former political and military officials issued a public letter opposing a US unilateral military action against Iraq.

(Xinhua News Agency September 30, 2002)

Military Supremacy at Core of US Security Goals
Sept. 11 Terror Attacks Reshape US Security Strategy
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 羞羞视频在线播放| 日韩爱爱小视频| 性色av无码不卡中文字幕| 久久精品免费全国观看国产| 欧美性色欧美a在线播放| 人人添人人澡人人澡人人人爽| 精精国产XXXX视频在线播放| 国产产无码乱码精品久久鸭| 黄色永久免费网站| 国产精品入口麻豆完整版| 99免费在线视频| 奶特别大的三级日本电影| 免费a在线观看| 美女扒开尿口让男生捅| 国产亚洲欧美在线播放网站| 91丁香亚洲综合社区| 国产精品免费电影| 91视频app污| 在线观看成人免费| a级毛片高清免费视频在线播放 | 免费观看美女用震蛋喷水的视频| 国产精品自在欧美一区| 97人妻人人揉人人躁人人| 在线观看免费人成视频| aaaa级少妇高潮大片在线观看| 好吊妞欧美视频免费| 一区二区三区在线|日本| 成人a毛片视频免费看| 中文乱码字字幕在线第5页| 成年人网站黄色| 中文字幕亚洲欧美一区| 手机看片1024旧版| 中文字幕日本一区| 无限看片在线版免费视频大全| 久久久亚洲精品视频| 日本午夜小视频| 久久久久久久久人体| 无码人妻精品一区二| 中文字幕无码不卡免费视频| 成年美女黄网站色| 中文字幕久精品免费视频|