RSSNewsletterSiteMapFeedback

Home · Weather · Forum · Learning Chinese · Jobs · Shopping
Search This Site
China | International | Business | Government | Environment | Olympics/Sports | Travel/Living in China | Culture/Entertainment | Books & Magazines | Health
Home / International / International -- Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Italy's electoral system cripples government stability
Adjust font size:  ZoomIn ZoomOut

Italy's Senate Speaker Franco Marini has began talks aimed at seeking support for overhauling the country's election system as the current one failed again to deliver the country from its chronic woes of short-lived governments.

 

The European power witnessed the collapse of its 61st government in 63 years since the end of World War II. The center-left cabinet led by Prime Minister Romano Prodi was brought down late last month after the ex-European Commission president lost a confidence vote in the Senate.

 

The downfall of the 20-month-old government has brought Italy's electoral system back to the limelight, a system widely blamed for producing fragile and ineffective governments for years.

 

Taking the situation at its face value, the breakdown of Prodi's government was caused by the defections of two small coalition partners, which stripped him of a razor-thin majority in the 315-seat upper house.

 

However, a close scrutiny of the existing electoral system is likely to show that it should probably take much of the blame.

 

HOW ELECTORAL SYSTEM WORKS IN ITALY

 

A republic with a bicameral parliamentary system, Italy has a 630-seat Chamber of Deputies, the lower house, and a 315-seat Senate, the upper house. A government can stay in power only when it secures confidence from both houses, which enjoy equal powers.

 

A mixed electoral system was introduced in Italy beginning 1993 till 2005, allocating 75 percent of the seats under a majority system, with the remaining one quarter given by proportional representation (PR).

 

Under the majority, or plurality, system, the party garnering the most votes wins; under the PR, a party's number of seats in parliament is in proportion to the percentage of votes it won in elections.

 

In the parliamentary elections held on April 9-10, 2006, a full-blown PR electoral system replaced the mixed one. Each elector casts one vote for a closed party list, from which electors cannot choose individual candidates.

 

The PR system used in 2006 also brought with it a "majority prize". It awarded "bonus" seats to winners on a national basis in the lower house and regionally in the Senate. Take the lower house for example, the bonus means that a party or a coalition, obtaining the most votes but still short of 55 percent of parliament seats, will be given extra seats till its number of seats increases to 340, or 55 percent, out of a total of 618 seats.

 

WHY CURRENT ELECTORAL SYSTEM ERODES GOVERNMENT LONGEVITY

 

The main flaw of the current proportional representation system is that it produces highly fragmented parliaments and unsteady coalitions in government. For example, between 1945 and 1993 when the PR system prevailed, Italy saw a total of 52 governments come and go, with each cabinet lasting less than one year on average into their five-year term.

 

What's striking about Italy's tempered PR system is that the "majority prize" gives small parties a disproportional sway power. They often demand seats as a condition for joining one coalition or another. Eager to win, bigger coalition partners would, in all likelihood, bow to this demand.

 

Consequently, smaller parties could secure parliament seats even if they have failed to reach the 4-percent threshold. A single party has to collect at least four percent of the vote in elections to enter parliament.

 

With cobbling together a viable coalition as the top priority, bigger coalition partners often concentrate on how to woo small parties to jump aboard, while putting off more crucial tasks of sorting out political differences with their smaller partners.

 

However, these differences often turn out to be too difficult to bridge, presenting a daunting task for a coalition to hold itself together.

 

In the latest case, deep divides over a wide range of issues, like foreign policy, fiscal policy and electoral reform, had long been simmering within Prodi's ruling coalition, which brought together parties ranging from Christian democratic centrists to left wingers, among over 20 individual parties with seats in parliament.

 

The crisis which ultimately brought down Prodi's government was triggered by the withdrawal of the Udeur party and the centrist Liberal Democrats. The Udeur party chief and ex-Justice Minister, Clemente Mastella, made the move after his wife was put under house arrest and himself named in a corruption probe.

 

Mastella cited differences on a number of issues including electoral reform, a proposed referendum on the current electoral law and relations with the new Democratic Party (DP), which was created through the merger of the Democratic Left and centrist Daisy parties.

 

PROSPECTS FOR ELECTORAL SYSTEM OVERHAUL

 

Shortly after the downfall of Prodi's government, Italian President Giorgio Napolitano began sounding out views on whether to install an interim government and change the electoral law before calling a snap election.

 

Politicians are equally divided on the issue. Prodi's biggest ally, the new Democratic Party (DP), led by Rome Mayor Walter Veltroni, wants the electoral law changed before early elections are held.

 

While at the other end of the political spectrum, Silvio Berlusconi, already twice premier and beat by Prodi narrowly in 2006, is eager for a snap election as soon as possible, which polls projected he is probably to win, seizing on popular support after the Prodi cabinet's demise.

 

Some party leaders say that while many changes have already been made to the electoral system in the past, none of them have succeeded in bringing an end to government instability in the country.

 

Small parties are fiercely opposed to the proposed reform, which would favor larger parties and diminish the influential clout enjoyed by smaller ones.

 

However, ordinary Italians present a more united front on this issue. Over 600,000 people signed a petition for a referendum on electoral reform, a demand which secured the backing from the constitutional court on January 16.

 

The referendum is slated for mid-April and mid-June, during which, according to an opinion poll released on January 21, over 75 percent of Italians would vote a "yes" to scrap the "bonus" system, among other changes.

 

One possible scenario is a return to the mixed system used from1993 to 2005, which helped create the current "bipolar" system of broad coalitions and may be helpful in pushing the country gradually toward a "two-party" system with two political blocs alternating in power.

 

But what is certain is that a prolonged political limbo would hurt the Eurozone’s third largest economy, as the world is bracing for a looming global recession.

 

(Xinhua News Agency February 1, 2008)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Username   Password   Anonymous
 


China Archives
Related >>
- Prodi government fails due to divisions
- Italian president opens meeting on gov't crisis
- Prodi loses confidence vote
- Prodi wins confidence vote in Lower House
Most Viewed >>
-China investigates Japanese food poisoning incident
-FM: Taiwan, Nansha Islands all Chinese territory
-AU summit opens in Ethiopian capital
-20 killed in blast at fireworks factory
-US-sponsored second round of climate change talks kick off
> Korean Nuclear Talks
> Reconstruction of Iraq
> Middle East Peace Process
> Iran Nuclear Issue
> 6th SCO Summit Meeting
Links
- China Development Gateway
- Foreign Ministry
- Network of East Asian Think-Tanks
- China-EU Association
- China-Africa Business Council
- China Foreign Affairs University
- University of International Relations
- Institute of World Economics & Politics
- Institute of Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies
- Institute of West Asian & African Studies
- Institute of Latin American Studies
- Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies
- Institute of Japanese Studies
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback

Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號

主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久亚洲av波多野结衣| 亚洲激情第二页| 青青青青草原国产免费| 欧美激情一区二区三区蜜桃视频| 同桌一直在夹腿还嗯啊的叫| 韩国在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品91av| 720lu国内自拍视频在线| 天天干在线播放| 一区二区高清在线观看| 扒开女同学下面粉粉嫩嫩| 久久夜色精品国产亚洲| 最近中文字幕免费mv视频7| 亚洲大尺度无码无码专区| 污视频免费看网站| 伊人久久精品无码AV一区| 精品人妻VA出轨中文字幕| 国产a级午夜毛片| 露脸国产自产拍在线观看| 国产成人精品亚洲一区| www.色日本| 国产精品成人久久久久久久| 91欧美精品激情在线观看最新| 在线无码VA中文字幕无码| a级毛片在线免费观看| 奶水哺乳理论电影| 一本伊大人香蕉在线观看| 成人福利视频app| 中文字幕亚洲乱码熟女一区二区 | 欧洲乱码专区一区二区三区四区| 亚洲手机中文字幕| 欧美综合自拍亚洲综合图| 亚洲精品你懂的| 毛茸茸性XXXX毛茸茸毛茸茸 | 在线免费观看国产视频| a网站在线观看| 天堂在线观看中文字幕| chinesefemdom444| 在线视频日韩欧美| 999国产精品999久久久久久| 国语自产精品视频在线看|