RSSNewsletterSiteMapFeedback

Home · Weather · Forum · Learning Chinese · Jobs · Shopping
Search This Site
China | International | Business | Government | Environment | Olympics/Sports | Travel/Living in China | Culture/Entertainment | Books & Magazines | Health
Home / International / International -- News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Bush defends policies on interrogating terrorism suspects
Adjust font size:

US President George W. Bush defended Friday the government policies on detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects as successful and lawful.

"When we find somebody who may have information regarding an attack on America, you bet we're going to detain them, and you bet we're going to question them," he said in his official Oval Office.

US President George W. Bush pauses during remarks on torture and the economy in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, October 5, 2007.

Bush made the remarks following a report in Thursday's editions of The New York Times disclosed that shortly after former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales took over the Justice Department in 2005,two memos were issued to authorize the use of extreme interrogation tactics on terror suspects, which has been denied by the White House and the Justice Department.

"The American people expect us to find out information, this actionable intelligence, so we can help protect them. That's our job," he said. "This government does not torture ... we stick to US law and our international obligations."

Highly trained professionals were assigned to question the "extremists and terrorists," and they have already obtained information from "these high-value" detainees that help protect Americans, Bush said.

Meanwhile, the White House "have been fully disclosed" the interrogation techniques to Congress, he added.

After the Justice Department publicly declared torture "abhorrent" in December 2004, the first memo was issued that authorized the use of head slaps, freezing temperatures and simulated drownings, known as water boarding, in interrogating terror suspects, said The New York Times report.

The second Justice opinion was issued later in the year while Congress was working on an anti-torture bill.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said Tuesday in a statement that neither of the two memos violated the December 2004legal opinion that still remains in effect. "Neither (former) Attorney General Gonzales nor anyone else within the department modified or withdrew that opinion."

However, Senate and House Democrats Thursday demanded to see the reported secret memos that authorized painful interrogation tactics against terror suspects.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller sent a letter to the Justice Department saying the government would risk its credibility if not turning over the documents to Congress. "Why should the public have confidence that the program is either legal or in the best interests of the United States?" he questioned in the letter.

The American Civil Liberties Union also called for an independent investigation on the Justice Department's torture opinions, calling the memos "a cynical attempt to shield interrogators from criminal liability and to perpetuate the administration's unlawful interrogation practices."
 
(Xinhua News Agency October 6, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Username   Password   Anonymous
 


China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
-Chinese compatriots withdraw from Chad
-Gabon's Jean Ping elected as AU Commission chief
-Baghdad market blasts kill 72
-World Bank chief to assess floods in Zambia
-Kenya's rivals agree to end deadly violence
> Korean Nuclear Talks
> Reconstruction of Iraq
> Middle East Peace Process
> Iran Nuclear Issue
> 6th SCO Summit Meeting
Links
- China Development Gateway
- Foreign Ministry
- Network of East Asian Think-Tanks
- China-EU Association
- China-Africa Business Council
- China Foreign Affairs University
- University of International Relations
- Institute of World Economics & Politics
- Institute of Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies
- Institute of West Asian & African Studies
- Institute of Latin American Studies
- Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies
- Institute of Japanese Studies
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback

Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號

主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天看天天摸色天天综合网| 日本天码aⅴ片在线电影网站| 好吊妞视频haodiaoniucom| 久久精品免费视频观看| 欧美亚洲国产日韩电影在线 | 韩国免费一级片| 国产真实强被迫伦姧女在线观看| 91中文字幕yellow字幕网| 天堂资源在线中文| 一日本道a高清免费播放| 欧美性xxxx极品高清| 亚洲色欲色欲综合网站| 精品一区二区在线观看1080p| 噗呲噗呲好爽轻点| 色在线亚洲视频www| 国产亚洲精品欧洲在线观看| 黑人巨大人精品欧美三区| 天堂网www天堂在线资源| 一级女人18片毛片免费视频| 成年性生交大片免费看| 久久中文字幕人妻丝袜| 日本边添边摸边做边爱的网站 | 99久久精品久久久久久清纯| 好大好硬好深好爽想要之黄蓉| 下载一个黄色录像| 成人片黄网站色大片免费| 中日韩精品电影推荐网站| 日本天码aⅴ片在线电影网站| 久久精品午夜福利| 日韩欧美在线播放| 久人人爽人人爽人人片AV| 最新国产精品自在线观看| 亚洲av无码不卡久久| 极品色αv影院| 亚洲av无码精品色午夜果冻不卡| 欧美中日韩免费观看网站| 亚洲国产精品成人久久| 欧美日本一区二区三区道| 亚洲日产2021三区| 欧美大片一区二区| 亚洲区中文字幕|