RSSNewsletterSiteMapFeedback

Home · Weather · Forum · Learning Chinese · Jobs · Shopping
Search This Site
China | International | Business | Government | Environment | Olympics/Sports | Travel/Living in China | Culture/Entertainment | Books & Magazines | Health
Home / International / International -- News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Bush defends policies on interrogating terrorism suspects
Adjust font size:

US President George W. Bush defended Friday the government policies on detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects as successful and lawful.

"When we find somebody who may have information regarding an attack on America, you bet we're going to detain them, and you bet we're going to question them," he said in his official Oval Office.

US President George W. Bush pauses during remarks on torture and the economy in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, October 5, 2007.

Bush made the remarks following a report in Thursday's editions of The New York Times disclosed that shortly after former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales took over the Justice Department in 2005,two memos were issued to authorize the use of extreme interrogation tactics on terror suspects, which has been denied by the White House and the Justice Department.

"The American people expect us to find out information, this actionable intelligence, so we can help protect them. That's our job," he said. "This government does not torture ... we stick to US law and our international obligations."

Highly trained professionals were assigned to question the "extremists and terrorists," and they have already obtained information from "these high-value" detainees that help protect Americans, Bush said.

Meanwhile, the White House "have been fully disclosed" the interrogation techniques to Congress, he added.

After the Justice Department publicly declared torture "abhorrent" in December 2004, the first memo was issued that authorized the use of head slaps, freezing temperatures and simulated drownings, known as water boarding, in interrogating terror suspects, said The New York Times report.

The second Justice opinion was issued later in the year while Congress was working on an anti-torture bill.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said Tuesday in a statement that neither of the two memos violated the December 2004legal opinion that still remains in effect. "Neither (former) Attorney General Gonzales nor anyone else within the department modified or withdrew that opinion."

However, Senate and House Democrats Thursday demanded to see the reported secret memos that authorized painful interrogation tactics against terror suspects.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller sent a letter to the Justice Department saying the government would risk its credibility if not turning over the documents to Congress. "Why should the public have confidence that the program is either legal or in the best interests of the United States?" he questioned in the letter.

The American Civil Liberties Union also called for an independent investigation on the Justice Department's torture opinions, calling the memos "a cynical attempt to shield interrogators from criminal liability and to perpetuate the administration's unlawful interrogation practices."
 
(Xinhua News Agency October 6, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Username   Password   Anonymous
 


China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
-Chinese compatriots withdraw from Chad
-Gabon's Jean Ping elected as AU Commission chief
-Baghdad market blasts kill 72
-World Bank chief to assess floods in Zambia
-Kenya's rivals agree to end deadly violence
> Korean Nuclear Talks
> Reconstruction of Iraq
> Middle East Peace Process
> Iran Nuclear Issue
> 6th SCO Summit Meeting
Links
- China Development Gateway
- Foreign Ministry
- Network of East Asian Think-Tanks
- China-EU Association
- China-Africa Business Council
- China Foreign Affairs University
- University of International Relations
- Institute of World Economics & Politics
- Institute of Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies
- Institute of West Asian & African Studies
- Institute of Latin American Studies
- Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies
- Institute of Japanese Studies
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback

Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號

主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本肉动漫无遮挡无删减在线观看| 激情五月婷婷网| 国产成人免费手机在线观看视频| 99久久99久久精品国产片果冻 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜躁2021| 中文字幕永久视频| 日韩加勒比在线| 亚洲av成人精品网站在线播放 | 果冻传媒mv在线| 亚洲日韩乱码中文字幕| 波多野结衣教师6| 佐佐木明希哔哩哔哩| 精品午夜一区二区三区在线观看| 无码专区国产精品视频| 乱码一乱码二乱码三新区| 窝窝午夜看片七次郎青草视频| 国产三级精品三级在线观看 | 成人影院在线观看视频| 久久久一本精品99久久精品66| 日韩欧美高清色码| 亚洲av女人18毛片水真多| 欧美在线视频免费观看| 亚洲精品tv久久久久久久久久| 玉蒲团之风雨山庄| 免费澳门一级毛片| 精品无码一区二区三区爱欲| 国产浮力影院在线地址| 中文字幕在线看片| 欧美另类xxxx图片| 亚洲日韩中文字幕天堂不卡 | eeuss影院免费直达入口| 日韩欧美在线播放视频| 亚洲一区二区三区无码国产| 欧美性黑人极品hd| 亚洲成人在线电影| 欧美成人观看免费完全| 亚洲欧洲精品成人久久曰影片| 欧美精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲欧美日韩综合一区| 永久免费无内鬼放心开车| 亚洲第一成年免费网站|