Home / Government / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Break up Monopolies
Adjust font size:

The news that employees in monopoly sectors enjoy much higher salaries than their counterparts in other sectors will be an issue for some time, given the rising anti-monopoly sentiment nationwide.

As the national labor regulation body revealed, the salary gap between workers in monopolized and competitive industries is not only stunningly big, but widening rapidly in recent years.

Many are wondering why those in monopoly sectors earn much more just for working in that industry, and not for increased hours or higher skill sets. Such a sentiment, if unresolved, will dampen social morale.

The government has promised to take steps in the coming five years toward breaking up monopolies, as mapped out in its 11th Five-Year Plan (2006-10). This is the right place to start.

In discussing solutions to break up monopolies, anti-monopoly legislation is often proposed, which would likely play a vital role. Indeed, a viable and comprehensive legal framework would equip the nation's anti-monopoly efforts with strong legal support.

Given China's realities, the government can also play a significant role in curbing the monopoly sectors from grabbing exorbitant profits within existing legal framework.

Most of China's monopoly sectors are state-controlled. It is a legacy of the highly centralized planned economy. This renders the government regulators easier access to information and more convenience in carrying out its supervisory duty.

One of the regulatory duties of the government lies in preventing monopoly sectors from taking advantage of their market position to overcharge consumers. A 2000 investigation by central China's Hunan Province's price supervisory department revealed a 163 million yuan (US$20.37 million) overcharge by local power firms to customers. A 2004 audit in central China's Henan Province found its telecom sector overcharged consumers more than 100 million yuan (US$12.5 million).

Regulators in those regions were keeping up. It shows that technical barriers or lack of wisdom are not problematic and the government can detach itself with monopolized interests only if it gathers adequate political will.

Such a political commitment is indispensable in making the country's anti-monopoly strategies.

Encouraging competition, for example, is the ultimate way of breaking up monopolies. But the government sometimes sticks to price controls to tackle the problem, as shown in the medical service sector.

Such a methodology may encounter less pressure from monopolized interests, but is less effective in the long run.

(China Daily May 19, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Monopoly Law Has Holes
End 'Monopoly Welfare' by Law
Monopoly Days Are Over
Breakup of State Monopolies, End to Unfair Charges Urged
Breaking the Public Hospital Monopoly
Anti-monopoly Law Badly Needed
?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 老师你的兔子好软水好多的车视频 | 国产成人亚洲精品无码青青草原 | 亚洲精品成a人在线观看| 一级成人理伦片| 欧美午夜精品久久久久免费视| 免费h黄肉动漫在线观看| 老司机精品免费视频| 国产午夜精品一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲色图五月天| 国产精品无码素人福利不卡| 99精品在线视频| 日本不卡在线播放| 久久老色鬼天天综合网观看| 欧美人与动性行为视频| 午夜视频在线免费| 天堂va在线高清一区| 国自产拍亚洲免费视频| ffee性护士vihaos中国| 日韩免费无码一区二区视频 | 怡红院国产免费| 国精产品wnw2544a| av片在线播放| 日本免费精品视频| 久久精品国产精品亚洲精品 | 日本边添边摸边做边爱边| 亚洲av之男人的天堂| 欧美乱妇狂野欧美在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩在线一区| 法国性经典xxxxhd| 亚洲色婷婷一区二区三区| 色综合a怡红院怡红院首页| 国产精品社区在线观看| 99久久中文字幕伊人| 大桥未久aⅴ一区二区| japanese国产高清麻豆| 女教师巨大乳孔中文字幕| 一本大道久久东京热无码AV| 性欧美高清come| 一边摸一边叫床一边爽| 成人免费在线视频网站| 两个人看的视频播放www|