www.ccgp-fushun.com
November 22, 2002



War Cost: Nearly US$1Billion a Month

A US helicopter lost in Afghanistan a week ago cost up to twice as much as the government spends yearly on scenic byways. Each cruise missile is worth several American homes.

The total expense of the Afghan war may be nearly as hard to find as people hiding in Afghan caves. By one estimate, the military assault is costing US$500 million to US$1 billion a month - and above the US$1 billion in promised US economic assistance to Pakistan, and debt relief for the country.'

The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a private research group that closely examines the cost of war, offered that monthly figure. Precision is impossible without knowing more about how many bombs are being dropped and what is happening with US forces on the ground, among other variables.

Still, parts of the war are adding up: the estimated US$5,000 an hour to fly a Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber, the US$25,600 cost of one of the frequently used Joint Direct Attack Munition bombs, the top-of-the-line Tomahawk cruise missiles.

As for a running total, "It's very much ballpark," said Steven M. Kosiak, the center's director of budget studies. Some other analysts have projected higher costs.

Stretched over a year, the price of the war could be US$12 billion, half of what the federal government spends on medical research.

By comparison, the bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 cost the United States about US$3 billion.

The 1991 Persian Gulf War cost America an estimated US$61 billion, but all but about US$7 billion was reimbursed by allies. By some accounting methods, the United States may have even made a profit.

Munitions at the disposal of US forces in the Afghan war vary wildly in price.

From the bargain basement: the 500-pound M-117, dropped from a heavy bomber, for a mere US$300 apiece.

At the high end: Tomahawk cruise missiles costing US$600,000 to US$1 million each, many times more than the US$147,100 median price of an American home.

US officials said 50 Tomahawks alone were launched in the opening assault, some from British forces, making an expensive debut. Dependence on cruise missiles has lessened since then.

Pentagon spokeswoman Susan Hansen said it takes time to calculate costs above those normally associated with having forces abroad in peacetime.

"The Department of Defense will be collecting those figures but at this point, a month into the conflict, we don't have them," she said.

On the home front, a study has taken a stab at the costs of the September 11 terrorist attacks and all their fallout - an expense likely to dwarf the costs of the Afghan war.

Peter Navarro, an economist at the University of California in Irvine, calculated US$100 billion in costs so far, nearly half from lost productivity, sales, advertising dollars and airline revenue in the immediate aftermath. That is apart from stock market losses.

Long-term costs are so speculative and dependent on government policy that Navarro did not add them up.

But his calculations do include "terrorist tax" items costing billions to make flying safer. They include US$20 to US$40 an hour for the time each person wastes by going to the airport 90 minutes earlier.

"The stakes here are simply breathtaking," Navarro wrote in the report for the Milken Institute.

To assess the cost of the fighting overseas, budget analysts at least have the experience of past wars to draw from.

Kosiak came to his projection in two ways: one using costs of strike missions over Kosovo and Iraq and applying them to the current conflict, the other by adding up everything known about the Afghan campaign.

Altogether, he calculated that the first 25 days cost US$400 million to US$800 million.

Munitions used on the Taliban include 15,000-pound BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bombs, costing US$27,000 each. The bunker-busting GBU-37 costs US$231,000 apiece, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

America lost a Pave Low helicopter - valued at US$40 million, about double last year's budget for National Scenic Byways projects - in bad weather in Afghanistan, and an US$11 million Black Hawk chopper in Pakistan.

A sampling from private researchers of price tags and estimates concerning the Afghan war and terrorist attacks: War:

-JDAM bomb: US$25,600

-Tomahawk cruise missile: US$600,000-US$1 million

-MK-82 "dumb" bomb: US$600-US$1,400

-BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bomb: US$27,000

-GBU-37 bunker-busting bomb: US$231,000

-Black Hawk helicopter of type lost in Pakistan: US$11 million

-Pave Low helicopter of type lost in Afghanistan: US$40 million

-Hourly cost of flying Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber: US$5,000

-Estimated war cost per month: US$500 million-US$1 billion Attack Aftermath:

-Property damage: US$10-US$13 billion

-Lost economic output: US$47 billion

-Projected airline security: up to US$41 billion

-Economic stimulus package: US$100 billion in legislation passed by Republican-controlled House, US$66.4 billion in Senate plan favored by Democrats.

( China Daily 11/12/2001)

In This Series
References

Archive

Web Link


Copyright © 2001 China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲一区二区三区在线观看网站| 台湾佬中文222vvv娱乐网在线| A级毛片成人网站免费看| 放荡的女老板bd中文在线观看| 久久综合国产乱子伦精品免费 | 国产一区二区在线视频播放| 国产精品真实对白精彩久久| 国产精品美女免费视频观看| 99国产超薄丝袜足j在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香76| 中文字幕在线第二页| 日日摸日日碰夜夜爽亚洲| 久久精品99久久香蕉国产| 日韩精品视频在线观看免费 | 亚洲av永久无码精品三区在线4| 欧美日韩在线观看视频| 亚洲精品夜夜夜妓女网| 男人女人真曰批视频大全免费观看| 午夜爽爽爽视频| 老八吃屎奥利给原视频带声音的| 国产主播福利在线| 麻豆国产在线观看免费| 国产福利在线观看极品美女| 100部毛片免费全部播放完整| 国产色视频免费| 999久久久无码国产精品| 在线观看国产一区亚洲bd| a毛片免费视频| 天天插在线视频| bt自拍另类综合欧美| 女人18片免费视频网站| www.怡红院| 好男人好资源在线影视官网| 一区二区三区视频在线| 性欧美大战久久久久久久久| 东京热无码一区二区三区av| 成品煮伊在2021一二三久| 中文字幕在线免费看线人| 抱着cao才爽的视频| 中文字幕日韩哦哦哦| 我要打飞华人永久免费|