Home
Letters to Editor
Domestic
World
Business & Trade
Culture & Science
Travel
Society
Government
Opinions
Policy Making in Depth
People
Investment
Life
Books/Reviews
News of This Week
Learning Chinese
Court Ruling Favours US Firms in Domain Row

Shao Zongwei

The Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court yesterday ruled in favour of two US companies in separate disputes over the use of domain names.

Beijing-based Guowang Information Corporation (www.cinet.com.cn) was ordered to cancel its domain name www.dupont.com.cn, which it registered with the China Internet Network Information Centre in 1998, because it "violated the exclusive rights" of US firm Dupont, according to the court.

The court also ordered the Beijing Tide Electronic Group (www.tide.com.cn) to stop using its domain name because of a similar problem alleged by company Procter and Gamble.

The two cases are among the recent upsurge in disputes arising from the use of domain names. Sources with the court said such cases are mainly in Beijing and Shanghai. So far, more than 10 cases have been handled in the two cities.

Because of a lack of specific laws relating to such disputes, there have been arguments as to how these cases should be tried, officials said.

The judges in yesterday's two cases used the Trademark Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, contending that both Dupont and Tide are "reputed" trademarks and that registering them as domain names is unfair.

"Reputed trademarks enjoy high business value," said the court. "Even if they are used in unrelated products and services, there may still be misleading and confusing effects for consumers that will negatively affect the original value of the trademarks."

"We do not think that Guowang has violated the Trademark Law," said firm lawyer Shu Ziping. "No clause in the law stipulates that registering trademarks as domain names is a violation of rights. Besides, Guowang and Dupont are not in the same business."

Guowang, a company providing Internet services, has been brought to court by seven international companies over similar allegations. It has already lost three cases.

Shu said yesterday that the company will appeal to a higher court over the latest case.

"Domain names have some features of intellectual property so we judge them using the same regulations," said Luo Dongchuan, judge in the Guowang case. "Also, when we ruled that Guowang had violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, we emphasized the principle of good faith and fair competition."

(China Daily 11/22/2000)

New Rules on Telecom and Internet Content
China to Intensify Foreign IPR Protection
Copyright ? China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68996214/15/16
主站蜘蛛池模板: 公啊灬啊灬啊灬快灬深用| 国产无吗一区二区三区在线欢| 中文在线观看视频| 日韩国产精品99久久久久久| 亚洲性图第一页| 狠狠色狠狠色合久久伊人| 台湾佬中文娱乐网在线更新| 里番无修旧番6080在线观看| 国产极品大学生酒店| 2021国产精品久久久久| 在线观看国产小视频| 一二三四在线观看免费高清视频| 无码精品a∨在线观看中文| 久久精品九九亚洲精品| 杨幂被c原视频在线观看| 亚洲宅男精品一区在线观看| 波多野结衣妻奴| 人妻无码一区二区三区AV| 精品国产乱码久久久久久郑州公司| 成人精品一区二区不卡视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽快| 最近的免费中文字幕视频| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线网站 | 第272章推倒孕妇秦| 午夜亚洲乱码伦小说区69堂| 老师那里好大又粗h男男| 国产亚洲女在线精品| 韩国女主播一区二区| 国产在线观看91精品不卡| 精品香蕉在线观看免费| 国产精品igao视频网网址| 永久在线免费观看| 国产精品入口麻豆电影网| 2022天天躁夜夜燥| 国产精品第2页| 2018天天操天天干| 国产精品毛片无遮挡高清| 5g影讯5g探花多人运视频 | 欧美精品免费观看二区| 国产a毛片高清视| 色碰人色碰人视频|