--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates
Hotel Service
China Calendar


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies

Transparency to Help Stop Misuse of Funds

By any standards, Wednesday's report by Auditor-General Li Jinhua to the National People's Congress Standing Committee was a shocking revelation of the scope and extent of official misconduct in the use of public money.

Defying the popular belief that corruption is more prevalent at local levels, audit probes uncovered financial malpractice at 41 of the 55 surveyed departments in the central government and its affiliates.

The misused money amounted to 1.4 billion yuan (US$170 million), out of the 2003 budget.

Institutions under the State Forestry Bureau fabricated "anti-desertification projects" to cheat interest-deducted loans. The State Sports General Administration appropriated 131 million yuan (US$15.8 million) government funds earmarked for China Olympics Committee for residential buildings and allowance for its own staff. The State Power Corporation, where poor decision-making had caused 3.28 billion yuan (US$395 million) in direct and potential losses.

Though the sums at the disposal of local officials are considerably smaller, abuse of public money is just as outrageous in the provinces.

Large State-invested infrastructures are ready prey for corrupt officials.

In the construction of new embankment along the Yangtze River, where floods broke dams and embankments and killed thousands in 1998, officials colluded with builders to embezzle government investment. More than half of the projects surveyed are shoddy.

Despite their normal neglect of input in basic education, local officials obviously consider it a source for easy pickings. In the 50 counties inspected, 43 were found to have misappropriated or defaulted funds designated for local schools.

Even life-saving money in disaster-relief programmes could not escape their dirty hands.

While 9 out of 14 of the flood-hit counties in the Huaihe River valley exaggerated their losses to defraud government money, they defaulted and even embezzled subsidies for flood victims.

Li Jinhua's report followed the standard official formula that "the situation is generally good, but some problems deserve attention."

For each and every individual case, harsh punishment would serve as a perfect conclusion. But that should not blind us to the larger conundrum. What our auditor-general revealed was only a very incomplete picture. Broad corruption is brewing the suspicion that where there is public money, there is abuse.

While it is important to correct all the wrongs case by case, it is even more important to learn the motives behind this abuse. Why has it become so rampant?

The answer from our auditor-general was straightforward: the Ministry of Finance was not specific enough about where the money was to go in its budgetary reports, and the process of funds distribution lacked transparency.

In all the cases on Li's list, there were destinations for the money from the State coffer. More specific designations may help. But the effects are highly questionable given local officials' notorious expertise in countermeasures for State policies.

More essential is transparency.

The "economic person" hypothesis, which assumes universal human propensity for personal gains, has taught our leadership to face and cater to the general public's needs and wants.

People might be promoted to positions of power because of higher moral standards, but it is naive and dangerous to believe all in power represent higher moral standards.

Public servants are even more vulnerable to the temptations of personal gain because of the public resource and power at their disposal. For that reason, they should be subject to closer scrutiny.

All the cases of abuse in Li's report shared one thing in common -- lack of transparency.

The outcome might be quite different if the public had been appropriately informed of why and how a decision was made, how much and for what purpose public money was to be spent.

The darkness shrouding decision-making breeds corruption in government offices.

Unless we embrace with true sincerity the concept of government in the sunshine, there is no effective safeguard for our hard-earned deposits in the State's safe.

(China Daily June 25, 2004)

Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 无码日韩精品一区二区免费| 欧美裸体XXXX极品少妇| 日韩人妻不卡一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美高清在线| 福利一区二区在线| 啊灬啊灬啊灬喷出来了| 被公侵犯肉体的中文字幕| 国产污视频在线观看| 3d动漫h在线观看| 在线播放五十路乱中文| www.91av| 日韩福利小视频| 免费无码成人av在线播放不卡| 色碰人色碰人视频| 国产婷婷成人久久av免费高清| 中文字幕日韩丝袜一区| 娇喘午夜啪啪五分钟娇喘| 中文字幕在线视频网| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽不卡| 久久成人福利视频| 日韩欧美国产综合| 久草视频在线网| 最近最好的中文字幕2019免费| 亚洲午夜精品久久久久久浪潮 | 国产精成人品日日拍夜夜免费| 99国内精品久久久久久久| 天天爱天天做天天爽天天躁| yy22.tv夜月直播| 嫩b人妻精品一区二区三区| 一级做a爰片性色毛片新版的| 成人性生免费视频| 中文在线字幕中文字幕| 扒开双腿猛进湿润18p| 中文字幕影片免费在线观看| 无码av专区丝袜专区| 久久91综合国产91久久精品 | 免费a级毛片在线观看| 看看黄色一级片| 免费一级毛片清高播放| 男人精品网站一区二区三区| 人气排行fc2成影免费的|