Home / China / National News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
'Judicial Injustice' Targeted
Adjust font size:

Different yardsticks for applying the death penalty have led to "judicial injustice".

Zhang Jun, vice-president of the Supreme People's Court, acknowledged yesterday that uneven standards applied during mandatory second-instance trials by provincial high courts in cases involving the death penalty have led to problems during the review by the highest court.

"The Supreme People's Court will gradually unify standards for penalties for similar categories of criminal cases across the country," Zhang told a Beijing work conference attended by high court presidents.

Ni Shouming, the apex court's spokesman, told that different penalty criteria exist because of complex and complicated local conditions in the huge country, but are mainly for economic and drug-trafficking crimes.

For instance, a drug trafficker in Yunnan Province can be given capital punishment if the case involves 300 grams of drugs or more, while in neighboring Guizhou Province, 150 grams can attract the death penalty.

Ni said unified guidelines for pronouncing the death penalty in four categories of crimes - murder, robbery, drugs and intentional injury, which usually draw the largest number of death sentences - will be released within the year.

The move will be another major milestone in the reform of the judicial system after the Supreme People's Court took back the power to review and ratify all death sentences starting from January 1 this year.

In the early 1980s, the highest court began to grant provincial courts the authority to pronounce death sentences amid rising crime; but the practice has been widely criticized in recent years, especially after reports of miscarriage of justice.

Zhang said the review has reduced the number of death sentences in China, and "human rights protection is constantly improving".

He did not provide the number.

Last month, Beijing No 1 and No 2 intermediate people's courts said the number of death sentences in first trials resulting in immediate execution had dropped 10 percent year-on-year in the first five months of this year.

The Heilongjiang High People's Court is the first in the country to detail 13 circumstances for reference in dealing with cases of death penalty with a reprieve, in line with the principle "capital punishment should be reserved for only an extremely small number of serious offenders".

A total of 14 people in the province were given death penalty with a reprieve this year after they had been sentenced to death resulting in immediate execution in first trials.

Nan Ying, president of the court, said yesterday that no litigants sought appeals because they were satisfied with proceedings.

During the first five months of this year, 342,854 people were convicted by courts at all levels across the country, and 56,056 received sentences longer than five years. The figure includes life terms and executions.

(China Daily July 5, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
China Ratifies Treaty on Judicial Cooperation with New Zealand
Top Judge Calls for Fair Trials
Capital Cases Made More Transparent
China's Judicial Work in 2006
Senior Official Calls for Further Judicial Reform
Maritime Judicial System Established: Official
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 最近免费韩国电影hd无吗高清| 92国产精品午夜福利免费| 欧美精品在线免费| 国产亚洲综合久久| 97久久天天综合色天天综合色hd| 年轻人免费看电影网站| 亚洲av日韩综合一区久热| 精品亚洲麻豆1区2区3区| 国产欧美一区二区另类精品| 91精品久久久久久久久网影视| 护士撩起裙子让你桶的视频| 亚洲小说区图片区另类春色| 美女高清特黄a大片| 国产精品无码不卡一区二区三区 | 色偷偷91综合久久噜噜噜男男| 国产高清在线观看麻豆| 中文字幕中韩乱码亚洲大片| 欧美一级高清免费播放| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码蜜桃| 自拍偷在线精品自拍偷| 国模无码一区二区三区不卡| 中文字幕热久久久久久久| 校草让我脱了内裤给全班看| 伊人色综合久久天天| 精品国产免费观看| 国产午夜精品1区2区3福利| 69av免费视频| 少妇高潮无套内谢| 久久国产加勒比精品无码| 欧美日韩精品一区二区在线播放 | 99久在线观看| 成人女人a毛片在线看| 久热这里只有精品视频6| 欧美黑人肉体狂欢大派对| 可播放的欧美男男videos| 国产喷水女王在线播放| 国语自产精品视频在线第| 一级毛片看**在线视频| 成人自拍小视频| 中文字幕一二三四区2021| 日韩不卡高清视频|