Home / China / National News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
'Judicial Injustice' Targeted
Adjust font size:

Different yardsticks for applying the death penalty have led to "judicial injustice".

Zhang Jun, vice-president of the Supreme People's Court, acknowledged yesterday that uneven standards applied during mandatory second-instance trials by provincial high courts in cases involving the death penalty have led to problems during the review by the highest court.

"The Supreme People's Court will gradually unify standards for penalties for similar categories of criminal cases across the country," Zhang told a Beijing work conference attended by high court presidents.

Ni Shouming, the apex court's spokesman, told that different penalty criteria exist because of complex and complicated local conditions in the huge country, but are mainly for economic and drug-trafficking crimes.

For instance, a drug trafficker in Yunnan Province can be given capital punishment if the case involves 300 grams of drugs or more, while in neighboring Guizhou Province, 150 grams can attract the death penalty.

Ni said unified guidelines for pronouncing the death penalty in four categories of crimes - murder, robbery, drugs and intentional injury, which usually draw the largest number of death sentences - will be released within the year.

The move will be another major milestone in the reform of the judicial system after the Supreme People's Court took back the power to review and ratify all death sentences starting from January 1 this year.

In the early 1980s, the highest court began to grant provincial courts the authority to pronounce death sentences amid rising crime; but the practice has been widely criticized in recent years, especially after reports of miscarriage of justice.

Zhang said the review has reduced the number of death sentences in China, and "human rights protection is constantly improving".

He did not provide the number.

Last month, Beijing No 1 and No 2 intermediate people's courts said the number of death sentences in first trials resulting in immediate execution had dropped 10 percent year-on-year in the first five months of this year.

The Heilongjiang High People's Court is the first in the country to detail 13 circumstances for reference in dealing with cases of death penalty with a reprieve, in line with the principle "capital punishment should be reserved for only an extremely small number of serious offenders".

A total of 14 people in the province were given death penalty with a reprieve this year after they had been sentenced to death resulting in immediate execution in first trials.

Nan Ying, president of the court, said yesterday that no litigants sought appeals because they were satisfied with proceedings.

During the first five months of this year, 342,854 people were convicted by courts at all levels across the country, and 56,056 received sentences longer than five years. The figure includes life terms and executions.

(China Daily July 5, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
China Ratifies Treaty on Judicial Cooperation with New Zealand
Top Judge Calls for Fair Trials
Capital Cases Made More Transparent
China's Judicial Work in 2006
Senior Official Calls for Further Judicial Reform
Maritime Judicial System Established: Official
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品无码久久久久久久| 国产成人精品一区二区秒拍| 四名学生毛还没长齐在线视频 | 粗大白浊受孕h鞠婧祎小说| 国产又黄又硬又粗| 免费观看激色视频网站(性色) | 少妇无码av无码专区线| 亚洲人成在线播放| 毛片网站是多少| 伊人色综合一区二区三区| 精品国产欧美一区二区| 国产激情一区二区三区成人91| 东北少妇不戴套对白第一次| 日本丰满www色| 亚洲成人网在线观看| 老司机深夜网站| 国产精品无码久久av不卡| 99热这就是里面只有精品| 日本一区二区三区精品视频| 久久精品国产色蜜蜜麻豆| 欧美一区2区三区4区公司贰佰| 亚洲欧美日韩国产精品| 绿巨人晚上彻底放飞自己| 国产福利免费视频| 1区2区3区产品乱码免费| 国内精品久久人妻互换| 99国产小视频| 在线精品小视频| 丰满熟妇乱又伦在线无码视频| 日韩A无V码在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩国产成人| 泰国午夜理伦三级| 四虎AV永久在线精品免费观看| 雯雯的性调教日记h全文| 国产午夜不卡在线观看视频666| 高雅人妻被迫沦为玩物| 国产成人久久综合二区| 91精品啪在线观看国产18| 在线天堂bt种子| 99国产情在线视频| 国内精品一区二区三区最新|