Home / China / National News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
'Judicial Injustice' Targeted
Adjust font size:

Different yardsticks for applying the death penalty have led to "judicial injustice".

Zhang Jun, vice-president of the Supreme People's Court, acknowledged yesterday that uneven standards applied during mandatory second-instance trials by provincial high courts in cases involving the death penalty have led to problems during the review by the highest court.

"The Supreme People's Court will gradually unify standards for penalties for similar categories of criminal cases across the country," Zhang told a Beijing work conference attended by high court presidents.

Ni Shouming, the apex court's spokesman, told that different penalty criteria exist because of complex and complicated local conditions in the huge country, but are mainly for economic and drug-trafficking crimes.

For instance, a drug trafficker in Yunnan Province can be given capital punishment if the case involves 300 grams of drugs or more, while in neighboring Guizhou Province, 150 grams can attract the death penalty.

Ni said unified guidelines for pronouncing the death penalty in four categories of crimes - murder, robbery, drugs and intentional injury, which usually draw the largest number of death sentences - will be released within the year.

The move will be another major milestone in the reform of the judicial system after the Supreme People's Court took back the power to review and ratify all death sentences starting from January 1 this year.

In the early 1980s, the highest court began to grant provincial courts the authority to pronounce death sentences amid rising crime; but the practice has been widely criticized in recent years, especially after reports of miscarriage of justice.

Zhang said the review has reduced the number of death sentences in China, and "human rights protection is constantly improving".

He did not provide the number.

Last month, Beijing No 1 and No 2 intermediate people's courts said the number of death sentences in first trials resulting in immediate execution had dropped 10 percent year-on-year in the first five months of this year.

The Heilongjiang High People's Court is the first in the country to detail 13 circumstances for reference in dealing with cases of death penalty with a reprieve, in line with the principle "capital punishment should be reserved for only an extremely small number of serious offenders".

A total of 14 people in the province were given death penalty with a reprieve this year after they had been sentenced to death resulting in immediate execution in first trials.

Nan Ying, president of the court, said yesterday that no litigants sought appeals because they were satisfied with proceedings.

During the first five months of this year, 342,854 people were convicted by courts at all levels across the country, and 56,056 received sentences longer than five years. The figure includes life terms and executions.

(China Daily July 5, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
China Ratifies Treaty on Judicial Cooperation with New Zealand
Top Judge Calls for Fair Trials
Capital Cases Made More Transparent
China's Judicial Work in 2006
Senior Official Calls for Further Judicial Reform
Maritime Judicial System Established: Official
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 无码国模国产在线观看免费| 欧美性色欧美a在线播放| 国产乱子伦精品无码码专区| 青青草原在线视频| 在线免费观看一级毛片| 一级毛片在播放免费| 无码一区二区三区免费| 久久电影www成人网| 欧美XXXXXBBBB| 亚洲影视一区二区| 波多野结衣视频在线免费观看| 六月天丁香婷婷| 自拍偷拍校园春色| 国产亚洲精品拍拍拍拍拍| 国产jizz在线观看| 国产精品91在线播放| 2021国产精品视频网站| 国内精品影院久久久久| gdianav| 寂寞山村恋瘦子的床全在线阅读 | 九色国产在视频线精品视频| 欧美性xxxx极品高清| 亚洲欧美色鬼久久综合| 99aiav国产精品视频| 好男人视频社区www在线观看| 中国成人在线视频| 扒开女人双腿猛进入爽爽视频 | 奇米影视7777777| 一区二区三区91| 开心五月激情综合婷婷| 中文在线观看国语高清免费| 无人区免费高清在线观看| 久久久久99精品成人片试看| 日本全黄三级在线观看| 久久国产亚洲欧美日韩精品| 日韩在线一区高清在线| 久久精品国产一区二区三区肥胖| 日韩精品亚洲专区在线影视| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码| 最近最新2019中文字幕4| 亚欧洲精品在线视频免费观看|