Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
US Losing Cool Is No Way to Solve Problems
Adjust font size:

Yuan Peng

 

US Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez announced last Friday that the United States would slap punitive tariffs on glossy paper imported from China to protect American manufacturers from the impact of China's government-subsidized products.

 

This decision means the US would start levying 10.9 percent to 20.4 percent countervailing duties on China-made glossy paper. It would be the first time in 23 years that the US uses the countervailing act against a "non-market economy" such as China.

 

The explanation Gutierrez gave for this decision was that today's China is not what it was a few years ago and, as China has developed, the means for the US to ensure fair trade should be expanded as well.

 

This explanation is far from convincing. Previously the US did not apply the countervailing act on China because its economy was rather weak; whereas today it is necessary to punish China because it is more developed economically.

 

Does this mean the level of China's economic development will be the main criterion for the US to decide whether to employ punitive measures against China?

 

Another puzzling fact is that, since the US has never recognized China as a "market economy", why did it abandon the pragmatic approach pursued for more than 20 years on the issue of government subsidies for some Chinese industries?

 

By breaking with the usual practice, Washington is subjecting China to double injustice as it unfairly treats China as a "non-market economy" with punishment meant for "market economies". With this move the Bush administration has opened the door for other US industries such as steel and furniture to follow suit. This would very likely deal a heavy blow to normal economic and trade relations between the two countries.

 

What has prompted the US to make a move that defies the hidden rules on bilateral trade? The root cause is domestic politics. Since the beginning of this year, the trade subcommittee of the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee have held four hearings on issues including China's currency exchange rate, intellectual property rights, opening of China's financial market and the trade imbalance.

 

Democratic Senator Charles Schumer and Republican Senator Lindsey Graham are back again with a bill that "the president cannot veto" to force China to relax its control on the RMB exchange rate. Such topics are making the rounds again because the Democrat-controlled Congress wants to show off its influence by increasing pressure on the Bush administration to push China. Senator Schumer and his like-minded colleagues are eager to attract public attention by playing a remix of the RMB exchange rate oldie.

 

As the US presidential election campaigns heat up, neither the Democratic nor the Republican Party wants to be seen as indifferent to the growing trade deficit with China. They both hope to win over US voters by scoring against China.

 

Another important reason for the Bush administration to give up the usual practice of resisting Congressional pressure to launch unilateral actions against China is that the US side has failed to achieve any breakthrough in China-US strategic dialogue on economic or other issues. Even Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who is relatively soft on China, has become impatient.

 

The US government decided to use punitive measures against China this time as a response to domestic political pressure along with the hope of forcing China into more compromises before the second round of bilateral strategic dialogue on economy in Washington next month.

 

In fact, what is really behind the US Congress' repeated pestering and Washington's punitive measures is the erroneous interpretation of the development of Sino-US trade ties, its ultra-alarmist response to the growth of China's economic strength, and its attempt to shirk responsibility for failing to make correct policy adjustments.

 

Three trends in China's economic development in recent years have made the US uneasy. The first is the US trade deficit with China reaching US$232.5 billion, accounting for 30 percent of the country's total trade deficit. The second is China's foreign currency reserve exceeding US$1 trillion as it holds nearly US$300 billion worth of US treasury bonds. The third is the heavy impact on the New York Stock Exchange of the Shanghai stock market's sharp drop on February 28.

 

Faced with these numbers and facts, few US lawmakers looked for the causes in the fact that American consumers prefer spending to saving and that Washington had lost many opportunities to rebalance bilateral trade because of its insistence on over-politicizing bilateral trade ties, always blaming China. The lawmakers are only too ready to accuse China rather than search for ways to improve US competitiveness.

 

As China-US economic and trade relations become more mutually dependent, an increase in trade disputes, frictions and even conflicts will occur. This is a normal and natural process. Since China-US trade suffers from structural defects, it would be unrealistic to expect to cure all with one quick fix.

 

The establishment of the China-US Joint Committee on Economy and Trade and strategic dialogue on the economy were meant to limit friction and resolve differences. Rational dialogue was seen as the way to make bilateral economic and trade ties healthier and more stable. Losing one's cool and jumping to retaliation just because one round of talks failed to solve the problem will only damage normal bilateral trade relations and oneself.

 

The author is a researcher with the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations

 

(China Daily April 4, 2007)

 

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Ill-conceived US Tariff
US Trade Official 'Optimistic' About Bilateral Trade Ties

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號(hào)
主站蜘蛛池模板: 97国产免费全部免费观看| 亚洲欧美高清在线| 97久久精品无码一区二区| 日韩日韩日韩日韩日韩| 免费一级片在线| 欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 性欧美16sex性高清播放| 亚洲一级毛片在线播放| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产成人亚洲精品91专区高清| 三中文乱码视频| 欧美bbbbxxxx| 免费黄色软件在线观看| 成人午夜性视频欧美成人| 国产美女牲交视频| 中国黄色一级片| 日本久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲毛片基地日韩毛片基地| 皇后羞辱打开双腿调教h孕| 国产成人99久久亚洲综合精品| 182tv成人午夜在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级看三级| 久久99精品久久久久婷婷| 欧美精品亚洲精品日韩1818| 四虎永久免费地址在线网站| 亚洲综合第一区| 女人与公拘交酡过程高清视频| 久久综合桃花网| 激情欧美日韩一区二区| 国产亚洲福利精品一区二区| 69tang在线观看| 少妇中文字幕乱码亚洲影视| 久激情内射婷内射蜜桃| 欧洲亚洲国产精华液| 亚洲伊人久久大香线蕉啊| 男女18禁啪啪无遮挡| 国产亚洲精品美女久久久久| 韩日一区二区三区| 国产羞羞羞视频在线观看| 99久热只有精品视频免费看| 大胸校花被老头粗暴在线观看|