亚洲精品久久久久久一区二区_99re热久久这里只有精品34_久久免费高清视频_一区二区三区不卡在线视频

Home / English Column / Business (new) / In Industry / Real Estate Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Debate over Property Tax Heats up
Adjust font size:

As the government's latest wave of macro-control measures aimed at the housing sector unfolds, the debate about the immovable property tax is once again surfacing.

 

Although experts and analysts generally agree that the proposed tax could, to some extent, curb property speculation and rein in rising prices, and be applied sooner, they are divergent on how it should be levied.

 

Taxation policy has long been viewed as an effective tool to adjust the real estate market.

 

In a State Council executive meeting on May 17, the central government vowed to use a mix of credit, tax and land policy to cool the currently overheated housing market.

 

As of June 1, a 5.5 percent transaction tax is now being charged to people who sell their property within five years of purchase a policy many say is designed to discourage investment-oriented property demand.

 

But many experts say the immovable property tax, which is imposed on owners of properties, is more effective than the transaction tax to restrain property speculation.

 

"The property tax is an indispensable instrument to drive out excessive housing demand resulting from speculation and investment purposes," said Yi Xianrong, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

 

The property tax would increase property investors' costs, which would make some think twice before investing in property, Yi explained.

 

And some experts say the property tax could also help drive down housing prices.

 

Currently the land fee, which some estimate accounts for 40 percent of developers' costs, is calculated into construction costs, an arrangement that experts say leads to high property prices.

 

The developers will not have to pay the land fee if the property tax is levied, which is likely to result in the property price falling, experts say.

 

However, there are concerns that although homebuyers will pay less for property, they will have to pay more to maintain their houses, as they will have to pay the tax.

 

"It (the imposition of immovable property tax) will become a little bit easier for people to buy houses, but it will likely make it harder to maintain them," said a researcher with the Development Research Center (DRC), a government think tank.

 

"So the tax regime should be designed carefully in order not to add unbearable costs on to ordinary homeowners," the researcher added, declining to be named.

 

But experts are divided about how and when the proposed tax should be levied, such as on which property types the tax should be levied.

 

All household residential properties should be included in the tax category, according to a research paper on immovable property tax released by a cabinet-affiliated think tank last week.

 

The paper, jointly prepared by the DRC of the State Council and the US Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, a non-profit organization, proposed that a certain amount of household residential property should be exempted from the tax, in a bid to avoid adding to the living expenses of homebuyers.

 

The paper also proposed that properties used by government, military and diplomatic establishments, and other public property, should be exempted from the property tax.

 

And land used for agriculture and farmers' living quarters should also be exempted from the property tax, according to the research paper, which recommends the immovable property tax rate be set between 0.3 percent and 0.8 percent.

 

In comparison, in Vancouver, Canada, where property tax is a main source of local revenue, the property tax rate is set between 0.3 percent and 36 percent.

 

The differential tax rate is designed to keep the income gap from widening.

 

Property tax will be reduced by 30 percent to 50 percent for properties used by those older than 65, or retired servicemen or disabled people. Tax on other types of properties will be higher than 10 percent.

 

But some experts believe that the immovable property tax should largely be targeting those high-earners, "as this tax is an important means to balance the income gap," said Yin Bocheng, a researcher with the Finance Studies Centre at Fudan University.

 

In Vancouver, a much higher tax rate is applied on the second homes of its local citizens.

 

Properties for rental, villas and high-end apartments should be the first batch of properties to be levied with the immovable property tax, suggested Jia Kang, a researcher with a Ministry of Finance-affiliated research institute.

 

Though disagreement remains on taxable properties, experts agree that an adequate infrastructure should be put in place first if the property tax is to be well-implemented and effective.

 

"Before the tax is levied, there should be some basic infrastructure such as a detailed and accurate property registration database and a scientific land valuation method," said Yi Xianrong.

 

"Only when these preparations are done can the property tax be implemented efficiently," said Yi.

 

"The imposition of immovable property tax is a very complex issue," Xie Fuzhan, deputy director of the DRC, said at a symposium last week. "Only with good design can we reduce any possible glitches when the tax is really applied."

 

However, the need for prudence and adequate infrastructure should not constitute an excuse to indefinitely delay the imposition of immovable property tax, Yi stressed.

 

(China Daily June 6, 2006)

Debate over Property Tax Heats up

 

As the government's latest wave of macro-control measures aimed at the housing sector unfolds, the debate about the immovable property tax is once again surfacing.

 

Although experts and analysts generally agree that the proposed tax could, to some extent, curb property speculation and rein in rising prices, and be applied sooner, they are divergent on how it should be levied.

 

Taxation policy has long been viewed as an effective tool to adjust the real estate market.

 

In a State Council executive meeting on May 17, the central government vowed to use a mix of credit, tax and land policy to cool the currently overheated housing market.

 

As of June 1, a 5.5 percent transaction tax is now being charged to people who sell their property within five years of purchase a policy many say is designed to discourage investment-oriented property demand.

 

But many experts say the immovable property tax, which is imposed on owners of properties, is more effective than the transaction tax to restrain property speculation.

 

"The property tax is an indispensable instrument to drive out excessive housing demand resulting from speculation and investment purposes," said Yi Xianrong, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

 

The property tax would increase property investors' costs, which would make some think twice before investing in property, Yi explained.

 

And some experts say the property tax could also help drive down housing prices.

 

Currently the land fee, which some estimate accounts for 40 percent of developers' costs, is calculated into construction costs, an arrangement that experts say leads to high property prices.

 

The developers will not have to pay the land fee if the property tax is levied, which is likely to result in the property price falling, experts say.

 

However, there are concerns that although homebuyers will pay less for property, they will have to pay more to maintain their houses, as they will have to pay the tax.

 

"It (the imposition of immovable property tax) will become a little bit easier for people to buy houses, but it will likely make it harder to maintain them," said a researcher with the Development Research Center (DRC), a government think tank.

 

"So the tax regime should be designed carefully in order not to add unbearable costs on to ordinary homeowners," the researcher added, declining to be named.

 

But experts are divided about how and when the proposed tax should be levied, such as on which property types the tax should be levied.

 

All household residential properties should be included in the tax category, according to a research paper on immovable property tax released by a cabinet-affiliated think tank last week.

 

The paper, jointly prepared by the DRC of the State Council and the US Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, a non-profit organization, proposed that a certain amount of household residential property should be exempted from the tax, in a bid to avoid adding to the living expenses of homebuyers.

 

The paper also proposed that properties used by government, military and diplomatic establishments, and other public property, should be exempted from the property tax.

 

And land used for agriculture and farmers' living quarters should also be exempted from the property tax, according to the research paper, which recommends the immovable property tax rate be set between 0.3 percent and 0.8 percent.

 

In comparison, in Vancouver, Canada, where property tax is a main source of local revenue, the property tax rate is set between 0.3 percent and 36 percent.

 

The differential tax rate is designed to keep the income gap from widening.

 

Property tax will be reduced by 30 percent to 50 percent for properties used by those older than 65, or retired servicemen or disabled people. Tax on other types of properties will be higher than 10 percent.

 

But some experts believe that the immovable property tax should largely be targeting those high-earners, "as this tax is an important means to balance the income gap," said Yin Bocheng, a researcher with the Finance Studies Centre at Fudan University.

 

In Vancouver, a much higher tax rate is applied on the second homes of its local citizens.

 

Properties for rental, villas and high-end apartments should be the first batch of properties to be levied with the immovable property tax, suggested Jia Kang, a researcher with a Ministry of Finance-affiliated research institute.

 

Though disagreement remains on taxable properties, experts agree that an adequate infrastructure should be put in place first if the property tax is to be well-implemented and effective.

 

"Before the tax is levied, there should be some basic infrastructure such as a detailed and accurate property registration database and a scientific land valuation method," said Yi Xianrong.

 

"Only when these preparations are done can the property tax be implemented efficiently," said Yi.

 

"The imposition of immovable property tax is a very complex issue," Xie Fuzhan, deputy director of the DRC, said at a symposium last week. "Only with good design can we reduce any possible glitches when the tax is really applied."

 

However, the need for prudence and adequate infrastructure should not constitute an excuse to indefinitely delay the imposition of immovable property tax, Yi stressed.

 

(China Daily June 6, 2006)

 

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Property Tax Surge Ebbs
Shanghai to Tax Real Estate Speculators
?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
亚洲精品久久久久久一区二区_99re热久久这里只有精品34_久久免费高清视频_一区二区三区不卡在线视频
黄色另类av| 宅男66日本亚洲欧美视频| 欧美激情精品久久久久久变态 | 亚洲黄网站黄| 久久福利影视| 欧美在线播放高清精品| 午夜精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 一级成人国产| 中日韩男男gay无套| 日韩香蕉视频| 9久草视频在线视频精品| 亚洲精品乱码| 亚洲精品视频在线观看免费| 亚洲精品视频啊美女在线直播| 亚洲高清电影| 亚洲国产精品成人久久综合一区 | 精久久久久久| 在线国产日韩| 亚洲国产黄色片| 亚洲欧洲日本一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一区二区三区不| 亚洲日韩成人| 一本久道久久综合中文字幕| 中文无字幕一区二区三区| 一级日韩一区在线观看| 亚洲午夜激情网页| 亚洲在线播放电影| 欧美一区二区三区四区高清 | 久久成人av少妇免费| 久久久www成人免费精品| 久久精品亚洲一区二区| 久久久之久亚州精品露出| 久久亚洲精品一区| 美女视频黄a大片欧美| 欧美福利视频一区| 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区在线观看| 欧美色偷偷大香| 国产精品视频久久久| 国产一区 二区 三区一级| 一区二区三区在线高清| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区三区| 一本色道婷婷久久欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久奇米色影视 | 一区二区久久久久久| 亚洲天堂偷拍| 久久久xxx| 欧美劲爆第一页| 国产精品美女诱惑| 国外成人在线视频| 亚洲毛片视频| 性色av一区二区三区红粉影视| 亚洲国产精品va| 亚洲一区3d动漫同人无遮挡| 久久精品国产亚洲高清剧情介绍| 你懂的视频欧美| 国产精品青草综合久久久久99| 国产在线欧美日韩| 亚洲日本aⅴ片在线观看香蕉| 亚洲一区观看| 亚洲精品亚洲人成人网| 欧美一区二区三区啪啪| 欧美激情精品久久久| 国产美女一区二区| 91久久亚洲| 欧美伊人久久| 一区二区三区四区国产精品| 久久精品一本| 欧美日韩在线一区| 一区二区视频免费完整版观看| 一区二区三区国产在线| 亚洲春色另类小说| 亚洲女性喷水在线观看一区| 嫩草国产精品入口| 国产欧美日韩精品a在线观看| 亚洲精品国产精品久久清纯直播| 性欧美激情精品| 亚洲永久在线| 欧美激情国产高清| 国产主播一区| 亚洲欧美日韩国产综合精品二区| 一区二区欧美精品| 麻豆国产va免费精品高清在线| 国产精品毛片大码女人| 亚洲国产一区二区在线| 欧美中文字幕久久| 亚洲伊人久久综合| 欧美精品亚洲| 1000部国产精品成人观看| 亚洲欧美激情四射在线日| 一区二区国产精品| 欧美高清视频一区二区| 狠狠色狠狠色综合日日五| 亚洲欧美在线磁力| 亚洲视频免费观看| 欧美国产大片| 亚洲大胆人体视频| 亚洲丰满在线| 久久免费国产精品| 国产欧美一区二区三区国产幕精品 | 亚洲男人的天堂在线aⅴ视频| 欧美激情在线| 亚洲国产成人av好男人在线观看| 欧美尤物一区| 欧美中文字幕在线| 国产精品久久久久久久久久免费看 | 女主播福利一区| 黑丝一区二区| 欧美一区二区在线| 性色av一区二区三区红粉影视| 欧美三级乱人伦电影| 91久久精品国产91性色tv| 亚洲国产一区二区三区青草影视| 久久久精品999| 国产亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩一区在线| 欧美亚洲日本国产| 国产精品视频网站| 亚洲一区二区在线免费观看视频 | 亚洲精品色婷婷福利天堂| 老司机精品久久| 激情久久综艺| 亚洲欧洲视频在线| 欧美aaaaaaaa牛牛影院| 在线成人av.com| 亚洲高清视频的网址| 久久综合色8888| 亚洲高清在线观看一区| 亚洲精品一区二区三区婷婷月 | 国产精品超碰97尤物18| 一区二区不卡在线视频 午夜欧美不卡在| 一本色道久久综合狠狠躁篇的优点| 欧美激情二区三区| 亚洲精品国产拍免费91在线| 一区二区三区四区国产精品| 欧美日韩性生活视频| 一区二区av在线| 午夜视黄欧洲亚洲| 国产亚洲综合在线| 亚洲国产精品va在线观看黑人 | 欧美日韩另类综合| 99视频超级精品| 午夜精品成人在线视频| 国产色婷婷国产综合在线理论片a| 欧美一级大片在线免费观看| 久久影音先锋| 亚洲精品美女在线观看| 亚洲一区国产| 国产一区二区三区高清播放| 亚洲国产精品高清久久久| 欧美成人免费视频| 亚洲精选久久| 亚洲欧美激情诱惑| 国内精品免费在线观看| 亚洲精品视频免费在线观看| 欧美视频久久| 欧美在线精品一区| 欧美国产乱视频| 中文久久精品| 久久久久国产精品一区三寸 | 欧美一区二区成人6969| 麻豆免费精品视频| 日韩视频一区二区三区在线播放免费观看 | 国产精品国产a级| 欧美一级二级三级蜜桃| 免费日韩成人| 一级日韩一区在线观看| 久久国产精彩视频| 亚洲激情在线播放| 欧美一区二区高清在线观看| 在线看一区二区| 亚洲欧美在线x视频| 在线成人av网站| 亚洲影视综合| 在线观看欧美一区| 亚洲在线黄色| 精品999成人| 亚洲欧美日韩人成在线播放| 极品日韩av| 亚洲一二三级电影| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合热线| 亚洲——在线| 亚洲福利电影| 欧美专区亚洲专区| 亚洲美女淫视频| 久久综合色一综合色88| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 免费不卡在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩天堂| 欧美日韩国产综合网| 欧美在线日韩| 欧美系列电影免费观看| 91久久午夜| 国产香蕉97碰碰久久人人| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 伊人精品成人久久综合软件| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久亚洲区| 亚洲韩国一区二区三区| 久久米奇亚洲| 亚洲专区在线| 欧美三级视频在线观看|