--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
SPORTS
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates
Hotel Service
China Calendar
Trade & Foreign Investment

Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies

Telecom Competition Crucial
The draft law on telecommunications is set to be submitted for review to the Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council.

While setting principles to ensure the healthy growth of the crucial telecom sector, the draft reportedly keeps a tight rein on the number of new operators entering the market, which risks slowing down the pace of market reform.

The submission will represent the first step towards possible passage of a highly-anticipated law. It would have to go through several departments before being submitted to the National People's Congress for possible approval.

The first step, however, is cause for optimism.

Governing the technically volatile sector, the new draft is yet to encompass all the disputed issues. Even some stipulations of the draft are themselves controversial.

But we cannot wait any longer to see an omnipotent regulation that will satisfy all concerned parties. It is better to resort to revision of the law in the future to get it in tune with changes brought by the sector's constant technological evolution. After all, 24 years have passed since the country started to prepare for such a law.

For a long time the knot of the issue was how to improve the complicated relationships between regulators and upper authorities, regulators and enterprises, consumers and enterprises, and, finally, between the enterprises themselves.

The previous Telecommunications Regulation did not solve this problem.

Promulgated in 2000, the simple administrative regulation no longer meets the needs of the changing situation. The splitting of the former national fixed-line conglomerate China Telecom and the rise of China Tietong, for example, fundamentally reshaped the industrial landscape.

By the end of May the combined number of fixed-line and mobile phone subscribers in China topped 590 million - the world's largest subscriber group.

All this demands a higher level law to better govern the industry.

On the other hand, the fact that the drafting of the law has taken so many years indicates how difficult the task has become.

The thorniest issues are market entry, property rights and interoperatability. They have been the headache of regulators in dealing with previous market disputes and remain the main points of contention in the process of drafting the new telecom law.

Market entry is at the top of the list. Without more operators entering the market to make effective competition possible the market mechanism will not play a leading role in pricing telecom services and the monopoly will continue to prevail.

China currently has only six operators providing basic telecom services, and they are generally single-service providers. Effective competition is yet to make an appearance.

Take mobile service as an example. It is hard to call the market scenario a duopoly, although China Unicom was established in 1994 to compete against the then lone market giant, China Mobile. Today China Unicom's market share in terms of revenues is only around 15 per cent.

The government formerly strictly controlled the number of competitors in the market's initial development stage in order to create a sound environment for the growth of the previously weak State-owned operators. But as the market develops and those operators mature, competition should be encouraged to ensure the market's long-term development.

Thanks to monopoly, China's mobile service fare in the past decade has never been officially adjusted although the subscriber base keeps expanding.

This is unreasonable.

Last year China Mobile reaped 35.6 billion yuan (US$4.29 billion) in net profit, raising its net profit rate to 22 per cent - an exorbitant figure even compared to other domestic monopolistic sectors.

Although some local branches of the mobile operators often broke the limit in the past years, none of them have managed to get the nod from their superiors. This just shows the betrayal of the regulating authorities against the market.

More competitors might help break the pricing iceberg.

Unfortunately, the draft law is reported to maintain strict numerical control over operators of telecom businesses, but the regulators face a dilemma regarding this issue.

If they refuse to open up the sector they may be accused by the market of blocking competition. But if they allow more competition, the unpredictable consequences of competition could bog them down.

Currently the State holds a majority share in all the telecom operators. In the three listed operators - China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom - more than 70 per cent of the shares are non-private.

Once more competitors enter the market and competition intensifies, it will be possible for State operators to incur losses - the political fallout of which would likely be unbearable for the Ministry of Information Industry, the drafter of the telecom law.

The key to this problem remains the task facing many State-owned enterprises: Improving their corporate structure and sharpening their competitive edge.

Without diversifying the property rights structure of telecom operators, regulators will not be encouraged to open up the sector.

Progress in this regard will determine the development track of not only the State operators, but also the reform of the industry as a whole.

The draft law makes much headway in stipulating principles to solve the industrial problems of the telecom sector.

It is expected to strengthen regulations in the telecom market, deal with provisions for universal telecom services, and aid the convergence of telecom, broadcasting and Internet networks.

Above all, principles dealing with the issue of interoperatability have been established. Experts are now looking at the cost of interconnection between different networks.

This is expected to solve the vicious competition among operators blocking connections from other networks.

Despite all this, the capacity of the new law to encourage competition remains the core issue.

It will be the gauge by which to measure the real effectiveness of the law.

(China Daily July 29, 2004)

Telecom Price War Curbs Called into Question
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 91香焦国产线观看看免费| 久久久无码精品午夜| 特级毛片a级毛片免费播放| 国产91中文剧情在线观看| 狠狠色综合色区| 国产精品入口麻豆高清在线| aaaaa级少妇高潮大片| 年轻人影院www你懂的| 国产A√精品区二区三区四区| 激情欧美人xxxxx| 国产精品视频h| 99re热在线观看| 天天爽天天爽夜夜爽毛片| 一级黄色香蕉视频| 我要c死你小荡货高h视频| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文字幕色伊伊| 最近中文字幕mv手机免费高清| 亚洲国产美女精品久久久久| 欧美黑人肉体狂欢大派对| 亚洲黄色性视频| 黄页网站在线观看视频| 国产精品无码日韩欧| 99久久er热在这里只有精品99| 奇米影视77777| 一区二区三区欧美日韩| 成人自拍视频网| 中文字幕理伦午夜福利片| 日本不卡高清中文字幕免费| 久久桃花综合桃花七七网| 日韩欧美在线视频| 么公的又大又深又硬又爽视频| 欧洲一卡2卡3卡4卡免费观看| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线观看 | 亚洲av永久无码精品水牛影视| 欧美巨大bbbb| 亚洲国产成人精品青青草原| 欧美日本一本线在线观看| 亚洲国产视频网| 欧美大片天天免费看视频| 亚洲国产成人精品电影| 欧美中文字幕一区|