www.ccgp-fushun.com
November 13, 2001



War Cost: Nearly US$1Billion a Month

A US helicopter lost in Afghanistan a week ago cost up to twice as much as the government spends yearly on scenic byways. Each cruise missile is worth several American homes.

The total expense of the Afghan war may be nearly as hard to find as people hiding in Afghan caves. By one estimate, the military assault is costing US$500 million to US$1 billion a month - and above the US$1 billion in promised US economic assistance to Pakistan, and debt relief for the country.'

The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a private research group that closely examines the cost of war, offered that monthly figure. Precision is impossible without knowing more about how many bombs are being dropped and what is happening with US forces on the ground, among other variables.

Still, parts of the war are adding up: the estimated US$5,000 an hour to fly a Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber, the US$25,600 cost of one of the frequently used Joint Direct Attack Munition bombs, the top-of-the-line Tomahawk cruise missiles.

As for a running total, "It's very much ballpark," said Steven M. Kosiak, the center's director of budget studies. Some other analysts have projected higher costs.

Stretched over a year, the price of the war could be US$12 billion, half of what the federal government spends on medical research.

By comparison, the bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 cost the United States about US$3 billion.

The 1991 Persian Gulf War cost America an estimated US$61 billion, but all but about US$7 billion was reimbursed by allies. By some accounting methods, the United States may have even made a profit.

Munitions at the disposal of US forces in the Afghan war vary wildly in price.

From the bargain basement: the 500-pound M-117, dropped from a heavy bomber, for a mere US$300 apiece.

At the high end: Tomahawk cruise missiles costing US$600,000 to US$1 million each, many times more than the US$147,100 median price of an American home.

US officials said 50 Tomahawks alone were launched in the opening assault, some from British forces, making an expensive debut. Dependence on cruise missiles has lessened since then.

Pentagon spokeswoman Susan Hansen said it takes time to calculate costs above those normally associated with having forces abroad in peacetime.

"The Department of Defense will be collecting those figures but at this point, a month into the conflict, we don't have them," she said.

On the home front, a study has taken a stab at the costs of the September 11 terrorist attacks and all their fallout - an expense likely to dwarf the costs of the Afghan war.

Peter Navarro, an economist at the University of California in Irvine, calculated US$100 billion in costs so far, nearly half from lost productivity, sales, advertising dollars and airline revenue in the immediate aftermath. That is apart from stock market losses.

Long-term costs are so speculative and dependent on government policy that Navarro did not add them up.

But his calculations do include "terrorist tax" items costing billions to make flying safer. They include US$20 to US$40 an hour for the time each person wastes by going to the airport 90 minutes earlier.

"The stakes here are simply breathtaking," Navarro wrote in the report for the Milken Institute.

To assess the cost of the fighting overseas, budget analysts at least have the experience of past wars to draw from.

Kosiak came to his projection in two ways: one using costs of strike missions over Kosovo and Iraq and applying them to the current conflict, the other by adding up everything known about the Afghan campaign.

Altogether, he calculated that the first 25 days cost US$400 million to US$800 million.

Munitions used on the Taliban include 15,000-pound BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bombs, costing US$27,000 each. The bunker-busting GBU-37 costs US$231,000 apiece, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

America lost a Pave Low helicopter - valued at US$40 million, about double last year's budget for National Scenic Byways projects - in bad weather in Afghanistan, and an US$11 million Black Hawk chopper in Pakistan.

A sampling from private researchers of price tags and estimates concerning the Afghan war and terrorist attacks: War:

-JDAM bomb: US$25,600

-Tomahawk cruise missile: US$600,000-US$1 million

-MK-82 "dumb" bomb: US$600-US$1,400

-BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bomb: US$27,000

-GBU-37 bunker-busting bomb: US$231,000

-Black Hawk helicopter of type lost in Pakistan: US$11 million

-Pave Low helicopter of type lost in Afghanistan: US$40 million

-Hourly cost of flying Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber: US$5,000

-Estimated war cost per month: US$500 million-US$1 billion Attack Aftermath:

-Property damage: US$10-US$13 billion

-Lost economic output: US$47 billion

-Projected airline security: up to US$41 billion

-Economic stimulus package: US$100 billion in legislation passed by Republican-controlled House, US$66.4 billion in Senate plan favored by Democrats.

( China Daily 11/12/2001)

In This Series
References

Archive

Web Link


Copyright © 2001 China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn,infornew@public.bta.net.cn
Tel: 86-10-68996214/15/16

主站蜘蛛池模板: 中国国语毛片免费观看视频| 蜜桃臀av高潮无码| 欧美乱人妖大交xxxx| 欧美人体一区二区三区| 国产无遮挡又黄又爽免费网站| 国产MD视频一区二区三区| 中国内地毛片免费高清| 日韩在线一区视频| 天堂bt资源www在线| 人妻少妇乱子伦无码专区| hdmaturetube熟女xx视频韩国| 波多野结衣绝顶大高潮| 国产又黄又爽又刺激的免费网址 | аⅴ天堂中文在线网| 欧美大BBBBBBBBBBBB| 性色AV无码一区二区三区人妻| 日韩在线视频免费播放| 亚洲欧美日韩网站| 91普通话国产对白在线| 欧美freesex10一13| 国产女人aaa级久久久级| 99爱在线精品视频免费观看9| 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区高清视频| 国产亚洲美女精品久久久| 91麻豆国产免费观看| 扒开两腿中间缝流白浆在线看| 亚洲欧洲另类春色校园小说| 91黑丝国产线观看免费| 高清男的插曲女的欢迎你老狼| 日本妈妈xxxxx| 国产伦一区二区三区免费| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码色欲| 久久九九国产精品怡红院| 精品人妻中文字幕有码在线| 国产精品亚洲综合五月天| 亚洲色婷婷综合久久| 三年片在线观看免费观看大全中国| 美女被羞羞在线观看漫画| 女人zozozo与禽交| 国产亚洲美女精品久久久| 青青草国产精品视频|