www.ccgp-fushun.com
November 13, 2001



War Cost: Nearly US$1Billion a Month

A US helicopter lost in Afghanistan a week ago cost up to twice as much as the government spends yearly on scenic byways. Each cruise missile is worth several American homes.

The total expense of the Afghan war may be nearly as hard to find as people hiding in Afghan caves. By one estimate, the military assault is costing US$500 million to US$1 billion a month - and above the US$1 billion in promised US economic assistance to Pakistan, and debt relief for the country.'

The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a private research group that closely examines the cost of war, offered that monthly figure. Precision is impossible without knowing more about how many bombs are being dropped and what is happening with US forces on the ground, among other variables.

Still, parts of the war are adding up: the estimated US$5,000 an hour to fly a Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber, the US$25,600 cost of one of the frequently used Joint Direct Attack Munition bombs, the top-of-the-line Tomahawk cruise missiles.

As for a running total, "It's very much ballpark," said Steven M. Kosiak, the center's director of budget studies. Some other analysts have projected higher costs.

Stretched over a year, the price of the war could be US$12 billion, half of what the federal government spends on medical research.

By comparison, the bombing campaign against Yugoslavia in 1999 cost the United States about US$3 billion.

The 1991 Persian Gulf War cost America an estimated US$61 billion, but all but about US$7 billion was reimbursed by allies. By some accounting methods, the United States may have even made a profit.

Munitions at the disposal of US forces in the Afghan war vary wildly in price.

From the bargain basement: the 500-pound M-117, dropped from a heavy bomber, for a mere US$300 apiece.

At the high end: Tomahawk cruise missiles costing US$600,000 to US$1 million each, many times more than the US$147,100 median price of an American home.

US officials said 50 Tomahawks alone were launched in the opening assault, some from British forces, making an expensive debut. Dependence on cruise missiles has lessened since then.

Pentagon spokeswoman Susan Hansen said it takes time to calculate costs above those normally associated with having forces abroad in peacetime.

"The Department of Defense will be collecting those figures but at this point, a month into the conflict, we don't have them," she said.

On the home front, a study has taken a stab at the costs of the September 11 terrorist attacks and all their fallout - an expense likely to dwarf the costs of the Afghan war.

Peter Navarro, an economist at the University of California in Irvine, calculated US$100 billion in costs so far, nearly half from lost productivity, sales, advertising dollars and airline revenue in the immediate aftermath. That is apart from stock market losses.

Long-term costs are so speculative and dependent on government policy that Navarro did not add them up.

But his calculations do include "terrorist tax" items costing billions to make flying safer. They include US$20 to US$40 an hour for the time each person wastes by going to the airport 90 minutes earlier.

"The stakes here are simply breathtaking," Navarro wrote in the report for the Milken Institute.

To assess the cost of the fighting overseas, budget analysts at least have the experience of past wars to draw from.

Kosiak came to his projection in two ways: one using costs of strike missions over Kosovo and Iraq and applying them to the current conflict, the other by adding up everything known about the Afghan campaign.

Altogether, he calculated that the first 25 days cost US$400 million to US$800 million.

Munitions used on the Taliban include 15,000-pound BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bombs, costing US$27,000 each. The bunker-busting GBU-37 costs US$231,000 apiece, according to the Federation of American Scientists.

America lost a Pave Low helicopter - valued at US$40 million, about double last year's budget for National Scenic Byways projects - in bad weather in Afghanistan, and an US$11 million Black Hawk chopper in Pakistan.

A sampling from private researchers of price tags and estimates concerning the Afghan war and terrorist attacks: War:

-JDAM bomb: US$25,600

-Tomahawk cruise missile: US$600,000-US$1 million

-MK-82 "dumb" bomb: US$600-US$1,400

-BLU-82 "daisy-cutter" bomb: US$27,000

-GBU-37 bunker-busting bomb: US$231,000

-Black Hawk helicopter of type lost in Pakistan: US$11 million

-Pave Low helicopter of type lost in Afghanistan: US$40 million

-Hourly cost of flying Navy FA-18 fighter-bomber: US$5,000

-Estimated war cost per month: US$500 million-US$1 billion Attack Aftermath:

-Property damage: US$10-US$13 billion

-Lost economic output: US$47 billion

-Projected airline security: up to US$41 billion

-Economic stimulus package: US$100 billion in legislation passed by Republican-controlled House, US$66.4 billion in Senate plan favored by Democrats.

( China Daily 11/12/2001)

In This Series
References

Archive

Web Link


Copyright © 2001 China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn,infornew@public.bta.net.cn
Tel: 86-10-68996214/15/16

主站蜘蛛池模板: 在线播放国产一区二区三区| 最新国产精品精品视频| 四虎精品成人免费观看| 四虎在线最新永久免费| 在线观看国产精美视频| 一二三四社区在线高清观看在线| 无码精品日韩中文字幕| 久久青草国产免费观看| 欧美丰满白嫩bbw激情| 亚洲码在线中文在线观看| 疯狂三人交性欧美| 午夜爽爽爽男女污污污网站| 色欲AV无码一区二区三区| 国产在线精品一区二区不卡麻豆| 伊人一伊人色综合网| 国产超碰人人模人人爽人人喊| a级毛片在线播放| 很黄很污的视频在线观看| 久久18禁高潮出水呻吟娇喘| 日韩午夜小视频| 九九精品国产99精品| 欧美亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲性猛交xx乱| 波多野结衣欲乱上班| 伊甸园在线观看国产| 福利视频999| 全免费a级毛片免费看| 精品视频一区在线观看| 国产91精品系列在线观看| 草莓app下载2019年| 国产亚洲精品美女久久久| 99re最新这里只有精品| 国产欧美日韩精品高清二区综合区| 在线观看精品视频看看播放| 国产综合精品一区二区| 91黑丝国产线观看免费| 国内精品伊人久久久久妇| 99免费在线观看视频| 大象视频在线免费观看| caoporn97在线视频进入| 天天综合网久久|