Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Silk Street Market Loses Appeal in Trademark Case
Adjust font size:

Five major luxury brand names succeeded in safeguarding their trademark rights yesterday in a lawsuit against Beijing-based Silk Street Market.

 

The Beijing High People's Court upheld a previous ruling by the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court last December that backed the claims of Prada, Chanel, Louis Vuitton, Gucci and Burberry.

 

The ruling requires Silk Street Market to pay 20,000 yuan (US$2,500) in compensation to each company for trademark infringement.

 

"We are satisfied with the final judgment, with the exception of the amount of compensation." Wang Yadong, legal counsel for the five brand owners, told China Daily.

 

Initially, each of the five demanded compensation of 500,000 yuan (US$62,000).

 

Wang Zili, a representative for the market, expressed his disappointment at the final ruling, saying it was near impossible for operators to eradicate counterfeiting in such a large market.

 

Huai Xiaofeng, vice president of Beijing High People's Court, said the courts would go to great lengths to crack down on counterfeiters.

 

Each of the five brand owners found counterfeits of their products in the Silk Street Market and presented them as evidence of counterfeiting in a coordinated act in 2005 aimed at protecting their intellectual property rights (IPR).

 

They filed a collective complaint against the market last May calling for the prohibition of counterfeits. But the fakes were still on sale at the market a month later, and the brand owners decided to bring both the market and the individual stores to court.

 

The ruling against the market can be attributed to its inaction to address the concerns of the plaintiffs, according to Zhang Lumin, presiding judge of the IPR tribunal with the Beijing High People's Court.

 

Meanwhile, Louis Vuitton is suing Carrefour's Shanghai joint venture for selling fake handbags.

 

A hearing was held yesterday at Shanghai No 2 Intermediate People's Court, in which the French fashion designer demanded about 600,000 yuan (US$74,000) in compensation from Shanghai Carrefour Lianhua Supermarket Co Ltd.

 

On December 12 last year, a Louis Vuitton employee found three different handbags either with the LV trademark or patterns similar to theirs on sale in the supermarket along downtown Wuning Road.

 

They were being sold for 49.90 yuan (US$6.2) each, while an authentic Louis Vuitton handbag costs about 9,000 yuan (US$1,125).

 

The employee bought one of the bags and two more the next day with local notary officials. He then reported it to the local industry and commerce administration, which confiscated 37 other handbags from the supermarket on December 13.

 

Lin Yi, lawyer for Louis Vuitton, accused the supermarket of deliberately violating the plaintiff's trademark, an act that caused severe damage to the brand and the company's reputation.

 

"The accused company sold the fake products knowing that Louis Vuitton is recognized as one of the top luxury brands in the world," Lin said.

 

Liu Daorong, the lawyer of Shanghai Carrefour Lianhua Supermarket Co Ltd, said only one of the three designs, which had the Louis Vuitton trademark, broke the law. He said there were no similarities between the other two designs and original Louis Vuitton bags.

 

An employee from Shenzhen Runquan Co Ltd, who provides handbags to Carrefour, gave evidence in court.

 

"I had only 60 handbags left when Carrefour ordered 100 at the end of last year," according to Han Chunyue.

 

"I went to a market beside Chenghuang Temple and bought 40 from a street vendor at 20 yuan (US$2.5) each.

 

Han said he had not previously heard of the Louis Vuitton brand.

 

Liu noted that the supermarket was willing to pay compensation to Louis Vuitton, but argued that 600,000 yuan (US$75,000) was too much.

 

No verdict was reached yesterday.

 

(China Daily April 19, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Vuitton Wins Fake Handbag Case in Beijing
Silk Street Market Makes Entrapment Claim
Top Brands Sue Silk Market
'Silk Street' Market Charged for Trademark Infringement
Beijing's Silk Alley to Be Demolished

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 用我的手指来扰乱吧全集在线翻译 | 亚洲av永久综合在线观看尤物| 男女猛烈xx00免费视频试看| 国产av无码久久精品| 99福利在线观看| 榴莲视频app色版| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码蜜桃| 秋霞鲁丝片一区二区三区| 四虎成人精品在永久免费| 青青青青青草原| 国产成人手机高清在线观看网站 | 亚洲精品在线播放视频| 精品久久久久久成人AV| 国99精品无码一区二区三区| 韩国免费一级片| 国产成人小视频| 欧美在线暴力性xxxx| 国产精品免费_区二区三区观看| 91精品视频播放| 在线观看老湿视频福利| reikokobayakawatube| 巨大黑人极品videos精品| 亚洲日韩图片专区第1页| 特级aaaaaaaaa毛片免费视频| 免费看黄a级毛片| 精品国产污污免费网站| 同桌一直在夹腿还嗯啊的叫| 老汉色老汉首页a亚洲| 国产一卡2卡3卡四卡高清| 视频一区在线播放| 国产午夜精品一区理论片| 黑人巨大精品大战白人美女| 在线观看中文字幕| hd日本扒衣党视频播放| 好吊妞视频这里有精品| 一本大道香蕉在线高清视频| 性欧美成人免费观看视| 一级毛片无遮挡免费全部| 最新中文字幕av专区| 亚洲va久久久噜噜噜久久天堂| 欧美丰满熟妇xxxxx|