Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Silk Street Market Loses Appeal in Trademark Case
Adjust font size:

Five major luxury brand names succeeded in safeguarding their trademark rights yesterday in a lawsuit against Beijing-based Silk Street Market.

 

The Beijing High People's Court upheld a previous ruling by the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court last December that backed the claims of Prada, Chanel, Louis Vuitton, Gucci and Burberry.

 

The ruling requires Silk Street Market to pay 20,000 yuan (US$2,500) in compensation to each company for trademark infringement.

 

"We are satisfied with the final judgment, with the exception of the amount of compensation." Wang Yadong, legal counsel for the five brand owners, told China Daily.

 

Initially, each of the five demanded compensation of 500,000 yuan (US$62,000).

 

Wang Zili, a representative for the market, expressed his disappointment at the final ruling, saying it was near impossible for operators to eradicate counterfeiting in such a large market.

 

Huai Xiaofeng, vice president of Beijing High People's Court, said the courts would go to great lengths to crack down on counterfeiters.

 

Each of the five brand owners found counterfeits of their products in the Silk Street Market and presented them as evidence of counterfeiting in a coordinated act in 2005 aimed at protecting their intellectual property rights (IPR).

 

They filed a collective complaint against the market last May calling for the prohibition of counterfeits. But the fakes were still on sale at the market a month later, and the brand owners decided to bring both the market and the individual stores to court.

 

The ruling against the market can be attributed to its inaction to address the concerns of the plaintiffs, according to Zhang Lumin, presiding judge of the IPR tribunal with the Beijing High People's Court.

 

Meanwhile, Louis Vuitton is suing Carrefour's Shanghai joint venture for selling fake handbags.

 

A hearing was held yesterday at Shanghai No 2 Intermediate People's Court, in which the French fashion designer demanded about 600,000 yuan (US$74,000) in compensation from Shanghai Carrefour Lianhua Supermarket Co Ltd.

 

On December 12 last year, a Louis Vuitton employee found three different handbags either with the LV trademark or patterns similar to theirs on sale in the supermarket along downtown Wuning Road.

 

They were being sold for 49.90 yuan (US$6.2) each, while an authentic Louis Vuitton handbag costs about 9,000 yuan (US$1,125).

 

The employee bought one of the bags and two more the next day with local notary officials. He then reported it to the local industry and commerce administration, which confiscated 37 other handbags from the supermarket on December 13.

 

Lin Yi, lawyer for Louis Vuitton, accused the supermarket of deliberately violating the plaintiff's trademark, an act that caused severe damage to the brand and the company's reputation.

 

"The accused company sold the fake products knowing that Louis Vuitton is recognized as one of the top luxury brands in the world," Lin said.

 

Liu Daorong, the lawyer of Shanghai Carrefour Lianhua Supermarket Co Ltd, said only one of the three designs, which had the Louis Vuitton trademark, broke the law. He said there were no similarities between the other two designs and original Louis Vuitton bags.

 

An employee from Shenzhen Runquan Co Ltd, who provides handbags to Carrefour, gave evidence in court.

 

"I had only 60 handbags left when Carrefour ordered 100 at the end of last year," according to Han Chunyue.

 

"I went to a market beside Chenghuang Temple and bought 40 from a street vendor at 20 yuan (US$2.5) each.

 

Han said he had not previously heard of the Louis Vuitton brand.

 

Liu noted that the supermarket was willing to pay compensation to Louis Vuitton, but argued that 600,000 yuan (US$75,000) was too much.

 

No verdict was reached yesterday.

 

(China Daily April 19, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Vuitton Wins Fake Handbag Case in Beijing
Silk Street Market Makes Entrapment Claim
Top Brands Sue Silk Market
'Silk Street' Market Charged for Trademark Infringement
Beijing's Silk Alley to Be Demolished

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號
主站蜘蛛池模板: 男人添女人p免费视频动态图| 67194在线午夜亚洲| 日本三区精品三级在线电影| 亚洲日本中文字幕天天更新| 秋葵app官网免费下载地址| 国产一区二区小早川怜子| 国产三级a三级三级野外| 国产精品美女久久久| av狼最新网址| 少妇饥渴XXHD麻豆XXHD骆驼| 久久一区不卡中文字幕| 日韩欧美国产电影| 亚洲人成网站看在线播放| 欧美精品无需播放器在线观看| 免费**毛片在线播放视| 精品国产自在久久| 四虎国产精品永久地址入口| 菠萝菠萝蜜视频在线| 国产婷婷色综合av蜜臀av| 搡女人免费免费视频观看| 国产美女精品三级在线观看| bt天堂中文资源在线| 嫣嫣是女大生韩漫免费看| 东北少妇不带套对白| 无码专区狠狠躁躁天天躁| 久久国产精品女| 最新国产乱人伦偷精品免费网站| 亚洲免费人成在线视频观看| 欧美日韩精品一区二区在线视频| 任你躁在线精品免费| 精品国产三级a在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线观看免费| 麻豆国产精品一二三在线观看| 国产福利你懂的| 1024手机在线播放视频| 国产麻豆精品原创| GOGOGO免费观看国语| 小小影视日本动漫观看免费| 中文字幕av一区| 日日摸日日碰人妻无码| 久久国产劲暴∨内射新川|