--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies


Blast or Pilot Error Ruled out in China Airlines Crash
Investigators analyzing the crash last month of a China Airlines flight said Tuesday that the flight data and cockpit voice recorders, together with autopsies on the victims and an examination of the wreckage, showed no evidence of an explosion or pilot error.

The findings indicate that something probably went wrong inside the aircraft, a Boeing 747-200, said Kay Yong, the managing director of the Aviation Safety Council, the agency here that is conducting the investigation.

Investigators are paying special attention to whether structural failure or engine problems might have caused the plane to break into four pieces in mid-flight. The crash of the Hong Kong-bound flight into the Taiwan Strait on May 25 killed all 225 people aboard.

Searchers have recovered 162 bodies and 15 percent of the wreckage, including part of the cockpit, and have found no signs of burns or of any explosives or gunshots, Mr. Yong said.

But China Airlines, which is struggling to preserve its commercial viability after nine fatal crashes since 1970, said that it was too soon to rule out "external forces," as opposed to mechanical failure, as a cause of the crash.

Roger Ham, a company spokesman, said that only a small part of Pan Am Flight 103, which was destroyed by a bomb over Lockerbie, Scotland, had been burned. "You have to recover all the wreckage to see what part is attacked or exploded," he said, while declining to comment on what China Airlines thinks caused the crash.

There was also early speculation that the aircraft's fuel tank might have exploded. A fuel tank explosion was implicated in the crash of Trans World Airlines Flight 800, a Boeing 747-131, into the Atlantic Ocean off Long Island shortly after takeoff on July 17, 1996. But Mr. Yong said today that there was no evidence this happened to the China Airlines flight.

On Monday the airline offered to pay $372,000 to each of the families of the people who died. But the offer, made by airline officials to a gathering of more than 300 relatives of crash victims, drew a rancorous reception from some, who said the company should pay $588,000 per victim, or twice what it paid after a fatal crash in 1998, and called for punitive damages.

Some families of crash victims have accused to airline, and to a lesser extent Boeing, of ducking responsibility for the crash. Lee Ham, a crash victim's son, said that China Airlines was to blame for having kept a 23-year-old plane in service too long. The aircraft crashed on its last flight before it was to be sold to a small carrier in Thailand.

Boeing declined to comment on today's statements by investigators. But Ivy Takahashi, a company spokeswoman, said that the plane that crashed had been on 21,398 flights, below the average of 23,000 flights for all Boeing 747-200s in service.

The breakup of China Airlines Flight 611 has drawn international attention because it comes at a time of increasing concern over how long older jets can remain airworthy. Some research has suggested that metal fatigue may be a particular problem in planes that are used regularly in very warm, humid places like Taipei and Hong Kong. But Boeing maintains that with proper maintenance, aircraft aging should not be a problem.

The flight data recorder from Flight 611 shows that the plane began gaining altitude at a significantly faster rate in the 27 seconds before the plane broke apart, although the extra gain in altitude was well within the plane's design limits, Mr. Yong said at a news conference here today. The plane was supposed to be leveling off then as it approached its cruising altitude of 35,000 feet.

No one in the three-member flight crew said anything to indicate an awareness of the extra lift, Mr. Yong said. The autopilot had been engaged earlier in the flight, and there is no evidence that it was turned off before the plane came apart, he added.

Shortly before the breakup, one of the aircraft's four engines began providing slightly less thrust. By coincidence, the same engine is the only one that has been recovered so far from the sea floor.

Phil Tai, the investigator overseeing the recovery of wreckage, said that the engine was intact except for a tiny piece that was missing from the nose cone. Many parts of the engine had been split along the side, apparently when they hit the water after falling more than five miles.

On Sunday, Mr. Yong had separately announced that the cockpit voice recorder had picked up a dozen faint, mysterious sounds in the 13 minutes before the plane came apart. A computer disk with the sounds has been sent to the United States for further analysis, which will take at least a week, Mr. Yong said today.

(China Daily June 26, 2002)

Second Black Box From Airline Crash Recovered
Mainland Offers Radar Data on Taiwan Air Crash
China Airlines Plane Said to Have Broken up in Flight
Mainland Extends Sympathy over Taiwan Air Crash
More Bodies Found from Taiwan Air Crash
No Survivors Found in China Air Crash
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: h视频在线观看免费观看| 一本大道久久东京热无码AV| 91极品在线观看| 嫩BBB槡BBBB槡BBBB| 久久久午夜精品福利内容| 极品艳短篇集500丝袜txt| 亚洲精品成人图区| 第四色播日韩第一页| 国产av无码专区亚洲av麻豆| 高贵的你韩剧免费观看国语版| 国产精品亚洲二区在线播放| 中文无码AV一区二区三区| 日韩欧美在线免费观看| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线秒播| 波多野结衣在线视频观看| 免费看男女做好爽好硬视频| 美女胸又大又黄又www的网站 | 性xxxx视频播放免费| 久久4k岛国高清一区二区| 日韩亚洲av无码一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕在线观看| 欧美性天天影院| 亚洲日韩国产成网在线观看| 波多野结衣伦理电影在线观看| 免费在线看污网站| 精品人妻久久久久久888| 又粗又硬又大又爽免费视频播放| 色多多www视频在线观看免费 | 另类视频区第一页| 色8久久人人97超碰香蕉987| 国产一级二级三级在线观看| 超碰aⅴ人人做人人爽欧美| 国产在线一区二区三区av| 麻豆久久久9性大片| 国产悠悠视频在线播放| 99在线精品视频在线观看| 女性生殖殖器特级表演| wwwxxx国产| 天天综合网网欲色| a级毛片100部免费观看| 天天射天天干天天插|