--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies


Blast or Pilot Error Ruled out in China Airlines Crash
Investigators analyzing the crash last month of a China Airlines flight said Tuesday that the flight data and cockpit voice recorders, together with autopsies on the victims and an examination of the wreckage, showed no evidence of an explosion or pilot error.

The findings indicate that something probably went wrong inside the aircraft, a Boeing 747-200, said Kay Yong, the managing director of the Aviation Safety Council, the agency here that is conducting the investigation.

Investigators are paying special attention to whether structural failure or engine problems might have caused the plane to break into four pieces in mid-flight. The crash of the Hong Kong-bound flight into the Taiwan Strait on May 25 killed all 225 people aboard.

Searchers have recovered 162 bodies and 15 percent of the wreckage, including part of the cockpit, and have found no signs of burns or of any explosives or gunshots, Mr. Yong said.

But China Airlines, which is struggling to preserve its commercial viability after nine fatal crashes since 1970, said that it was too soon to rule out "external forces," as opposed to mechanical failure, as a cause of the crash.

Roger Ham, a company spokesman, said that only a small part of Pan Am Flight 103, which was destroyed by a bomb over Lockerbie, Scotland, had been burned. "You have to recover all the wreckage to see what part is attacked or exploded," he said, while declining to comment on what China Airlines thinks caused the crash.

There was also early speculation that the aircraft's fuel tank might have exploded. A fuel tank explosion was implicated in the crash of Trans World Airlines Flight 800, a Boeing 747-131, into the Atlantic Ocean off Long Island shortly after takeoff on July 17, 1996. But Mr. Yong said today that there was no evidence this happened to the China Airlines flight.

On Monday the airline offered to pay $372,000 to each of the families of the people who died. But the offer, made by airline officials to a gathering of more than 300 relatives of crash victims, drew a rancorous reception from some, who said the company should pay $588,000 per victim, or twice what it paid after a fatal crash in 1998, and called for punitive damages.

Some families of crash victims have accused to airline, and to a lesser extent Boeing, of ducking responsibility for the crash. Lee Ham, a crash victim's son, said that China Airlines was to blame for having kept a 23-year-old plane in service too long. The aircraft crashed on its last flight before it was to be sold to a small carrier in Thailand.

Boeing declined to comment on today's statements by investigators. But Ivy Takahashi, a company spokeswoman, said that the plane that crashed had been on 21,398 flights, below the average of 23,000 flights for all Boeing 747-200s in service.

The breakup of China Airlines Flight 611 has drawn international attention because it comes at a time of increasing concern over how long older jets can remain airworthy. Some research has suggested that metal fatigue may be a particular problem in planes that are used regularly in very warm, humid places like Taipei and Hong Kong. But Boeing maintains that with proper maintenance, aircraft aging should not be a problem.

The flight data recorder from Flight 611 shows that the plane began gaining altitude at a significantly faster rate in the 27 seconds before the plane broke apart, although the extra gain in altitude was well within the plane's design limits, Mr. Yong said at a news conference here today. The plane was supposed to be leveling off then as it approached its cruising altitude of 35,000 feet.

No one in the three-member flight crew said anything to indicate an awareness of the extra lift, Mr. Yong said. The autopilot had been engaged earlier in the flight, and there is no evidence that it was turned off before the plane came apart, he added.

Shortly before the breakup, one of the aircraft's four engines began providing slightly less thrust. By coincidence, the same engine is the only one that has been recovered so far from the sea floor.

Phil Tai, the investigator overseeing the recovery of wreckage, said that the engine was intact except for a tiny piece that was missing from the nose cone. Many parts of the engine had been split along the side, apparently when they hit the water after falling more than five miles.

On Sunday, Mr. Yong had separately announced that the cockpit voice recorder had picked up a dozen faint, mysterious sounds in the 13 minutes before the plane came apart. A computer disk with the sounds has been sent to the United States for further analysis, which will take at least a week, Mr. Yong said today.

(China Daily June 26, 2002)

Second Black Box From Airline Crash Recovered
Mainland Offers Radar Data on Taiwan Air Crash
China Airlines Plane Said to Have Broken up in Flight
Mainland Extends Sympathy over Taiwan Air Crash
More Bodies Found from Taiwan Air Crash
No Survivors Found in China Air Crash
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字日本乱码| 亚洲图片激情小说| 被男按摩师添的好爽在线直播| 国产精品无码素人福利| jyzzjyzz国产免费观看| 成人看的一级毛片| 久久国产亚洲欧美日韩精品| 欧美亚洲国产成人高清在线| 亚洲综合色一区| 精品一区二区三区在线观看| 国产一区二区三区不卡av| 黄页网址大全免费观看12网站| 国产精品亚洲综合五月天| 99久久国产免费-99久久国产免费| 小箩莉奶水四溅小说| 中文字幕成人免费视频| 日韩欧美高清视频| 亚洲av无码精品国产成人| 欧美精品亚洲精品日韩专区| 人妻在线无码一区二区三区| 精品午夜福利在线观看| 四虎网站1515hh四虎免费| 色综合久久久久久久久久 | 久久亚洲精品国产精品黑人| 日韩高清一级毛片| 亚洲a在线播放| 欧美亚洲国产成人高清在线| 亚洲天堂电影网| 欧美日韩精品久久久免费观看| 亚洲综合视频网| 狠狠噜天天噜日日噜视频麻豆| 免费在线观看a级片| 精品国产a∨无码一区二区三区 | 在公车上被一个接一个| JIZZYOU中国少妇| 女人扒开裤子让男人捅| √天堂资源最新版中文种子| 宝贝过来趴好张开腿让我看看| 一级做a爱片在线播放| 免费看片在线观看| 雪花飘在线电影观看韩国|