--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
CULTURE
GOVERNMENT
SCI-TECH
ENVIRONMENT
LIFE
PEOPLE
TRAVEL
WEEKLY REVIEW
Learning Chinese
Learn to Cook Chinese Dishes
Exchange Rates


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies


Blast or Pilot Error Ruled out in China Airlines Crash
Investigators analyzing the crash last month of a China Airlines flight said Tuesday that the flight data and cockpit voice recorders, together with autopsies on the victims and an examination of the wreckage, showed no evidence of an explosion or pilot error.

The findings indicate that something probably went wrong inside the aircraft, a Boeing 747-200, said Kay Yong, the managing director of the Aviation Safety Council, the agency here that is conducting the investigation.

Investigators are paying special attention to whether structural failure or engine problems might have caused the plane to break into four pieces in mid-flight. The crash of the Hong Kong-bound flight into the Taiwan Strait on May 25 killed all 225 people aboard.

Searchers have recovered 162 bodies and 15 percent of the wreckage, including part of the cockpit, and have found no signs of burns or of any explosives or gunshots, Mr. Yong said.

But China Airlines, which is struggling to preserve its commercial viability after nine fatal crashes since 1970, said that it was too soon to rule out "external forces," as opposed to mechanical failure, as a cause of the crash.

Roger Ham, a company spokesman, said that only a small part of Pan Am Flight 103, which was destroyed by a bomb over Lockerbie, Scotland, had been burned. "You have to recover all the wreckage to see what part is attacked or exploded," he said, while declining to comment on what China Airlines thinks caused the crash.

There was also early speculation that the aircraft's fuel tank might have exploded. A fuel tank explosion was implicated in the crash of Trans World Airlines Flight 800, a Boeing 747-131, into the Atlantic Ocean off Long Island shortly after takeoff on July 17, 1996. But Mr. Yong said today that there was no evidence this happened to the China Airlines flight.

On Monday the airline offered to pay $372,000 to each of the families of the people who died. But the offer, made by airline officials to a gathering of more than 300 relatives of crash victims, drew a rancorous reception from some, who said the company should pay $588,000 per victim, or twice what it paid after a fatal crash in 1998, and called for punitive damages.

Some families of crash victims have accused to airline, and to a lesser extent Boeing, of ducking responsibility for the crash. Lee Ham, a crash victim's son, said that China Airlines was to blame for having kept a 23-year-old plane in service too long. The aircraft crashed on its last flight before it was to be sold to a small carrier in Thailand.

Boeing declined to comment on today's statements by investigators. But Ivy Takahashi, a company spokeswoman, said that the plane that crashed had been on 21,398 flights, below the average of 23,000 flights for all Boeing 747-200s in service.

The breakup of China Airlines Flight 611 has drawn international attention because it comes at a time of increasing concern over how long older jets can remain airworthy. Some research has suggested that metal fatigue may be a particular problem in planes that are used regularly in very warm, humid places like Taipei and Hong Kong. But Boeing maintains that with proper maintenance, aircraft aging should not be a problem.

The flight data recorder from Flight 611 shows that the plane began gaining altitude at a significantly faster rate in the 27 seconds before the plane broke apart, although the extra gain in altitude was well within the plane's design limits, Mr. Yong said at a news conference here today. The plane was supposed to be leveling off then as it approached its cruising altitude of 35,000 feet.

No one in the three-member flight crew said anything to indicate an awareness of the extra lift, Mr. Yong said. The autopilot had been engaged earlier in the flight, and there is no evidence that it was turned off before the plane came apart, he added.

Shortly before the breakup, one of the aircraft's four engines began providing slightly less thrust. By coincidence, the same engine is the only one that has been recovered so far from the sea floor.

Phil Tai, the investigator overseeing the recovery of wreckage, said that the engine was intact except for a tiny piece that was missing from the nose cone. Many parts of the engine had been split along the side, apparently when they hit the water after falling more than five miles.

On Sunday, Mr. Yong had separately announced that the cockpit voice recorder had picked up a dozen faint, mysterious sounds in the 13 minutes before the plane came apart. A computer disk with the sounds has been sent to the United States for further analysis, which will take at least a week, Mr. Yong said today.

(China Daily June 26, 2002)

Second Black Box From Airline Crash Recovered
Mainland Offers Radar Data on Taiwan Air Crash
China Airlines Plane Said to Have Broken up in Flight
Mainland Extends Sympathy over Taiwan Air Crash
More Bodies Found from Taiwan Air Crash
No Survivors Found in China Air Crash
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-68326688
主站蜘蛛池模板: 交换美妇94系列部分| 国产乱人伦偷精品视频不卡| h视频免费高清在线观看| 无码欧精品亚洲日韩一区| 乱爱性全过程免费视频| 欧美最猛性xxxxx短视频| 伊人久久久久久久久久| 美女张开腿让男人桶| 国产亚洲精品aa片在线观看网站| 亚洲jizzjizz在线播放久| 国产韩国精品一区二区三区| a级毛片高清免费视频就| 巨r精灵催眠动漫无删减| 中文字幕av高清片| 无码人妻精品中文字幕| 久久婷婷五月国产色综合| 最近中文字幕在线中文高清版| 亚洲国产成人精品女人久久久| 欧美精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品永久www忘忧草| 男人扒开女人下面狂躁动漫版| 免费网站无遮挡| 精品无码人妻夜人多侵犯18| 四虎永久免费观看| 老汉色av影院| 国产97在线观看| 色一情一乱一伦一视频免费看| 国产丰满眼镜女在线观看| 进击的巨人第五季樱花免费版| 国产在线麻豆精品| 黄a大片av永久免费| 国产成人精品日本亚洲专区6| 四虎最新紧急更新地址| 国产精品jizz在线观看老狼| 香蕉伊思人在线精品| 国产精品内射视频免费| 16女性下面无遮挡免费| 国产精品国产三级国快看| 在线免费视频你懂的| 国产精品成人一区二区三区| 2021果冻传媒剧情在线观看|