Court Ruling Favours US Firms in Domain Row

Shao Zongwei

The Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court yesterday ruled in favour of two US companies in separate disputes over the use of domain names.

Beijing-based Guowang Information Corporation (www.cinet.com.cn) was ordered to cancel its domain name www.dupont.com.cn, which it registered with the China Internet Network Information Centre in 1998, because it "violated the exclusive rights" of US firm Dupont, according to the court.

The court also ordered the Beijing Tide Electronic Group (www.tide.com.cn) to stop using its domain name because of a similar problem alleged by company Procter and Gamble.

The two cases are among the recent upsurge in disputes arising from the use of domain names. Sources with the court said such cases are mainly in Beijing and Shanghai. So far, more than 10 cases have been handled in the two cities.

Because of a lack of specific laws relating to such disputes, there have been arguments as to how these cases should be tried, officials said.

The judges in yesterday's two cases used the Trademark Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, contending that both Dupont and Tide are "reputed" trademarks and that registering them as domain names is unfair.

"Reputed trademarks enjoy high business value," said the court. "Even if they are used in unrelated products and services, there may still be misleading and confusing effects for consumers that will negatively affect the original value of the trademarks."

"We do not think that Guowang has violated the Trademark Law," said firm lawyer Shu Ziping. "No clause in the law stipulates that registering trademarks as domain names is a violation of rights. Besides, Guowang and Dupont are not in the same business."

Guowang, a company providing Internet services, has been brought to court by seven international companies over similar allegations. It has already lost three cases.

Shu said yesterday that the company will appeal to a higher court over the latest case.

"Domain names have some features of intellectual property so we judge them using the same regulations," said Luo Dongchuan, judge in the Guowang case. "Also, when we ruled that Guowang had violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, we emphasized the principle of good faith and fair competition."

(China Daily 11/22/2000)


In This Series

New Rules on Telecom and Internet Content

China to Intensify Foreign IPR Protection

References

Archive

Web Link

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品久久久久无码av| 成人h动漫精品一区二区无码| 亚洲理论片中文字幕电影| 美国式禁忌免费看| 国产农村乱子伦精品视频| 亚洲国产最大av| 国产色a在线观看| a视频在线免费观看| 性xxxxx大片免费视频| 久久99精品久久久久久水蜜桃| 春日野结衣女女| 亚洲xxxx18| 欧美在线视频a| 亚洲欧美不卡视频在线播放| 爽爽影院色黄网站在线观看| 刺激videoschina偷拍| 老子影院午夜伦不卡亚洲| 国产午夜免费福利红片| 国产精品www| 国产欧美日本亚洲精品一4区| 2021国产麻豆剧果冻传媒入口| 国精品午夜福利视频不卡麻豆| а天堂中文最新一区二区三区| 成在线人视频免费视频| 久久中文字幕免费视频| 日本精品一区二区三本中文| 亚洲AV综合AV一区二区三区| 欧美一级黄色片视频| 亚洲国产高清在线精品一区 | 中文字幕在线电影| 无码国内精品人妻少妇蜜桃视频| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩按摩| 日本视频免费高清一本18| 久久精品国产99国产精品亚洲| 曰韩无码二三区中文字幕| 五月花精品视频在线观看| 杨幂下面好紧好湿好爽| 亚洲av无码不卡在线播放| 欧美va天堂在线电影| 亚洲一区二区三区在线| 末成年美女黄网站色大片连接|