Court Ruling Favours US Firms in Domain Row

Shao Zongwei

The Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court yesterday ruled in favour of two US companies in separate disputes over the use of domain names.

Beijing-based Guowang Information Corporation (www.cinet.com.cn) was ordered to cancel its domain name www.dupont.com.cn, which it registered with the China Internet Network Information Centre in 1998, because it "violated the exclusive rights" of US firm Dupont, according to the court.

The court also ordered the Beijing Tide Electronic Group (www.tide.com.cn) to stop using its domain name because of a similar problem alleged by company Procter and Gamble.

The two cases are among the recent upsurge in disputes arising from the use of domain names. Sources with the court said such cases are mainly in Beijing and Shanghai. So far, more than 10 cases have been handled in the two cities.

Because of a lack of specific laws relating to such disputes, there have been arguments as to how these cases should be tried, officials said.

The judges in yesterday's two cases used the Trademark Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, contending that both Dupont and Tide are "reputed" trademarks and that registering them as domain names is unfair.

"Reputed trademarks enjoy high business value," said the court. "Even if they are used in unrelated products and services, there may still be misleading and confusing effects for consumers that will negatively affect the original value of the trademarks."

"We do not think that Guowang has violated the Trademark Law," said firm lawyer Shu Ziping. "No clause in the law stipulates that registering trademarks as domain names is a violation of rights. Besides, Guowang and Dupont are not in the same business."

Guowang, a company providing Internet services, has been brought to court by seven international companies over similar allegations. It has already lost three cases.

Shu said yesterday that the company will appeal to a higher court over the latest case.

"Domain names have some features of intellectual property so we judge them using the same regulations," said Luo Dongchuan, judge in the Guowang case. "Also, when we ruled that Guowang had violated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, we emphasized the principle of good faith and fair competition."

(China Daily 11/22/2000)


In This Series

New Rules on Telecom and Internet Content

China to Intensify Foreign IPR Protection

References

Archive

Web Link

主站蜘蛛池模板: 伊人天堂av无码av日韩av| 国产大乳喷奶水在线看| 一个人看的www日本高清视频| 日韩精品一区二区三区在线观看l| 亚洲熟妇无码乱子av电影| 精品三级久久久久电影网1| 国产亚洲一区二区三区在线观看 | 天天摸天天做天天爽水多| 中文字幕影片免费在线观看| 日韩不卡视频在线| 亚洲av无码片一区二区三区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频图片| 亚洲综合伊人制服丝袜美腿| 神尾舞高清无在码在线| 又色又爽又黄的视频毛片| 荡货把腿给我打开视频| 国产国语对白露脸| 成人污视频网站| 国产精品一区二区av| 2022国产成人精品视频人| 国内精品区一区二区三| gay精牛cum| 妖精视频一区二区三区| 不卡精品国产_亚洲人成在线| 无码精品a∨在线观看无广告| 久久午夜无码鲁丝片午夜精品| 最近中文字幕免费完整国语| 亚洲伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美成人免费全部网站| 亚洲欧美日韩久久精品第一区 | 波多野结衣一区在线观看| 人妻影音先锋啪啪av资源| 精品一区二区三区在线视频| 午夜影视在线免费观看| 美女吸乳羞羞漫画| 回复术士的重来人生第一季樱花动漫 | 国产综合精品一区二区三区| 99国产成+人+综合+亚洲欧美| 天天碰免费上传视频| japanese日本护士xxxx18一19 | 欧美性a欧美在线|