Home / China / National News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Capital Cases Made More Transparent
Adjust font size:

Trials that could lead to a death sentence will be subjected to further openness and transparency in a bid to ensure that the legal system is just.

"First-instance hearings of capital punishment cases must be open," said a circular released by the Supreme People's Court yesterday.

"Courts should eventually carry out public trials for appeal hearings in criminal cases," the document said. "They should also hold more public trials for appeals in civil and administrative cases."

For a variety of reasons, some appeal hearings are not open to the public.

For instance, when it is clear that a verdict was reached via an incorrect application of the law, or that the evidence submitted in the first trial was insufficient, then it is usually considered unnecessary to hold a second public trial.

Though the Criminal Procedural Law, Civil Procedural Law and Administrative Procedural Law have laid out the types of cases that can be tried in public, yesterday's circular was the first specialized document on the subject.

It emphasized the need for timely, open trials in "full scale".

A "full-scale" public trial includes an open hearing, open proof-lodging, open cross-examinations and "public announcement of the judgment".

It also requires the public release of any information contributing to the protection of litigants' rights according to trial requirements.

The country's highest court also called for more in-court announcements of judgments, with fewer mandatory sentences and pronouncements on fixed dates.

Legal experts hailed the new regulations, saying they represented an important step toward ensuring justice, curbing corruption and protecting litigants' rights.

"It will ensure fairness and efficiency and also improve judges' capacities because the public will have more chances to hear about and comment on judgments," Yuan Shuhong, vice-president of the China National School of Administration and an expert in administrative law.

In the new regulations, the Supreme People's Court says citizens can always observe trials as long as they bring proof of identity. Courts should "make necessary explanations if the number of observers is limited in some cases".

Courts are also required to establish an information system to give litigants access to information concerning their cases, and higher courts should publish more judgments in publications, local area networks and the Internet.

Courts are also encouraged to record important hearings and establish audio-visual archives, and litigants can apply to review and copy some materials.

Some courts, such as the Xuzhou Intermediate People's Court in Jiangsu Province, have been opening their proceedings to the public.

Since 2003, all appeals in civil trials, except those solved by out-of-court mediation, said Yue Cailing, a senior official with the Xuzhou Intermediate People's Court.

According to data from 2003 to this May, 67.6 percent of the court's civil trial verdicts were handed down in court.

(China Daily June 15, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Court Rules Improve Penalty Application
- China's Judicial System
- Maritime Judicial System Established: Official
- Senior Official Calls for Further Judicial Reform
- China's Judicial Work in 2006
Most Viewed >>
主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人免费在线视频网站| 欧美MV日韩MV国产网站| 四影虎影ww4hu32海外| 黄网站色视频免费观看| 国产精品先锋资源站先锋影院| 9久9久热精品视频在线观看| 性孕妇video国产中国| 久久久噜噜噜久久久午夜| 最近中文字幕视频高清| 亚洲欧美国产一区二区三区| 狠狠色综合7777久夜色撩人| 六月婷婷综合激情| 羞羞视频免费网站入口| 国产三级精品三级在线观看| 高潮内射免费看片| 国产欧美日韩另类精彩视频| 13一14周岁毛片免费| 国产黄a三级三级看三级| 99精品视频在线观看免费| 好男人好资源影视在线4| 三级韩国床戏3小时合集| 成年美女黄网站小视频| 久久99精品久久久久久不卡| 日韩a毛片免费观看| 久久精品国产精品亚洲精品 | 欧美巨大精品videos| 亚洲欧美日韩久久精品| 欧美黑人巨大videos精| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜桃图片 | 小仙女np高h| 三年片在线观看免费观看大全中国| 无码欧精品亚洲日韩一区| 久久久久99精品成人片试看| 日本免费看视频| 久久亚洲精品成人av无码网站| 日韩一本二本三本的区别青| 久久精品国产清白在天天线| 日韩午夜免费视频| 免费观看呢日本天堂视频| 中文字幕a∨在线乱码免费看| 日韩精品一区二区三区中文版|