Public demand greater transparency of charities

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, August 8, 2011
Adjust font size:

Although the Red Cross Society of China (RCSC) has boosted its public disclosures to regain credibility following a trust crisis in June, the public is still blasting the group, as well as other Chinese charities, for a lack of transparency.

The RCSC launched an online information platform on July 31 to provide more transparency following a credibility crisis that resulted from a scandal that allegedly involved the misuse of donations.

The RCSC came under fire following a scandal revolving around a young woman calling herself "Guo Meimei." The woman claimed to be a general manager for "Red Cross Commerce," a group that the RCSC said does not exist.

The woman posted many photos on her microblog detailing her lavish lifestyle, provoking the ire of netizens who speculated that she might have funded her extravagant purchases by embezzling money from the Red Cross Society.

Information regarding donations to areas devastated by last year's 7.1-magnitude earthquake in Yushu was among the first data uploaded to the online platform.

The website has attracted more than 18 million visitors to check out donation information, as well as the RCSC's auditing and fiscal reports.

However, many of these visitors have raised questions and are demanding even greater transparency, as information regarding the use of donations has been described as being too generalized.

Not enough info

Donations by individuals must exceed 100,000 yuan (15,500 U.S.dollars) and those by organizations must exceed 500,000 yuan in order to be disclosed on the website. The public has questioned the high threshold for information disclosure.

In addition, the website only features information on donations made after Jan. 11, 2010; information regarding donations to the Chinese Red Cross Foundation (CRCF) and the RCSC's local branches is not available at all.

A lack of transparency is common for Chinese charity organizations.

The 2011 Annual Report on the Transparency of Chinese Charities, released by the China Charity & Donation Information Center, showed that 75 percent of charities failed to properly disclose information about the use of project funds, operational costs and other information.

Vagueness in vogue

The exact location and use of charity funds are often kept in secrecy by the country's charity groups.

One entry on the RCSC's website showed a 200,000-yuan donation by Hong Kong musician and actor Andy Lau; however, there is no information regarding how his donation was distributed.

On the official website of the China Foundation for Poverty Alleviation (CFPA), information relating to donation usage is either completely missing or is present in the form of vague descriptions such as "quake relief" and "education for orphans."

According to the 2011 Annual Report on the Transparency of Chinese Charities, over 90 percent of respondents said they had never received any feedback from charities after offering donations.

"I donated 2,000 yuan after the Wenchuan earthquake hit, but no one has ever told me where my money went," said Shanghai resident Gao Min.

Wang Zhenyao, dean of the One Foundation Philanthropy Research Institute at Beijing Normal University, said the distribution of donations has to go through bureaucratic red tape, which results in a lack of efficiency and transparency.

What's the cause?

Wang said that most public charities in China are government-sponsored organizations. He said these organizations have neither the motivation nor the pressure to disclose information properly.

Although there are laws and regulations in place that tell charity groups how they should disclose their information, specific guidelines are lacking, he said.

Experts have called for instituting third-party supervision over the operation of the country's charity groups.

Lu Hanlong, vice president of the Chinese Sociological Association, said there should be a supervision system in place that integrates third-party evaluation institutions, the media, donators and the public.

The aforementioned Guo Meimei scandal was far from being the first of its kind. The former vice chairman of the RCSC's Kunming branch was previously accused of using donations for personal use. A cashier working for the RCSC's Wenzhou branch was found embezzling 1.26 billion yuan over the course of five years.

Statistics from the Ministry of Civil Affairs show that the total amount of donations made last year stood around 100 billion yuan

Liu Youping, vice director of the China Charity & Donation Information Center, said transparency is the lifeblood of charities, adding that the public will not fully restore its trust in charity groups until the information they demand is made publicly available.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产裸体歌舞一区二区| 无码精品人妻一区二区三区漫画| 免费中韩高清无专码区2021| 一本大道香蕉大无线视频| 欧美日韩高清完整版在线观看免费 | 97久久精品亚洲中文字幕无码| 日本精品一区二区在线播放| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜桃图片| 精品无码国产一区二区三区51安| 国产精品无码翘臀在线观看| 99精品国产高清一区二区| 小婷的性放荡日记h交| 中文字幕在线免费观看视频| 欧美亚洲国产片在线观看| 亚洲福利在线观看| 猫咪免费人成网站地址| 国产乱来乱子视频| 91在线手机精品免费观看| 成全影视免费观看大全二| 久久久久成人片免费观看蜜芽| 日韩精品一区在线| 亚洲精品无码久久久久YW| 白嫩少妇激情无码| 国产人成无码视频在线观看| 911亚洲精品| 国产日韩一区二区三区在线观看 | 日本三级黄色网址| 亚洲国产精品线观看不卡| 欧美老熟妇欲乱高清视频| 哦太大了太涨了慢一点轻一点| 蜜桃精品免费久久久久影院| 国产精品久久久久久网站| 538在线精品| 国产精品素人福利| 4jzbtv四季彩app下载| 好男人好资源在线观看免费播放高清| 中国大陆高清aⅴ毛片| 成年女人免费碰碰视频| 中文字幕在线看视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲一级片免费看| 欧美一级做一a做片性视频 |