Chinese courts hear the public's voices

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, March 28, 2011
Adjust font size:

As many countries continue to debate the involvement of laypeople in criminal cases, some Chinese courts, eager to pull the judiciary process closer to the public, are creating more room for representatives from the society.

The eastern province of Jiangsu recently became the third Chinese province to hold a criminal trial before a randomly selected "people's jury." The province received public backlash in 2006 after a local court asked a man named Peng Yu to pay the medical bills for an old lady he helped after she fell.

"The Peng Yu Case taught us a lesson about the dangers of distancing our court rulings from public opinion," He Dongjun, senior official of the Intermediate People's Court of Changzhou City in Jiangsu, told local media.

Earlier this month, a court in Changzhou invited a jury of 11 members, including private company employees as well as community and government workers, to hear a trial on drug trafficking and submit their opinions on the conviction and sentencing.

The judges then reviewed the record of the jury's discussion, said Gao Shuqin, the judge presiding over the trial. A revision of the verdict would be considered if the jury's consensus differed from the opinion of the court.

Before Jiangsu, the practice had been tested in criminal courts in the provinces of Henan and Shaanxi as an alternative to the "people's assessors" system.

Chinese courts follow a legal practice that gives professional judges two to four selected "people's assessors" who come from the community and have the same sentencing power as judges.

However, a "people's jury" has up to 13 members and aims to use a cross section of voices from society to influence court rulings.

"Our conclusions were drawn from personal experiences and moral sensibilities, and we told the judges what ordinary people thought of the case," said Li Houdong, a local community worker selected for the jury in the trial in Changzhou.

In Shaanxi, where the jury pilot program started last year, jurors are chosen from a large pool of responsible and public-spirited citizens.

Those schooled in law are ruled out, said Tian Liping, vice president of Shaanxi High People's Court, who insisted the jury stands for ordinary folks.

Guo Xingquan, a legal expert at Shaanxi Academy of Social Sciences, praised the appearance of the jury for increasing public supervision over legal procedures.

"There were some cases in which court rulings had been subject to bribery or personal influence. The problem may be solved by more public engagement," said Guo.

Others, however, have questioned the legitimacy of the novel system and predicted doom for its future application.

"It is against standard judicial procedures and without any backup in the Chinese laws," said Qu Gangde, a lawyer at a Liaoning-based legal firm.

"Furthermore, it's not yet known how much effect the jury can have, since their opinions are non-binding on the final verdict," said Qu.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:    
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久午夜宫电影网| 亚洲精品无码久久毛片| 香港三级电影免费看| 国产精品无码久久四虎| 人人爽人人爽人人爽人人片av| 色综合久久中文字幕综合网| 国产无吗一区二区三区在线欢| 8x成人永久免费视频| 天堂网www天堂在线资源| 两腿之间的私密图片| 日本二本三本二区| 久久精品美女视频| 欧美国产日韩A在线观看| 亚洲电影中文字幕| 玉蒲团2之玉女心经| 免费黄色在线网站| 美国omakmanta| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV琪琪| 99久久国产综合精品麻豆| 宅男666在线永久免费观看| 中文字幕亚洲激情| 日本一道在线观看| 久久国产欧美日韩精品| 日韩黄色片在线观看| 亚洲AV无码专区在线亚| 欧美va天堂在线影院| 亚洲六月丁香婷婷综合| 欧美日韩中文视频| 国模欢欢炮交啪啪150| 一区五十路在线中出| 成年福利片120秒体验区| 久久久久亚洲AV成人无码| 日本精品少妇一区二区三区| 久久精品久久精品久久精品| 日韩精品无码人妻一区二区三区| 亚洲乱码一区av春药高潮| 欧美成人免费全部| 亚洲成AV人片在线播放无码| 欧美日韩在线不卡| 亚洲欧洲日产国产最新| 欧美特黄一免在线观看|