Chinese courts hear the public's voices

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, March 28, 2011
Adjust font size:

As many countries continue to debate the involvement of laypeople in criminal cases, some Chinese courts, eager to pull the judiciary process closer to the public, are creating more room for representatives from the society.

The eastern province of Jiangsu recently became the third Chinese province to hold a criminal trial before a randomly selected "people's jury." The province received public backlash in 2006 after a local court asked a man named Peng Yu to pay the medical bills for an old lady he helped after she fell.

"The Peng Yu Case taught us a lesson about the dangers of distancing our court rulings from public opinion," He Dongjun, senior official of the Intermediate People's Court of Changzhou City in Jiangsu, told local media.

Earlier this month, a court in Changzhou invited a jury of 11 members, including private company employees as well as community and government workers, to hear a trial on drug trafficking and submit their opinions on the conviction and sentencing.

The judges then reviewed the record of the jury's discussion, said Gao Shuqin, the judge presiding over the trial. A revision of the verdict would be considered if the jury's consensus differed from the opinion of the court.

Before Jiangsu, the practice had been tested in criminal courts in the provinces of Henan and Shaanxi as an alternative to the "people's assessors" system.

Chinese courts follow a legal practice that gives professional judges two to four selected "people's assessors" who come from the community and have the same sentencing power as judges.

However, a "people's jury" has up to 13 members and aims to use a cross section of voices from society to influence court rulings.

"Our conclusions were drawn from personal experiences and moral sensibilities, and we told the judges what ordinary people thought of the case," said Li Houdong, a local community worker selected for the jury in the trial in Changzhou.

In Shaanxi, where the jury pilot program started last year, jurors are chosen from a large pool of responsible and public-spirited citizens.

Those schooled in law are ruled out, said Tian Liping, vice president of Shaanxi High People's Court, who insisted the jury stands for ordinary folks.

Guo Xingquan, a legal expert at Shaanxi Academy of Social Sciences, praised the appearance of the jury for increasing public supervision over legal procedures.

"There were some cases in which court rulings had been subject to bribery or personal influence. The problem may be solved by more public engagement," said Guo.

Others, however, have questioned the legitimacy of the novel system and predicted doom for its future application.

"It is against standard judicial procedures and without any backup in the Chinese laws," said Qu Gangde, a lawyer at a Liaoning-based legal firm.

"Furthermore, it's not yet known how much effect the jury can have, since their opinions are non-binding on the final verdict," said Qu.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:    
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久精品2019中文字幕之3| 国产大片91精品免费观看男同| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区在线| 老子影院我不卡在线理论| 在线观看黄色毛片| 亚洲AV无码国产一区二区三区| 美女航空一级毛片在线播放| 国产综合欧美日韩视频一区| 久久av高潮av无码av喷吹| 波多野结衣大片| 国产剧果冻传媒星空在线| caoporn国产精品免费| 日韩小视频网站| 今天免费中文字幕视频| 黄色网站在线观看视频| 天天射天天操天天| 久久精品国产亚洲精品2020| 狂野黑人性猛交xxxxxx| 熟女精品视频一区二区三区| 在线a亚洲视频播放在线观看 | 日本道色综合久久影院| 亚洲男人第一av网站| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频53| 一级毛片视频免费| 波多野结衣久久高清免费| 后入内射欧美99二区视频 | 国产精自产拍久久久久久蜜| 一级爱爱片一级毛片-一毛| 日韩在线视频免费看| 四虎影视在线影院4hutv| 中文天堂最新版在线精品| 天天av天天av天天透| 中文字幕第3页| 最新国产乱人伦偷精品免费网站| 亚洲熟女综合一区二区三区| 精品人妻少妇一区二区| 国产亚洲一区二区在线观看| 亚洲武侠欧美自拍校园| 国精产品一品二品国精品69xx| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合 | 国产精品日韩欧美亚洲另类|