Lawyer sues over plate auctions

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Shanghai Daily, December 30, 2010
Adjust font size:

A Shanghai lawyer is suing the city government in a bid to make officials reveal details of the legal basis for the city's car plate auction system.

The case was heard at Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate People's Court yesterday with two officials from the city's legislative affairs office appearing on behalf of the city government.

Si Weijiang, a lawyer with the DeBund Law Offices, said his intention was to ensure the government performed its duties based on the law.

"The auction system is effective in controlling the number of vehicles," he said after the hearing," Si said.

"I hope to push the local legislative body to make a regulation about the system so that it has a legal basis and that the auction income and how it is spent can be made public," he said.

Shanghai's plate auction system has long been challenged by the public with many saying they don't understand why they must pay tens of thousands of yuan for what is just a piece of metal. Many also want to know what the government does with the huge amount of income the auction system generates.

Si said he asked the municipal government to disclose the legal grounds for the system on June 24.

He received a reply on July 15 saying the system was carried out based on the Road Traffic Safety Law and the Auction Law. The two laws are published on the official website of the National People's Congress, he was told, and the reply advised him to check the website.

Si said it was a perfunctory reply and he couldn't find any legal basis for the system from the two laws. "On the contrary, the two laws just prove the system is illegal," he said.

The traffic safety law doesn't mention the plate quota or an auction system, he said. The Auction Law only regulates auction activity and doesn't clarify that the government can charge plate users via an auction, he added.

He was now asking the government to point to the exact clauses that supported the system.

Song Jian, one of the government officials, told the hearing that the two laws were the legal basis for the system and said Si hadn't asked about clauses in his June 24 application.

"We made the reply following legal procedures. The plaintiff's suit shouldn't be supported by law," he said.

The court didn't announce a verdict.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产亚洲欧美日韩俺去了| jizz18高清视频| 精品视频在线观看你懂的一区| 日本熟妇人妻xxxxx人hd| 免费五级在线观看日本片| jjizz全部免费看片| 新梅瓶1一5集在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人中文在线网站| 色香视频在线观看| 日本亚洲天堂网| 人人妻人人玩人人澡人人爽| 高贵教师被同学调教11| 大伊香蕉精品一区视频在线| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜不卡| 浮力影院国产第一页| 国产区女主播在线观看| 99久久婷婷国产综合精品| 日本免费xxx| 五月天婷婷在线视频国产在线| 理论片中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品毛片完整版视频| 三上悠亚中文字幕在线| 欧美乱xxxxx| 内射中出无码护士在线| 欧美色图一区二区| 天堂网在线观看| 久久中文精品无码中文字幕| 欧美牲交a欧美牲交aⅴ免费下载| 四虎成人国产精品视频| 亚洲天堂水蜜桃| 国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 97久久天天综合色天天综合色| 把女人的嗷嗷嗷叫视频软件| 亚洲乱亚洲乱少妇无码| 男女一边摸一边做爽爽| 国产亚洲精品精品精品| 高清粉嫩无套内谢2020| 国产成人久久精品一区二区三区| 99久久夜色精品国产网站| 夫妇交换性2国语在线观看| 久久99国产综合色|