Husband's 'right to baby' case rejected

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Shanghai Daily, December 21, 2010
Adjust font size:

A husband who sought a divorce because his wife refused to bear him a child and used contraception in secret has had his lawsuit thrown out by a district court.

The Jing'an District People's Court ruled that the so-called "infringement of the husband's right of birth" didn't necessarily mean the couple's marriage had broken up.

The husband, who was identified as Kang, married his wife, identified as Fen, in 2000 when they were nearly 40. Both were marrying for the second time, the court heard.

Fen became pregnant in 2003 and Kang, who has no children, was overjoyed. But Fen wanted an abortion, saying Kang had been suffering from shingles and she feared this could affect the fetus. Kang agreed.

However, Fen did not become pregnant again and in September 2009 Kang learned from her medical record that she had started using a contraceptive ring after the abortion. Enraged, Kang accused Fen of cheating him and depriving him of a child.

In a bid to save their marriage, the couple took part in a popular family dispute TV show presented by Bai Wanqing, a well-known mediator.

Kang told the court that though Fen agreed on the program to bear a child, she refused again afterwards. The husband, now 49, who believes in the Chinese tradition that a man should have a son, sought a divorce.

Fen told the court that she was worried a baby might have learning difficulties as there was a history of genetic problems in Kang's family.

In any case, she had undergone a caesarean section operation when she gave birth to her son - who lives with her ex-husband - and doctors had warned her that giving birth again could prove fatal.

Fen also said when he asked her to marry him, Kang told her they needn't have a child.

The court said the right of birth belongs to both a husband and wife.

It told Kang to be more considerate towards his wife, who at nearly 50 isn't fit for bearing a child.

As Fen won't divorce her husband, the court rejected Kang's lawsuit.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本免费一二区在线电影| 狠狠干最新网址| 最近中文字幕大全高清视频| 国产三级精品三级在专区| 99精品久久久久久久婷婷| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区99| 又色又爽又黄的视频毛片| 538国产视频| 护士们的放荡交换全文| 亚洲欧洲av无码专区| 男人边吃奶边做性视频| 国产欧美久久久精品影院| 91禁漫免费进入| 日本vs黑人hd| 亚洲精品福利视频| 精品一区二区久久久久久久网精| 国产手机精品一区二区| 一a一片一级一片啪啪| 放荡性漫画全文免费| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区电影| 男女免费观看在线爽爽爽视频| 午夜电影一区二区| 自虐不死重口痴女系小说| 国产免费插插插| 91av在线导航| 性欧美暴力猛交xxxxx高清| 久久久久99精品成人片直播| 欧美成人免费一级人片| 亚洲激情在线观看| 美女大黄三级视频在线观看 | 亚洲天堂第一区| 精品人成电影在线观看| 国产成人免费ā片在线观看| 爱看精品福利视频观看| 女人让男人桶的小视频| 久久国产加勒比精品无码| 欧美色视频超清在线观看| 亚洲综合在线视频| 精品国产香蕉伊思人在线又爽又黄 | 可以看的黄色软件| 亚洲成年www|