Anti-trust law treats 'all firms equally'

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, August 13, 2010
Adjust font size:

China has "never discriminated" against foreign companies by using different standards in handling cases of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involving the anti-trust law since its implementation in 2008, said a senior official of the Ministry of Commerce on Thursday.

Since the Chinese government blocked a proposed bid by Coca-Cola for China's top domestic juice maker Huiyuan at a price of $2.5 billion in 2008, there have been concerns that the country is unfairly treating foreign businesses by taking advantage of the anti-monopoly law.

The ministry said that, by the end of June, it had accepted and handled more than 140 M&A cases and approved 95 percent of them "with no strings attached".

"It's unreasonable to conclude that China discriminates or holds any bias against foreign firms by saying that we have banned or set restrictive requirements on some foreign cases," said Shang Ming, director-general of the ministry's anti-monopoly bureau.

The Coca-Cola bid was the only case turned down and five others were approved, although those came with additional restrictive requirements, according to the Ministry of Commerce.

All the six cases involved foreign companies.

He said the reason why China prohibited or set restrictive conditions on certain cases involving foreign firms is that "we found they owned a very high market share, and ... if approved, would exert negative impact on market competition".

The ministry said in April it had also started an anti-monopoly review on a merger proposal between mining giants BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto's iron ore joint venture.

China is the biggest buyer of iron ores. There were concerns that the merger of the two major mining companies would put its domestic steel industry at stake.

Organizations representing foreign companies such as the American Chamber of Commerce in China have said major State-owned companies should also be put under scrutiny in anti-trust approval, because many of them have a monopoly position.

Wu Hongwei, professor of law at Renmin University of China, said the accusations against China are groundless as the law is in line with international principles and are not discriminatory.

"No one can deny the progress China has made in opening its market just because of some complaints or pressures," he said.

The number of M&A applications presented to the ministry for approval will grow by 20 percent from a year earlier, as M&A cases worldwide are expected to pick up this year, Shang said.

The ministry said that, during the past two years, it has found a high ratio of foreign companies among the applicants for M&A approvals.

Under the Chinese anti-monopoly law, companies with annual turnovers of 10 billion yuan ($1.47 billion) globally and 400 million yuan in China, or combined turnovers of $2 billion in China, must get anti-trust approval for a proposed deal from the Chinese government.

Wei Xinghua, professor of economics with Renmin University of China, said that if an M&A deal is based on market rules, no objection should be raised. However, he said many foreign companies tried to monopolize sectors through the acquisition of local companies.

Foreign companies control 21 out of 28 major industries in the country, Wei said. In many industries, the top five players are all foreign ones, he said.

Shang said China will try to improve the anti-trust law by drafting some supplementary rules and regulations, as the law is still quite new in China. But the improvement will be made gradually, Shang said.

The anti-trust law took effect on Aug 1, 2008. A number of multinationals have been complaining about the slow pace and transparency of the evaluation and review process. In the case of Panasonic's takeover of Sanyo, the ministry accepted the filing four months after the company first lodged its file.

But Shang said the complaints "do not really make sense". Under the law, there are three phases in the review.

"Actually, in the review of majority of the cases, more than 60 percent was finished during the first phase and took less than 30 days. The rest took 90 days and even a few lasted 180 days," he said.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲熟妇无码av在线播放| 国产精品视频九九九| 九九热爱视频精品| 特级毛片全部免费播放a一级| 6080午夜乱理伦片| 无人视频在线观看免费播放影院 | 国内外一级毛片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜美腿乱| 日韩中文有码高清| 亚洲人成色在线观看| 黄页网址在线免费观看| 日本免费人成视频播放| 免费看毛片电影| 萝li交小说合集| 国产成人综合久久亚洲精品| 最新jizz欧美| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区9厂 | 亚洲另类无码专区丝袜| 狠狠色综合网站久久久久久久高清| 国产国产人免费人成免费视频| 99热精品国产三级在线观看| 幻女free性俄罗斯第一次摘花| 亚洲人av高清无码| 欧美精品videosex极品| 亚洲综合久久1区2区3区| 男女污污在线观看| 免费观看美女用震蛋喷水的视频 | 青青视频国产在线播放| 国产成人精品A视频一区| 一级毛片在线免费播放| 无人视频在线观看免费播放影院 | 免费一级做a爰片久久毛片潮喷| a毛看片免费观看视频| 日韩高清伦理片中字在线观看| 人妻少妇精品久久久久久| 精品免费人成视频APP| 国产jizz在线观看| 色吊丝最新在线播放网站| 国产在线拍揄自揄拍无码| 久久6这里只有精品| 国产漂亮白嫩美女在线观看|