Anti-trust law treats 'all firms equally'

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, August 13, 2010
Adjust font size:

China has "never discriminated" against foreign companies by using different standards in handling cases of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involving the anti-trust law since its implementation in 2008, said a senior official of the Ministry of Commerce on Thursday.

Since the Chinese government blocked a proposed bid by Coca-Cola for China's top domestic juice maker Huiyuan at a price of $2.5 billion in 2008, there have been concerns that the country is unfairly treating foreign businesses by taking advantage of the anti-monopoly law.

The ministry said that, by the end of June, it had accepted and handled more than 140 M&A cases and approved 95 percent of them "with no strings attached".

"It's unreasonable to conclude that China discriminates or holds any bias against foreign firms by saying that we have banned or set restrictive requirements on some foreign cases," said Shang Ming, director-general of the ministry's anti-monopoly bureau.

The Coca-Cola bid was the only case turned down and five others were approved, although those came with additional restrictive requirements, according to the Ministry of Commerce.

All the six cases involved foreign companies.

He said the reason why China prohibited or set restrictive conditions on certain cases involving foreign firms is that "we found they owned a very high market share, and ... if approved, would exert negative impact on market competition".

The ministry said in April it had also started an anti-monopoly review on a merger proposal between mining giants BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto's iron ore joint venture.

China is the biggest buyer of iron ores. There were concerns that the merger of the two major mining companies would put its domestic steel industry at stake.

Organizations representing foreign companies such as the American Chamber of Commerce in China have said major State-owned companies should also be put under scrutiny in anti-trust approval, because many of them have a monopoly position.

Wu Hongwei, professor of law at Renmin University of China, said the accusations against China are groundless as the law is in line with international principles and are not discriminatory.

"No one can deny the progress China has made in opening its market just because of some complaints or pressures," he said.

The number of M&A applications presented to the ministry for approval will grow by 20 percent from a year earlier, as M&A cases worldwide are expected to pick up this year, Shang said.

The ministry said that, during the past two years, it has found a high ratio of foreign companies among the applicants for M&A approvals.

Under the Chinese anti-monopoly law, companies with annual turnovers of 10 billion yuan ($1.47 billion) globally and 400 million yuan in China, or combined turnovers of $2 billion in China, must get anti-trust approval for a proposed deal from the Chinese government.

Wei Xinghua, professor of economics with Renmin University of China, said that if an M&A deal is based on market rules, no objection should be raised. However, he said many foreign companies tried to monopolize sectors through the acquisition of local companies.

Foreign companies control 21 out of 28 major industries in the country, Wei said. In many industries, the top five players are all foreign ones, he said.

Shang said China will try to improve the anti-trust law by drafting some supplementary rules and regulations, as the law is still quite new in China. But the improvement will be made gradually, Shang said.

The anti-trust law took effect on Aug 1, 2008. A number of multinationals have been complaining about the slow pace and transparency of the evaluation and review process. In the case of Panasonic's takeover of Sanyo, the ministry accepted the filing four months after the company first lodged its file.

But Shang said the complaints "do not really make sense". Under the law, there are three phases in the review.

"Actually, in the review of majority of the cases, more than 60 percent was finished during the first phase and took less than 30 days. The rest took 90 days and even a few lasted 180 days," he said.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 史上最新中文字幕| 曰韩无码无遮挡a级毛片| 国产99久久久久久免费看| 天天摸日日摸人人看| 国内久久精品视频| 久久精品中文字幕| 欧美性xxxx极品高清| 亚洲色国产欧美日韩| 精品久久久久久无码免费| 国产99视频精品免视看7| 青青青国产精品一区二区| 国产精品xxxx国产喷水| 91香蕉国产线观看免| 好吊色青青青国产在线观看| 中文乱码人妻系列一区二区| 欧美成人小视频| 亚洲精品视频在线免费| 男女超级黄aaa大片免费| 午夜影放免费观看| 老司机午夜在线视频免费| 国产乱视频在线观看| 高清国产一级毛片国语| 国产成人精品永久免费视频| xxxxwww免费| 国产精品无码专区AV在线播放| 97无码免费人妻超级碰碰夜夜| 日日摸日日碰人妻无码| 亚洲国产香蕉视频欧美| 绿帽子巨物夺娇妻09| 国产真实伦视频在线观看| 59pao成国产成视频永久免费| 在线观看视频99| a√天堂中文在线最新版| 日朝欧美亚洲精品| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费强| 日韩精品无码免费专区网站| 亚洲综合无码一区二区| 男女搞基视频软件| 免费视频88av在线| 精品一区二区三区自拍图片区| 午夜私人影院免费体验区|