'School-choosing fee' dissatisfies most Chinese people

By Chen Xia
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China.org.cn, November 20, 2009
Adjust font size:

"School-choosing fee" should be abolished

In the survey about who should be responsible for the popularity of choosing schools, 71.5 percent of the respondents chose "local education department;" 68.5 percent chose "national education authority;" 40.3 percent chose "schools;" and 24.8 percent chose "parents."

Ms. Gao, a middle school teacher in suburban Beijing, said the "school-choosing fee" was an important revenue source for her school. Parents usually give the fee to the local education department, which then allocates half of the money to the school. Her school is not among the best ones, but it still attracts a lot of students with its convenient location.

"After the 'school-choosing students' came to our school, our wages increased. Sometimes, though, these students caused problems. Many of them were disobedient and lagged behind others in examinations," said Gao, who wants to choose another school to work at. "Students enrolled in good schools are better students. It's a pleasure to teach them and the wages there are much higher than at ordinary schools."

"Schools' competencies vary greatly in different regions. This has historical reasons, but it is not unchangeable," said Zheng. For instance, in Tongling City of Anhui Province, the local government attaches a great importance to the equal development of schools. By allocating more resources to poorer schools, the city has managed to put a stop to parents choosing schools for their children. According to Zheng, the problem can be solved if the government is resolute to do it.

A teacher at No.6 Middle School in Tongling City said all middle schools in Tongling have similar facilities and wages. The only differences are school scale and admission quotas. No.6 Middle School is not a "model school," but teachers are confident about their students' abilities.

When asked about how to address the issue of parents choosing schools, 68.1 percent of the survey's respondents agreed that the "school-choosing fee" should be completely abolished. About 63.9 percent said a quality-oriented education should be put into practice and people should change the old mentality that entering college means everything in the world. In addition, 57.7 percent of the respondents thought there should be a long-term policy to support and enable headmasters and teachers to move freely among schools, and another 57.7 percent suggested authorities increase funding to poor schools.

According to Cheng Fangping at the China National Institute for Educational Research, the Education Ministry has devised a plan to balance educational resources. Cheng says it is imperative to put the plan into practice. A balanced education system doesn't mean every school should be exactly the same. Outstanding schools must keep their specialties and poor schools should receive more help from the government. "Tackling the phenomenon will hurt the interests of some groups, but we should be courageous, patient and confident in reform," said Cheng.

   Previous   1   2   3   4  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 青青青国产依人在在线观看高| 亚洲欧美电影在线一区二区| 99久久免费观看| 日韩欧美第一页| 人人做人人爽人人爱| 青青青国产精品国产精品美女| 国产精品久久久久久久久| 一本色道久久HEZYO无码| 日本dhxxxxxdh14日本| 亚洲最大视频网站| 综合五月天婷婷丁香| 国产精品一级片| 91福利视频网站| 性色AV一区二区三区无码| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕无码| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠888米奇视频| 可以免费看黄的app| 黄色网站小视频| 国产精品无码DVD在线观看| 一级免费黄色片| 日韩欧美亚洲国产精品字幕久久久 | 插B内射18免费视频| 亚洲国产成人手机在线电影bd| 精品国产www| 国产午夜视频在线观看| 91在线国内在线播放大神| 快猫官方网站是多少| 亚洲国产成人精品女人久久久| 渣男和渣女做不干净事情视频| 全高清特级毛片| 精品无码国产一区二区三区51安 | 久久一本精品久久精品66| 欧美免赞性视频| 免费中韩高清无专码区2021| 青青草91久久国产频道| 国产精品日韩专区| mp1pud麻豆媒体| 无码任你躁久久久久久久| 久久久久亚洲精品无码网址| 日韩一区二区三区精品| 亚洲午夜国产片在线观看|