Home / Business Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
It may be better to let Detroit go bankrupt
Adjust font size:

By Mitt Romney

If General Motors, Ford and Chrysler get the bailout that their chief executives asked for recently, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye. It won't go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed.

Without that bailout, Detroit will need to drastically restructure itself. With it, the automakers will stay the course - the suicidal course of declining market shares, insurmountable labor and retiree burdens, technology atrophy, product inferiority and never-ending job losses. Detroit needs a turnaround, not a check.

I love cars, American cars. I was born in Detroit, the son of an auto chief executive. In 1954, my dad, George Romney, was tapped to run American Motors when its president suddenly died. The company itself was on life support - banks were threatening to deal it a death blow. The stock collapsed. I watched Dad work to turn the company around - and years later at business school, they were still talking about it. From the lessons of that turnaround, and from my own experiences, I have several prescriptions for Detroit's automakers.

First, their huge disadvantage in costs relative to foreign brands must be eliminated. That means new labor agreements to align pay and benefits to match those of workers at competitors like BMW, Honda, Nissan and Toyota. Furthermore, retiree benefits must be reduced so that the total burden per auto for domestic makers is not higher than that of foreign producers.

That extra burden is estimated to be more than $2,000 per car. Think what that means: Ford, for example, needs to cut $2,000 worth of features and quality out of its Taurus to compete with Toyota's Avalon. Of course the Avalon feels like a better product - it has $2,000 more put into it. Considering this disadvantage, Detroit has done a remarkable job of designing and engineering its cars. But if this cost penalty persists, any bailout will only delay the inevitable.

Second, management as is must go. New faces should be recruited from unrelated industries - from companies widely respected for excellence in marketing, innovation, creativity and labor relations.

The new management must work with labor leaders to see that the enmity between labor and management comes to an end. This division is a holdover from the early years of the last century, when unions brought workers job security and better wages and benefits. But as Walter Reuther, the former head of the United Automobile Workers, said to my father, "Getting more and more pay for less and less work is a dead-end street."

You don't have to look far for industries with unions that went down that road. Companies in the 21st century cannot perpetuate the destructive labor relations of the 20th. This will mean a new direction for the UAW, profit sharing or stock grants to all employees and a change in Big Three management culture.

The need for collaboration will mean accepting sanity in salaries and perks. At American Motors, my dad cut his pay and that of his executive team, he bought stock in the company, and he went out to factories to talk to workers directly. Get rid of the planes, the executive dining rooms - all the symbols that breed resentment among the hundreds of thousands who will also be sacrificing to keep the companies afloat.

Investments must be made for the future. No more focus on quarterly earnings or the kind of short-term stock appreciation that means quick riches for executives with options. Manage with an eye on cash flow, balance sheets and long-term appreciation. Invest in truly competitive products and innovative technologies - especially fuel-saving designs - that may not arrive for years. Starving research and development is like eating the seed corn.

Just as important to the future of American carmakers is the sales force. When sales are down, you don't want to lose the only people who can get them to grow. So don't fire the best dealers, and don't crush them with new financial or performance demands they cannot meet.

It is not wrong to ask for government help, but the automakers should come up with a win-win proposition. I believe the federal government should invest substantially more in basic research that will ultimately benefit the automotive industry, along with many others.

I believe Washington should raise energy research spending to $20 billion a year, from the $4 billion that is spent today. The research could be done at universities, at research labs and even through public-private collaboration. The federal government should also rectify the imbedded tax penalties that favor foreign carmakers.

But don't ask Washington to give shareholders and bondholders a free pass - they bet on management and they lost.

The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk.

In a managed bankruptcy, the federal government would propel newly competitive and viable automakers, rather than seal their fate with a bailout check.

The author is the former governor of Massachusetts

(China Daily via The New York Times Syndicate, November 21, 2008)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- GM to invest 1 billion dollars in Brazil
- GM eyes stake rise in Guangxi venture
- Auto sales continue sinking in China, more promotions ahead
- Government considers help for struggling auto industry
- Rescue package not for automakers, Paulson indicates
Most Viewed >>
- Global car giants bet heavily on China
- China ranks No.1 holder of US bonds
- Shanghai Disneyland 'certain' to go ahead
- China to overhaul dairy industry
- New oil pricing measures to be in place in '20 days'
- Output of Major Industrial Products
- Investment by Various Sectors
- Foreign Direct Investment by Country or Region
- National Price Index
- Value of Major Commodity Import
- Money Supply
- Exchange Rate and Foreign Exchange Reserve
- What does the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement cover?
- How to Set up a Foreign Capital Enterprise in China?
- How Does the VAT Works in China?
- How Much RMB or Foreign Currency Can Be Physically Carried Out of or Into China?
- What Is the Electrical Fitting in China?
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品一区二区久久久久久久网站| 国产在线视频你懂的| 怡红院av一区二区三区| 久久无码专区国产精品s| 欧美性xxxxx极品老少| 人人澡人人澡人人看| 精品国产一区二区三区不卡在线 | 欧美性xxxxx极品老少| 亚洲精品视频在线观看你懂的 | 友田真希息与子中文字幕| 菠萝蜜视频入口| 国产又色又爽又黄的| 91视频一区二区三区| 国产特级毛片aaaaaa| 你懂的视频在线| 国产精品第十页| 97在线观看视频| 天天天欲色欲色WWW免费| wc女厕所散尿hd| 好男人好资源在线观看免费播放高清 | 伊人久久大香线蕉综合AV| 精品国产一区二区三区香蕉事| 嗯灬啊灬老师别揉我奶了啊灬嗯| 色噜噜狠狠一区二区三区果冻| 国产伦精品一区二区三区免费下载 | 成人深夜福利视频| 中文字幕无线码免费人妻| 日本24小时在线| 久久久www成人免费精品| 日本特黄在线观看免费| 久久免费观看国产99精品| 日韩一区精品视频一区二区| 久夜色精品国产一区二区三区| 杨晨晨被老师掀裙子露内内| 亚洲乱码一区av春药高潮| 欧美不卡在线视频| 亚洲一区二区影视| 欧洲一区二区三区在线观看 | 李丽珍蜜桃成熟时电影3在线观看| 亚洲一区精品视频在线| 欧美jizz18欧美|