Telecom engineer criticizes Qualcomm for overcharging

By He Shan
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, April 10, 2014
Adjust font size:

Wu Hequan, a top telecoms engineer in China. [By He Shan / China.org.cn]

Top Chinese telecom engineer Wu Hequan has backed up claims of overcharging by U.S. mobile chipmaker Qualcomm, which is facing an anti-monopoly investigation by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), China's regulatory authority.

Wu said Qualcomm charges discriminatory fees for cell-phone chips used in handsets made by Chinese manufacturers in China.

On Feb. 19, the NDRC announced that it was launching an investigation into Qualcomm's possible malpractice after it received complaints accusing the San Diego-based company of overcharging and abusing its market position.

Wu Hequan said Qualcomm charges handset manufacturers differing royalty rates, or patent licensing fees, which usually range from 1 to 6 percent of the wholesale price of a handset. But he added that Qualcomm charges China at the higher end of the range, as high as 5 percent, much higher than South Korea.

"The fee is unreasonable," he said. "The price includes the cost of any ornaments installed on the handset, even including a diamond."

The chipmaker has also come under fire from regulators including in South Korea who fined the company US$252 million for abusing its dominant position producing CDMA chips which are used in handsets made by Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics.

"Due to Qualcomm's market position, Chinese manufacturers have no choice but to accept its excessive loyalty fee to obtain its chips," Wu said.

In fact, the share of the chip price in the cost of each mobile device has continued to decline, but Qualcomm's fee is a big headache for manufacturers who are struggling to cut costs.

"The Chinese market is so big that Qualcomm can't afford to lose out in it," the?engineer said. Its revenues in China rose to US$12.3 billion in 2013 from US$4.7 billion in 2011, or nearly half the company's total revenue.

Wu said up to 30 percent of the company's revenues came from its loyalty fee.

"China respects intellectual property rights, but charging too much for patents is unacceptable," he said.

"Compared to patent-holders Nokia and Ericsson, who charge royalty rates of between 1 percent and 2 percent, Qualcomm charges much more," he said. "In this respect, the NDRC has a reason to probe them."

Despite the fact that NDRC may impose a high fine after the verdict of the investigation is given, the world's largest mobile chipset developer is expected to benefit significantly from China's 4G transition.

Qualcomm is positioned to rake in the vast majority of the licensing fees for the chips that support a handset using both 3G and 4G in China, providing the chipmaker with a fresh source of royalties.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中国speakingathome宾馆学生| 亚洲午夜久久久影院| 色偷偷亚洲第一综合网| 国产成人综合洲欧美在线| 55夜色66夜色国产精品视频| 天天干天天干天天干| 一边摸一边爽一边叫床视频| 无码视频免费一区二三区| 久久精品国产亚洲AV蜜臀色欲| 欧美一级视频精品观看| 亚洲欧美国产精品专区久久 | 国产超碰人人做人人爽av| bl文库双性灌尿| 好吊妞乱淫欧美| 一级做α爱过程免费视频| 手机看片在线精品观看| 久久不见久久见免费影院www日本 久久不见久久见免费影院www日本 | 榴莲视频在线观看污| 亚洲噜噜噜噜噜影院在线播放| 欧美精品stoya在线| 亚洲综合伊人制服丝袜美腿| 狠狠色综合网站久久久久久久 | 美女扒开内裤羞羞网站| 国产SUV精品一区二区883| 西西人体大胆扒开瓣| 国产伦理一区二区| 香港三级韩国三级人妇三| 国产在线高清精品二区| 黄色三级电影免费观看| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区久久| 亚洲乱码国产乱码精品精| 欧美性猛交xxxx乱大交3| 亚洲日本香蕉视频| 欧美激情a∨在线视频播放| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久亚洲区 | 99re热这里有精品首页视频| 在线观看国产一区亚洲bd| 99精品全国免费观看视频| 大伊香蕉精品一区视频在线| 99在线观看视频免费精品9| 在线观看亚洲一区二区|