US nixes ban on iPhone, iPad in blow to Samsung

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, August 5, 2013
Adjust font size:

U.S. trade representative Michael Froman overruled the ban on iPhone 4 and iPad 2 imports. [File photo]

U.S. trade representative Michael Froman overruled the ban on iPhone 4 and iPad 2 imports. [File photo]

President Barack Obama's trade representative has vetoed a ban on imports of some Apple iPads and older iPhones, dealing a setback to rival South Korean electronics company Samsung.

United States Trade Representative Michael Froman on Saturday overruled a June decision by the US International Trade Commission, which had banned imports of the iPhone 4 and some variations of the iPad 2. The commission ruled that the Chinese-made Apple devices violated a patent held by Samsung and couldn't be imported. The ban never went into effect, though, because the Obama administration had 60 days to decide if it would uphold the commission.

Obama is against import bans on the basis of the type of patent at issue in the Samsung case. The White House has recommended that Congress limit the ITC's ability to impose import bans in these cases.

Samsung and Apple are in a global legal battle over smartphones. Apple argues Samsung's Android phones copy vital iPhone features. Samsung is fighting back with its own complaints. In an email, Apple spokeswoman Kristin Huguet said the company applauded the administration "for standing up for innovation".

Samsung said in a statement late on Saturday night that it was disappointed with Froman's ruling, saying the ITC "correctly recognized that Samsung has been negotiating in good faith, and that Apple remains unwilling to take a license".

Froman wrote in a letter to the commission that he has concerns about patent holders getting too much leverage over competitors that use their technology under licenses.

Companies license patented technology to competitors so the devices can communicate as part of an industry standard for cellphones. Under the "standards-essential patent" legal theory prevailing in federal courts, holders of such patents are obligated to license them to all comers on "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory" terms.

US courts have ruled that such patents cannot be the basis for import bans. The ITC follows a different standard than the courts, but the Obama administration wants it to adhere to the same principles.

Froman wrote that he shares the Obama administration's concerns that the holders of standards-essential patents could get "undue leverage" over their competitors.

Last year, a federal court ruled that Samsung owed Apple US$1 billion in damages for infringing on non-essential Apple patents. But the judge refused to impose an import ban on Samsung phones and later struck US$450 million from the verdict, saying the jurors miscalculated. The case is set for a rematch in appeals court.

Samsung is the world's largest maker of smartphones. Analysts estimate it outsold Apple nearly 2 to 1 in the first three months of the year. However, Apple's smartphone business is more profitable.

The iPhone 4 was launched in 2010 and is the oldest iPhone still sold by Apple. Apple launched the iPad 2 in 2011.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 这里只有精品视频在线| 3d动漫精品一区二区三区| 日本熟妇乱人伦XXXX| 亚洲区小说区图片区qvod| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产aⅴ无码专区亚洲av| 黑人又大又硬又粗再深一点| 国产精品v片在线观看不卡| 97久人人做人人妻人人玩精品| 女人喷液抽搐高潮视频| 中文www新版资源在线| 日本道精品一区二区三区| 亚洲AV午夜成人片| 欧美怡红院免费全部视频| 亚洲精品tv久久久久久久久久| 男高中生大粗吊gvlive| 午夜爽爽爽男女污污污网站| 色婷婷亚洲一区二区三区| 国产公开免费人成视频| 黑人一级黄色片| 国产模特众筹精品视频| 视频一区精品自拍| 国精品无码一区二区三区在线蜜臀 | 国产乱子精品免费视观看片| 国产成人精品一区二区秒拍| 国产精品久久久久影院嫩草 | 2018在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av中文| 91综合精品网站久久| 国内精品伊人久久久久影院对白| 99热精品久久只有精品| 天堂草原电视剧在线观看免费| zooslook欧美另类最新| 张瑶赵敏大学丝袜1-10| 一级片一级毛片| 快穿之性色无边(高h)| 一级片免费试看| 性调教室高h学校小说| 中文字幕乱伦视频| 恸哭の女教师大桥未久| 丁香九月月小说图片区|