Overcapacity troubles Chinese economy, reform needed

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, April 14, 2013
Adjust font size:

Although economic figures for March indicated a more stable economy in China, overcapacity continues to trouble the country's industries.

China's purchasing managers' index (PMI) for the manufacturing sector rose to 50.9 percent in March, representing positive growth, according to data released by the Federation of Logistics and Purchasing (CFLP) on Monday.

However, the sub-index for finished product inventories went over 50 after declining for eight consecutive months, indicating a worsening situation of excess production capacity.

A PMI reading of 50 or greater indicates expansion, while a reading below 50 indicates contraction.

Authorities said China has to cope with overcapacity in traditional manufacturing and emerging industries in the coming years. Otherwise, bankruptcy, debt and unemployment may cause a financial crisis.

"Overcapacity has exposed structural weaknesses in the process of China's industrialization," said Li Yan, director of industrial policy research with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT).

Easing the problem in the short-term by prohibiting excess production and overlapping investment will only ease the symptoms, but not cure the disease.

"Administrative regulations cultivate excess capacity," said Feng Fei, head of industrial economic research at the Development Research Center of the State Council, or China's cabinet.

He said that governments at all levels should recognize administrative influence on resources and production and the blind pursuit of economic growth, which largely determines how local officials are promoted.

IMMODERATE EXCESS

China's latest large-scale governance of overcapacity happened after the world financial crisis in 2008, which was followed by a slack economic recovery and a new round of investment plans.

According to MIIT data, output totaling 720 million tonnes resulted in a loss of 28.92 billion yuan (4.67 billion U.S. dollars) for the country's iron and steel industry in 2012.

This was not a special case. In 2012, 93 percent of electrolytic aluminum enterprises suffered losses, considering the gap of 7 million tonnes between the industry's real output and capacity, MIIT said.

MIIT Minister Miao Wei regarded "moderate excess" as tolerable in economic growth, but warned of inappropriate overcapacity in some industries.

Feng pointed out that the phenomenon is becoming widespread.

Zhang Ping, former head of the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) , China's top economic planner, said the overcapacity problem is especially serious in traditional sectors like steel, cement, electrolytic aluminum, sheet glass and hard coke.

A capacity utilization of less than 70 percent is dangerous and could trigger vicious competition, Miao alerted.

A safe capacity utilization rate falls between 80 and 85 percent. Some industries in China have maintained a rate of just 70 to 75 percent.

China's struggling photovoltaic (PV) industry has had a capacity utilization rate of less than 60 percent.

After suffering from slumping demand and declining polysilicon prices, orders for Chinese PV equipment slumped 80 percent year on year in 2012, according to the China PV Industry Alliance.

Up to 90 percent of Chinese polysilicon makers halted production and 80 percent of solar panel producers shut down or sharply reduced output, the alliance said.

The situation became even worse following EU anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations targeting China's PV market.

Feng said the excess capacity problem cannot be solved by economic expansion, a fact that will make it more complicated to solve the problem.

ADMINISTRATIVE TOOLS

Li Yan attributed the overcapacity to declining demand, excessive investment and low-tech expansion.

"The problem is now rooted in challenges involving time, management and technology," he explained.

Li agreed with Feng in saying that local government performance-oriented investment is another cause of rebounding overcapacity.

Local governments are deeply involved in managing production, which can affect market operation.

"Government power causes similar choices to be made in different places," Feng said. "Vastly profitable sectors like land and mineral resources have led local governments to steer corporate investment."

Local governments are also in charge of approving projects, leading investors to prefer government-targeted sectors so as to ensure approval, Feng said.

Despite central government urges to curb excess capacity, local governments have not taken all the factors involved in industrial layout into consideration. Boosting the local GDP and employment are still prioritized, leading to repeated input for the same projects.

Regional protectionism and lagging systematic reform have sheltered many incompetent companies, hampering the market's function, analysts said.

STRUCTURAL REFORM

The overcapacity problem may be solved through structural reform that boosts innovation and quality-oriented economic growth.

Li said the way local government performance is evaluated should be changed to fit the market and facilitate fair competition, as well as reduce administrative meddling.

Local governments should be banned from using direct stimulative measures to encourage investment, he said.

He also called for more transparent and stricter approval for land projects, leaving decision and risk for enterprisess to cope with.

Financial and taxation reform needs further implementation, in order to act as an efficient tool to restrain local investment while reducing pressure on the expenditures of local governments.

Necessary taxes for resources are expected to cover more products and sectors with high energy consumption, Li said.

Governments at all levels should create a healthy environment that allows the market to maintain itself and weed out unsustainable capacity, he said.

Li said less-controlled market operation and stricter approval for key projects can contribute to realizing greater market competition.

"More open market access, a stricter bankruptcy system and a smoother market pricing mechanism can help give full play to market competition," Feng added.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产免费人成在线视频| 欧美综合色另类图片区| 国产成人av在线免播放观看 | 没带罩子让他玩儿了一天| 国产成人a人亚洲精品无码| 2021麻豆剧果冻传媒影视| 成品人视频ww入口| 久久国产精久久精产国| 污视频网站免费在线观看| 全彩本子里番调教仆人| 免费黄网站大全| 国产精品视频2020| 中文字幕人妻三级中文无码视频| 欧美日韩国产码高清综合人成| 国产AV成人一区二区三区| 窝窝影院午夜看片| 好男人社区神马www在线影视 | 男女啪啪漫画无遮挡全彩| 国产午夜精品一二区理论影院| 99re在线视频播放| 天天av天天av天天透| 久久久久久亚洲精品无码| 日韩精品在线一区二区| 亚洲精品成人a在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品播放| 国产精品v片在线观看不卡| yellow免费网站| 日韩一级片免费| 亚洲AV永久无码精品漫画| 激情五月综合网| 国产97人人超碰caoprom| 青青视频国产在线播放| 国产精品福利自产拍在线观看| 一级一级一片免费高清| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区综合部| 亚洲乱码一二三四五六区| 狠狠躁夜夜躁av网站中文字幕| 国产一区二区三精品久久久无广告 | 人善交video欧美| 玩弄放荡人妻少妇系列视频| 免费a级在线观看完整片|