Home / Business / Technology & Telecom Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
On Governing Un-illegal but Harmful Online Information
Adjust font size:

Laws govern Internet regulations in South Korea. Relevant departments in South Korea ensure Internet safety by listing indecent Internet sites and installing unsuited Internet content filtering software. For example, the Identification Criteria for Indecent Internet Sites was promulgated in April 2001, and the Internet Content Filtering Ordinance was introduced in July 2001.

In 2000, the U.S. Congress passed the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), which requests the operator of commercial web sites should first use electronic age verification systems to differentiate the user's age before allowing him/her to browse contents that defile the mind of the minors. First time violators will face the maximum six-month imprisonment and a U.S.$50,000 fine. The Act also prescribes that, to protect minors from exposure to harmful content, all elementary and secondary schools and libraries that receive the subsidy of federal E-rate Program should set up a filter system to access the Internet. However, it was taken to the court for violation of the constitution, and entered queue of prolonged judicial proceedings.

On June 23, 2003, the Supreme Court of the United States decided after a vote to allow the Congress to require public libraries nationwide to install filtering system of pornographic content, otherwise those libraries cannot acquire government-furnished technical subsidies.

The word "regulation" literally means "a principle, rule, or law designed to control or govern conduct," which indicates government's direct interference in the marketing activities of enterprises. It usually has the following implications: 1) regulation is led by the government; 2) regulation needs legislation to provide a legal basis; 3) during the regulatory process, enterprises and individuals are being controlled, but they can lodge a lawsuit against governmental regulatory actions according to common law and administrative law. This shows that Internet regulations are a series of policies and laws constituted by the government to intervene unlawful practice on the Internet.

The word "governance" is widely used in a business, nonprofits, public administration and international cooperation context. As a concept with broader meanings than "governmental regulation," it generally refers to the collaborative governance by both society and the government, emphasizing the vital function of the market, intermediary organization and individual in social management. Consequently, "governance" can be comprehended in this way: the government, enterprises and individuals are all the subject of governance, with the three parties working together to formulate rules and procedures to coordinate and implement policy and to settle disputes.

The greatest difference between "regulation" and "governance" is their different subject taking the action. "Regulation" stresses the leading role of the government, but not exclude the function of enterprises and individuals, while "governance" is apt to be the collaborative operation of the government, enterprises and individuals. Apparently, to control the un-illegal but harmful Internet information, governance is more scientific and effective than regulation.

From the above analyses, I have the following suggestions from the perspective of governance: First, to further define the criterion of "inappropriate information" according to the law. Second, to actively carry out the Internet content rating system, taking into consideration the demands of different users and supplement it with corresponding filters. Third, to attach equal importance to education and self-discipline, improve citizens' media literacy and establish a proper public opinion environment combining guidance and criticism. Last but not least, we shall gradually improve and perfect our socialist democratic system. In administrating the online content that is of public interest, we shall consider both the validity of the intention and the effectiveness of the result, and both the legitimacy and rationality of the procedure.

Thank you!

Speech delivered by Xiong Chengyu, Professor of Tsinghua University at U.K. – China Internet Roundtable on 22 July 2009, Beijing

(China.org.cn July 22, 2009)

     1   2  


Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read Bookmark and Share
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Chinese gov't won't allow illegal info online
- Unified standard urged to filter unhealthy Internet information
- Interactive Features of the Internet-based Information Platform
- China's Internet security faces new challenge
June 7 Tokyo 2nd China-Japan High-Level Economic Dialogu

June 30 Shanghai 2009 Automotive Engine Technology Seminar

September 8-12 Xiamen China Int'l Fair for Investment and Trade
- Output of Major Industrial Products
- Investment by Various Sectors
- Foreign Direct Investment by Country or Region
- National Price Index
- Value of Major Commodity Import
- Money Supply
- Exchange Rate and Foreign Exchange Reserve
- What does the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement cover?
- How to Set up a Foreign Capital Enterprise in China?
- How Does the VAT Works in China?
- How Much RMB or Foreign Currency Can Be Physically Carried Out of or Into China?
- What Is the Electrical Fitting in China?
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品9999久久久久仙踪林 | 亚洲午夜国产精品无码| 伊人大杳焦在线| 亚洲人成网站999久久久综合 | 女人18片免费视频网站| 国产欧美日产中文| 免费观看黄a一级视频日本| 亚洲乱码一区av春药高潮| 中国女人内谢69xxx视频| 福利视频757| 精品国产欧美sv在线观看| 欧美综合自拍亚洲综合图| 日韩精品欧美高清区| 奇米777视频国产| 国产人妖在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩在线一区| 丰满少妇大力进入| 182在线播放| 精品人妻久久久久久888| 最新版天堂中文在线| 大伊香蕉在线精品不卡视频| 国产交换配乱婬视频| 亚洲日产韩国一二三四区| 中文字幕在线欧美| sss欧美华人整片在线观看| 玖玖在线免费视频| 扒丝袜永久网址pisiwa| 国产欧美日韩精品第一区| 人与禽交另类网站视频| 中文字幕成人精品久久不卡| 日韩精品一区二区三区中文精品| 狼色视频在线观免费观看| 日本理论片www视频| 国产精品无码一本二本三本色| 免费看特级淫片日本| 丰满亚洲大尺度无码无码专线| 亚洲娇小性xxxx色| 特级毛片a级毛片免费播放| 成人黄色电影在线观看 | 两根黑人粗大噗嗤噗嗤视频| 香港三级韩国三级人妇三|