Home / News Type Content Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Silk Street Market Loses Appeal in Trademark Case
Adjust font size:

Five major luxury brand names succeeded in safeguarding their trademark rights yesterday in a lawsuit against Beijing-based Silk Street Market.

 

The Beijing High People's Court upheld a previous ruling by the Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court last December that backed the claims of Prada, Chanel, Louis Vuitton, Gucci and Burberry.

 

The ruling requires Silk Street Market to pay 20,000 yuan (US$2,500) in compensation to each company for trademark infringement.

 

"We are satisfied with the final judgment, with the exception of the amount of compensation." Wang Yadong, legal counsel for the five brand owners, told China Daily.

 

Initially, each of the five demanded compensation of 500,000 yuan (US$62,000).

 

Wang Zili, a representative for the market, expressed his disappointment at the final ruling, saying it was near impossible for operators to eradicate counterfeiting in such a large market.

 

Huai Xiaofeng, vice president of Beijing High People's Court, said the courts would go to great lengths to crack down on counterfeiters.

 

Each of the five brand owners found counterfeits of their products in the Silk Street Market and presented them as evidence of counterfeiting in a coordinated act in 2005 aimed at protecting their intellectual property rights (IPR).

 

They filed a collective complaint against the market last May calling for the prohibition of counterfeits. But the fakes were still on sale at the market a month later, and the brand owners decided to bring both the market and the individual stores to court.

 

The ruling against the market can be attributed to its inaction to address the concerns of the plaintiffs, according to Zhang Lumin, presiding judge of the IPR tribunal with the Beijing High People's Court.

 

Meanwhile, Louis Vuitton is suing Carrefour's Shanghai joint venture for selling fake handbags.

 

A hearing was held yesterday at Shanghai No 2 Intermediate People's Court, in which the French fashion designer demanded about 600,000 yuan (US$74,000) in compensation from Shanghai Carrefour Lianhua Supermarket Co Ltd.

 

On December 12 last year, a Louis Vuitton employee found three different handbags either with the LV trademark or patterns similar to theirs on sale in the supermarket along downtown Wuning Road.

 

They were being sold for 49.90 yuan (US$6.2) each, while an authentic Louis Vuitton handbag costs about 9,000 yuan (US$1,125).

 

The employee bought one of the bags and two more the next day with local notary officials. He then reported it to the local industry and commerce administration, which confiscated 37 other handbags from the supermarket on December 13.

 

Lin Yi, lawyer for Louis Vuitton, accused the supermarket of deliberately violating the plaintiff's trademark, an act that caused severe damage to the brand and the company's reputation.

 

"The accused company sold the fake products knowing that Louis Vuitton is recognized as one of the top luxury brands in the world," Lin said.

 

Liu Daorong, the lawyer of Shanghai Carrefour Lianhua Supermarket Co Ltd, said only one of the three designs, which had the Louis Vuitton trademark, broke the law. He said there were no similarities between the other two designs and original Louis Vuitton bags.

 

An employee from Shenzhen Runquan Co Ltd, who provides handbags to Carrefour, gave evidence in court.

 

"I had only 60 handbags left when Carrefour ordered 100 at the end of last year," according to Han Chunyue.

 

"I went to a market beside Chenghuang Temple and bought 40 from a street vendor at 20 yuan (US$2.5) each.

 

Han said he had not previously heard of the Louis Vuitton brand.

 

Liu noted that the supermarket was willing to pay compensation to Louis Vuitton, but argued that 600,000 yuan (US$75,000) was too much.

 

No verdict was reached yesterday.

 

(China Daily April 19, 2006)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Beijing's Silk Alley to Be Demolished
- 'Silk Street' Market Charged for Trademark Infringement
- Top Brands Sue Silk Market
- Silk Street Market Makes Entrapment Claim
- Vuitton Wins Fake Handbag Case in Beijing
Most Viewed >>
- World's longest sea-spanning bridge to open
- Yao out for season with stress fracture in left foot
- 141 seriously polluting products blacklisted
- China starts excavation for world's first 3G nuclear plant
- Irresponsible remarks on Hu Jia case opposed 
- 'The China Riddle'
- China, US agree to step up constructive,cooperative relations
- FIT World Congress: translators on track
- Christianity popular in Tang Dynasty
- Factory fire kills 15, injures 3 in Shenzhen

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 女人张开腿让男人桶视频| 香蕉视频在线观看黄| 成人观看天堂在线影片| 亚洲AV无一区二区三区久久| 老熟女五十路乱子交尾中出一区| 国产浮力影院第一页| 一级毛片免费播放男男| 欧美一级片在线观看| 免费观看女人与狥交视频在线| 裸のアゲハいきり立つ欲望电影| 国产猛烈高潮尖叫视频免费| 59pao成国产成视频永久免费| 无码高潮少妇毛多水多水免费| 亚洲va国产va天堂va久久| 精品国产一区二区三区久久影院 | 久久综合九色综合欧美就去吻| 精品视频国产狼人视频| 国产偷窥熟女精品视频| 韩国一区二区视频| 国产精品国产三级国产普通话| 三级黄色毛片视频| 欧美成人午夜精品免费福利| 亚洲色大成网站WWW永久网站| 色综合五月婷婷| 国产成人av在线免播放观看| 97精品在线播放| 奇米影视777me| 一区二区三区国模大胆| 成人免费无遮挡无码黄漫视频| 中文字幕无码精品三级在线电影 | 国产福利在线导航| 国产精品538一区二区在线| 2019日韩中文字幕MV| 国产调教在线观看| 91粉色视频在线导航| 国内精品久久久久影院一蜜桃| 久久6这里只有精品| 日本猛少妇色xxxxx猛交| 久久精品国产亚洲7777| 日韩精品一区二区亚洲av观看| 亚欧色一区w666天堂|