Home / News Type Content Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Farmers Say They Were Not Well-informed About Gene Probe
Adjust font size:
Chu Mianzhai, a farmer from Toutuo Town in Yuexi County, Anhui Province, disclosed in a letter that genetic studies conducted by Harvard University did not conform to standard ethics codes.

The genetic studies, using blood collected from many farmers in China, aroused grave concern from the public after media exposure early last year.

Some people point out that science, while important to the advancement of people and health, is not an autonomous entity independent from society. Scientific research must respect human dignity.

In fact, the United States, Australia and India have enacted laws requiring doctors and researchers to inform individuals of their treatment or research.

In his letter to me dated December 31, 2001, Chu recalled how he signed the so-called "informed consent form" that some investigators have claimed he signed in October 1997.

"At the time the Toutuo Hospital issued a document paper, on which were some tiny characters," he wrote. "What these words meant were not discernible to me (as I did not bring my reading glasses with me). Nor did they (referring to the people from the hospital) tell me what it was for. I was just asked to sign it. Perhaps it was the "informed consent form."

Chu, 61, and his wife and two daughters gave blood twice to the Harvard genetic study, without knowing which specific projects they were participating in. In my interview with him at his home a year ago, Chu said he first gave blood in November 1996. He and his family members were asked to give blood again in March 1997, but "there were not as many villagers the first time," he said.

Some villagers declined to go the second time, he recalled, "but I was willing to do it because I wished to get some medical treatment for my daughters, especially the eldest one. She wheezes rather severely in spring time."

But he said the expected treatment never came.

Toutuo was one of the sites for the Harvard genetic study of asthma between 1994 and 1998, with Dr Xu Xiping of Harvard School of Public Health as the principal investigator. But Chu Mianzhai said he had no idea about it, let alone that the project was funded by the National Institute of Health of the United States (NIH).

The media's coverage of the issue, Chu wrote in his letter, "is out of responsibility for the collaboration project on genetic studies as well as for the ordinary Chinese people and the Chinese nation."

A sample "informed consent form" offered to me last January by a local doctor who was involved in the blood collection for the Harvard projects, indicates that the blood taken is part of a genetic study co-sponsored by Harvard University and some Chinese medical institutions.

In the fiscal year of 2000, Xu Xiping headed nine projects funded with NIH grants amounting to nearly US$4.2 million. All of these projects involved blood collection in poor areas in Anhui. Xu claimed in earlier media interviews that his projects would involve screening 200,000 Chinese. Some American physicians were impressed that so many people could be screened at such a low cost.

By contrast, the number of collaborative projects approved by the Chinese government up to January 2001 was only three, which did not include the asthma project.

Amidst the controversy over the bioethics of Harvard projects in Anhui, the Washington Post ran a report last June, saying two Chinese officials told the US Embassy in Beijing that the Chinese probes showed up no evidence against the projects.

However, Wang Yu, deputy director of the State Administration of Human Genetic Resources, said in a conference on August 8, 2001 that no official from the administration was authorized to meet US Embassy officials in Beijing and no official was authorized to make that statement.

Even the Chinese authorities' investigation on the Harvard projects in Anhui, first conducted in late March of 2001, "have yet to reach any official conclusion," he said.

Medical people and journalists in China are continuing to investigate the case, to make sure that Chinese people's rights and bioethical principles were not violated in cross-border genetic research.

The author, Xiong Lei, is a senior journalist with China Features, Xinhua News Agency.

(China Daily January 10, 2002)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
- World's longest sea-spanning bridge to open
- Yao out for season with stress fracture in left foot
- 141 seriously polluting products blacklisted
- China starts excavation for world's first 3G nuclear plant
- 'The China Riddle'
- Irresponsible remarks on Hu Jia case opposed 
- China, US agree to step up constructive,cooperative relations
- 3 dead in south China school killing
- Factory fire kills 15, injures 3 in Shenzhen
- McDonald's turns to feng shui

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产激情电影综合在线看| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩按摩| ass日本大乳pics| 欧美乱色理伦片| 国产精品成人无码视频| 久久久久成人精品免费播放动漫| 激情综合婷婷色五月蜜桃| 国产区精品视频| JAPANESE在线播放国产| tom39你们会回来感谢我的| 精品国产午夜福利在线观看| 国产精品va在线观看无码| 一级毛片一级毛片一级毛片 | 国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍| 久久免费国产视频| 毛片网站免费观看| 四虎国产在线观看| caoporn地址| 天堂一区二区三区精品| 亚洲乱码一区二区三区在线观看| 精品熟女少妇av免费久久| 国产欧美日韩精品高清二区综合区| taoju.tv| 小仙女app2021版最新| 久久婷婷五月综合尤物色国产| 特级aaaaaaaaa毛片免费视频| 国产亚洲欧美在在线人成| 6080yy成人午夜电影| 成人毛片一区二区| 五月婷婷久久综合| 欧美精品亚洲精品日韩| 啊灬啊灬啊灬快灬深用口述| 蜜桃丶麻豆91制片厂| 国产精品欧美日韩一区二区| 一本色综合久久| 日本视频www色| 亚洲乱人伦中文字幕无码| 欧美成人免费在线观看| 伊人久久精品无码AV一区| 调教女m视频免费区 | 久久精品人人槡人妻人人玩AV|