Home / News Type Content Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Farmers Say They Were Not Well-informed About Gene Probe
Adjust font size:
Chu Mianzhai, a farmer from Toutuo Town in Yuexi County, Anhui Province, disclosed in a letter that genetic studies conducted by Harvard University did not conform to standard ethics codes.

The genetic studies, using blood collected from many farmers in China, aroused grave concern from the public after media exposure early last year.

Some people point out that science, while important to the advancement of people and health, is not an autonomous entity independent from society. Scientific research must respect human dignity.

In fact, the United States, Australia and India have enacted laws requiring doctors and researchers to inform individuals of their treatment or research.

In his letter to me dated December 31, 2001, Chu recalled how he signed the so-called "informed consent form" that some investigators have claimed he signed in October 1997.

"At the time the Toutuo Hospital issued a document paper, on which were some tiny characters," he wrote. "What these words meant were not discernible to me (as I did not bring my reading glasses with me). Nor did they (referring to the people from the hospital) tell me what it was for. I was just asked to sign it. Perhaps it was the "informed consent form."

Chu, 61, and his wife and two daughters gave blood twice to the Harvard genetic study, without knowing which specific projects they were participating in. In my interview with him at his home a year ago, Chu said he first gave blood in November 1996. He and his family members were asked to give blood again in March 1997, but "there were not as many villagers the first time," he said.

Some villagers declined to go the second time, he recalled, "but I was willing to do it because I wished to get some medical treatment for my daughters, especially the eldest one. She wheezes rather severely in spring time."

But he said the expected treatment never came.

Toutuo was one of the sites for the Harvard genetic study of asthma between 1994 and 1998, with Dr Xu Xiping of Harvard School of Public Health as the principal investigator. But Chu Mianzhai said he had no idea about it, let alone that the project was funded by the National Institute of Health of the United States (NIH).

The media's coverage of the issue, Chu wrote in his letter, "is out of responsibility for the collaboration project on genetic studies as well as for the ordinary Chinese people and the Chinese nation."

A sample "informed consent form" offered to me last January by a local doctor who was involved in the blood collection for the Harvard projects, indicates that the blood taken is part of a genetic study co-sponsored by Harvard University and some Chinese medical institutions.

In the fiscal year of 2000, Xu Xiping headed nine projects funded with NIH grants amounting to nearly US$4.2 million. All of these projects involved blood collection in poor areas in Anhui. Xu claimed in earlier media interviews that his projects would involve screening 200,000 Chinese. Some American physicians were impressed that so many people could be screened at such a low cost.

By contrast, the number of collaborative projects approved by the Chinese government up to January 2001 was only three, which did not include the asthma project.

Amidst the controversy over the bioethics of Harvard projects in Anhui, the Washington Post ran a report last June, saying two Chinese officials told the US Embassy in Beijing that the Chinese probes showed up no evidence against the projects.

However, Wang Yu, deputy director of the State Administration of Human Genetic Resources, said in a conference on August 8, 2001 that no official from the administration was authorized to meet US Embassy officials in Beijing and no official was authorized to make that statement.

Even the Chinese authorities' investigation on the Harvard projects in Anhui, first conducted in late March of 2001, "have yet to reach any official conclusion," he said.

Medical people and journalists in China are continuing to investigate the case, to make sure that Chinese people's rights and bioethical principles were not violated in cross-border genetic research.

The author, Xiong Lei, is a senior journalist with China Features, Xinhua News Agency.

(China Daily January 10, 2002)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
- World's longest sea-spanning bridge to open
- Yao out for season with stress fracture in left foot
- 141 seriously polluting products blacklisted
- China starts excavation for world's first 3G nuclear plant
- 'The China Riddle'
- Irresponsible remarks on Hu Jia case opposed 
- China, US agree to step up constructive,cooperative relations
- 3 dead in south China school killing
- Factory fire kills 15, injures 3 in Shenzhen
- McDonald's turns to feng shui

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 韩国三级黄色片| 国产在线视频99| 国产精品亚洲精品日韩动图| 国产午夜亚洲精品不卡| 免费黄色a级片| 亚洲国产夜色在线观看| 中文无码热在线视频| 91制片厂果冻传媒白晶晶| t66y最新地址| 窝窝午夜色视频国产精品东北| 青苹果乐园影视免费观看电视剧hd | 婷婷久久综合网| 国产精品亚洲欧美大片在线看| 国产18禁黄网站免费观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕麻豆| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜2020一 | 中文国产在线观看| 亚洲国产老鸭窝一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区免费视频| 欧美一级在线观看| 女的和男的一起怼怼| 国产免费av片在线播放| 四虎国产成人永久精品免费| 亚洲成av人影片在线观看| 丁香亚洲综合五月天婷婷| 黄页在线播放网址| 波多野结衣作品大全| 成人免费无码精品国产电影 | 91普通话国产对白在线| 翁止熄痒禁伦短文合集免费视频 | 小小视频最新免费观看| 国产在线视精品麻豆| 亚洲精品97久久中文字幕无码| 中文字幕视频在线观看| 你懂得视频在线观看| 男女一边摸一边脱视频网站| 日本一区二区三区四区五区| 国产精品成年片在线观看| 免费a级试看片| 三级黄色在线视频中文| 鲁不死色原网站|