Home / News Type Content Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Farmers Say They Were Not Well-informed About Gene Probe
Adjust font size:
Chu Mianzhai, a farmer from Toutuo Town in Yuexi County, Anhui Province, disclosed in a letter that genetic studies conducted by Harvard University did not conform to standard ethics codes.

The genetic studies, using blood collected from many farmers in China, aroused grave concern from the public after media exposure early last year.

Some people point out that science, while important to the advancement of people and health, is not an autonomous entity independent from society. Scientific research must respect human dignity.

In fact, the United States, Australia and India have enacted laws requiring doctors and researchers to inform individuals of their treatment or research.

In his letter to me dated December 31, 2001, Chu recalled how he signed the so-called "informed consent form" that some investigators have claimed he signed in October 1997.

"At the time the Toutuo Hospital issued a document paper, on which were some tiny characters," he wrote. "What these words meant were not discernible to me (as I did not bring my reading glasses with me). Nor did they (referring to the people from the hospital) tell me what it was for. I was just asked to sign it. Perhaps it was the "informed consent form."

Chu, 61, and his wife and two daughters gave blood twice to the Harvard genetic study, without knowing which specific projects they were participating in. In my interview with him at his home a year ago, Chu said he first gave blood in November 1996. He and his family members were asked to give blood again in March 1997, but "there were not as many villagers the first time," he said.

Some villagers declined to go the second time, he recalled, "but I was willing to do it because I wished to get some medical treatment for my daughters, especially the eldest one. She wheezes rather severely in spring time."

But he said the expected treatment never came.

Toutuo was one of the sites for the Harvard genetic study of asthma between 1994 and 1998, with Dr Xu Xiping of Harvard School of Public Health as the principal investigator. But Chu Mianzhai said he had no idea about it, let alone that the project was funded by the National Institute of Health of the United States (NIH).

The media's coverage of the issue, Chu wrote in his letter, "is out of responsibility for the collaboration project on genetic studies as well as for the ordinary Chinese people and the Chinese nation."

A sample "informed consent form" offered to me last January by a local doctor who was involved in the blood collection for the Harvard projects, indicates that the blood taken is part of a genetic study co-sponsored by Harvard University and some Chinese medical institutions.

In the fiscal year of 2000, Xu Xiping headed nine projects funded with NIH grants amounting to nearly US$4.2 million. All of these projects involved blood collection in poor areas in Anhui. Xu claimed in earlier media interviews that his projects would involve screening 200,000 Chinese. Some American physicians were impressed that so many people could be screened at such a low cost.

By contrast, the number of collaborative projects approved by the Chinese government up to January 2001 was only three, which did not include the asthma project.

Amidst the controversy over the bioethics of Harvard projects in Anhui, the Washington Post ran a report last June, saying two Chinese officials told the US Embassy in Beijing that the Chinese probes showed up no evidence against the projects.

However, Wang Yu, deputy director of the State Administration of Human Genetic Resources, said in a conference on August 8, 2001 that no official from the administration was authorized to meet US Embassy officials in Beijing and no official was authorized to make that statement.

Even the Chinese authorities' investigation on the Harvard projects in Anhui, first conducted in late March of 2001, "have yet to reach any official conclusion," he said.

Medical people and journalists in China are continuing to investigate the case, to make sure that Chinese people's rights and bioethical principles were not violated in cross-border genetic research.

The author, Xiong Lei, is a senior journalist with China Features, Xinhua News Agency.

(China Daily January 10, 2002)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
Most Viewed >>
- World's longest sea-spanning bridge to open
- Yao out for season with stress fracture in left foot
- 141 seriously polluting products blacklisted
- China starts excavation for world's first 3G nuclear plant
- 'The China Riddle'
- Irresponsible remarks on Hu Jia case opposed 
- China, US agree to step up constructive,cooperative relations
- 3 dead in south China school killing
- Factory fire kills 15, injures 3 in Shenzhen
- McDonald's turns to feng shui

Product Directory
China Search
Country Search
Hot Buys
主站蜘蛛池模板: 婷婷五月在线视频| 黄色片在线播放| 日韩在线精品视频| 亚洲日韩在线中文字幕综合| 精品一区二区三区在线播放视频 | 97久久精品人妻人人搡人人玩| 少妇被又大又粗又爽毛片久久黑人 | 尤物在线影院点击进入| 亚洲中久无码永久在线观看同| 波多野结衣之双调教hd| 国产乱码一区二区三区四| 97久久天天综合色天天综合色hd| 婷婷四房综合激情五月在线| 中国武警gaysexchina武警gay| 无翼乌无遮挡h肉动漫在线观看| 久久精品国产一区二区三| 深夜动态福利gif动态进| 免费观看黄网站| 黄色永久免费网站| 国产精品va一级二级三级| yy111111影院理论大片| 成人性生交大片免费看| 中文字幕永久更新| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区免费| 久久亚洲精品国产精品黑人| 日韩成人免费在线| 久草网在线视频| 明星xxxxhdvideos| 九九精品视频在线| 最新高清无码专区| 九月婷婷人人澡人人添人人爽| 樱花草在线社区www韩国| 亚洲一卡二卡三卡四卡无卡麻豆| 欧美日韩1区2区| 亚洲天堂成人网| 欧美成人免费全部观看天天性色| 亚洲欧美日韩在线观看看另类| 精品国产免费人成网站| 啊灬啊别停灬用力啊老师网站| 黄色免费网站网址| 国产极品视觉盛宴|